The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro

. 2014 ; 5 () : 2041731414554966. [epub] 20141014

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25383177
Odkazy

PubMed 25383177
PubMed Central PMC4221924
DOI 10.1177/2041731414554966
PII: 10.1177_2041731414554966
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of in vitro cultivation technique, five marketed brands of wound covers used in the treatment of burns and other skin defects (Biobrane(®), Suprathel(®), Veloderm(®), Xe-Derma(®), and Xenoderm(®)) for their ability to stimulate the keratinocyte growth, stratification, and differentiation. In three independent experiments, human keratinocytes were grown on the tested covers in organotypic cultures by the 3T3 feeder layer technique. Vertical paraffin sections of the wound covers with keratinocytes were processed using hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunostaining for involucrin. Keratinocyte populations on the dressings were assessed for (1) number of keratinocyte strata (primary variable), (2) quantitative growth, (3) thickness of the keratinocyte layer, and (4) cell differentiation. The Xe-Derma wound cover provided the best support to keratinocyte proliferation and stratification, with the number of keratinocyte strata significantly (p < 0.05) higher in comparison to all products studied, except Xenoderm. However, in contrast to Xe-Derma, Xenoderm did not significantly differ from the other dressings. The results of this in vitro study show that the brands based on porcine dermal matrix possess the strongest effect on keratinocyte proliferation and stratification. The distinctive position of Xe-Derma may be related to its composition, where natural dermal fibers form a smooth surface, similar to the basement membrane. Furthermore, the results indicate that in vitro evaluation of effects on epithelial growth may accelerate the development of new bio-engineering-based wound covers.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zhong SP, Zhang YZ, Lim CT. Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2010; 2(5): 510–525. PubMed

Widgerow AD. Bioengineered matrices. Part 1: attaining structural success in biologic skin substitutes. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68(6): 568–573. PubMed

Consensus I. Acellular matrices for the treatment of wounds. An expert working group review. Wounds International, London, 17 October 2010.

Van der Veen VC, van der, Wal MBA, van Leeuwen MCE, et al. Biological background of dermal substitutes. Burns 2010; 36(3): 305–321. PubMed

Prunieras M, Regnier M, Woodley D. Methods for cultivation of keratinocytes with an air-liquid interface. J Invest Dermatol 1983; 81(Suppl. 1): 28s–33s. PubMed

Matoušková E, Vogtova D, Konigova R. A recombined skin composed of human keratinocytes cultured on cell-free pig dermis. Burns 1993; 19(2): 118–123. PubMed

Rheinwald JG, Green H. Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 1975; 6(3): 331–343. PubMed

Simon M, Green H. Enzymatic cross-linking of involucrin and other proteins by keratinocyte particulates in vitro. Cell 1985; 40(3): 677–683. PubMed

Zajicek R, Mandys V, Mestak O, et al. Human keratinocyte growth and differentiation on acellular porcine dermal matrix in relation to wound healing potential. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 727352(8 pp.). PubMed PMC

Matoušková E, McKay I, Povysil C, et al. Characterization of the differentiated phenotype of an organotypic model of skin derived from human keratinocytes and dried porcine dermis. Folia Biol (Praha) 1998; 44(2): 59–66. PubMed

Brett D. A review of collagen and collagen-based dermal substitutes. Wounds 2008; 20(12): 347–353. PubMed

Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Buttle DJ, et al. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science 1981; 211(4486): 1052–1054. PubMed

Wilkins LM, Watson SR, Prosky SJ, et al. Development of a bilayered living skin construct for clinical applications. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994; 43(8): 747–756. PubMed

Ge L, Zheng S, Wei H. Comparison of histological structure and biocompatibility between human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and porcine ADM. Burns 2009; 35(1): 46–50. PubMed

Zajicek R, Matoušková E, Broz L, et al. New biological temporary skin substitute Xe-Derma® in the treatment of superficial scald burns in children. Burns 2011; 37(2): 333–337. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...