SPIDIA-RNA: second external quality assessment for the pre-analytical phase of blood samples used for RNA based analyses
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25384019
PubMed Central
PMC4226503
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0112293
PII: PONE-D-14-05081
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- GPI-vázané proteiny genetika MeSH
- interleukin-1beta genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- odběr vzorku krve metody MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny c-fos genetika MeSH
- receptory faktorů nádorové nekrózy - člen 10c MeSH
- řízení kvality MeSH
- RNA krev genetika MeSH
- stanovení celkové genové exprese MeSH
- TNF decoy receptory genetika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- FOSB protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- GPI-vázané proteiny MeSH
- interleukin-1beta MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny c-fos MeSH
- receptory faktorů nádorové nekrózy - člen 10c MeSH
- RNA MeSH
- TNF decoy receptory MeSH
- TNFRSF10C protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
One purpose of the EC funded project, SPIDIA, is to develop evidence-based quality guidelines for the pre-analytical handling of blood samples for RNA molecular testing. To this end, two pan-European External Quality Assessments (EQAs) were implemented. Here we report the results of the second SPIDIA-RNA EQA. This second study included modifications in the protocol related to the blood collection process, the shipping conditions and pre-analytical specimen handling for participants. Participating laboratories received two identical proficiency blood specimens collected in tubes with or without an RNA stabilizer. For pre-defined specimen storage times and temperatures, laboratories were asked to perform RNA extraction from whole blood according to their usual procedure and to return extracted RNA to the SPIDIA facility for further analysis. These RNA samples were evaluated for purity, yield, integrity, stability, presence of interfering substances, and gene expression levels for the validated markers of RNA stability: FOS, IL1B, IL8, GAPDH, FOSB and TNFRSF10c. Analysis of the gene expression results of FOS, IL8, FOSB, and TNFRSF10c, however, indicated that the levels of these transcripts were significantly affected by blood collection tube type and storage temperature. These results demonstrated that only blood collection tubes containing a cellular RNA stabilizer allowed reliable gene expression analysis within 48 h from blood collection for all the genes investigated. The results of these two EQAs have been proposed for use in the development of a Technical Specification by the European Committee for Standardization.
Becton Dickinson Franklin Lakes New Jersey United States of America
Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences University of Florence Florence Italy
Institute of Biotechnology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pazzagli M, Malentacchi F, Simi L, Orlando C, Wyrich R, et al. (2013) SPIDIA-RNA: first external quality assessment for the pre-analytical phase of blood samples used for RNA based analyses. Methods. 59: 20–31. PubMed
Malentacchi F, Pazzagli M, Simi L, Orlando C, Wyrich R, et al. (2013) SPIDIA-DNA: An External Quality Assessment for the pre-analytical phase of blood samples used for DNA-based analyses. Clin Chim Acta. 25: 274–286. PubMed
Bustin SA (2010) Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines? – The case for MIQE. Methods 50: 217–26. PubMed
Rainen L, Oelmueller U, Jurgensen S, Wyrich R, Ballas C, et al. (2002) Stabilization of mRNA expression in whole blood samples. Clin Chem 48: 1883–90. PubMed
Tichopad A, Bar T, Pecen T, Kitchen RR, Kubista M, et al. (2010) Quality control for quantitative PCR based on amplification compatibility test. Methods 50: 308–12. PubMed
Kim SJ, Dix DJ, Thompson KE, Murrell RN, Schmid JE, et al. (2007) Effects of storage, RNA extraction, genechip type, and donor sex on gene expression profiling of human whole blood. Clin Chem 53: 1038–45. PubMed
Pahl A, Brune K (2002) Gene expression changes in blood after phlebotomy: implications for gene expression profiling. Blood 100: 1094–95. PubMed
Härtel C, Bein G, Müller-Steinhardt M, Klüter H (2001) Ex vivo induction of cytokine mRNA expression in human blood samples. J Immunol Methods 249: 63–71. PubMed
McCulloch CE, Searle SR (2001) Generalized, Linear, and mixed models. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 281–284.
Günther K, Malentacchi F, Verderio P, Pizzamiglio S, Ciniselli CM, et al. (2012) Implementation of a proficiency testing for the assessment of the preanalytical phase of blood samples used for RNA based analysis. Clinica Chimica Acta 413: 779–86. PubMed
Efron B, Tibshirana RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall 436pp.
Iglewicz B, Hoaglin DC (1993) How to Detect and Handle Outliers. In: ASCQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, 87pp.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt methods. Methods 25: 402–8. PubMed
Laurell H, Iacovoni JS, Abot A, Svec D, Maoret JJ, et al. (2012) Correction of RT-qPCR data for genomic DNA-derived signals with ValidPrime.Nucleic Acid Res. 40: e51. PubMed PMC
Fleige S, Pfaffl M (2006) RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 27: 126–39. PubMed
Fleige S, Walf V, Huch S, Prgomet C, Sehm J, et al. (2006) Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol. Let 28: 1601–13. PubMed
Nussbaumer C, Gharehbaghi-Schnell E, Korschineck I (2006) Messanger RNA profiling: a novel method for body fluid identification by real-time PCR. Forensic science international 157: 181–6. PubMed
Ovstebo R, Lande K, Kierulf P, Haug KBF (2007) Quantification of relative change in specific mRNA from frozen whole blood-methodological considerations and clinical implications. Clin Chim Med 45: 171–6. PubMed
Madej RM, Cao Z, Hall L, Neuwald PD, Williams LO (2005) Proficiency testing (external quality assessment) for molecular methods, approved guideline. CLSI document MM14-A, Vol. 25, No. 24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 1–51.
Effects of post-mortem and physical degradation on RNA integrity and quality