Leaflet reconstructive techniques for aortic valve repair
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25468084
DOI
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.052
PII: S0003-4975(14)01336-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- anuloplastika srdeční chlopně metody MeSH
- aortální chlopeň chirurgie MeSH
- aortální insuficience diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- chirurgické laloky * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- echokardiografie transezofageální MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- perikard transplantace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- šicí techniky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Refining leaflet reconstruction has become a primary issue in aortic valve repair. This descriptive analysis reviews leaflet pathology, repair techniques, and early results in a prospective regulatory trial of aortic valve repair. METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent valve repair for predominant moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI). The mean age was 63 ± 13 years, and 69% of the patients were male. Ascending aortic/root replacement was required in 62%. As a first step, ring annuloplasty was performed, and then leaflet repair included leaflet plication for prolapse, nodular unfolding, double pericardial patching of commissural defects or holes, complete pericardial leaflet replacement, leaflet extension, and Gore-Tex reinforcement. Leaflet techniques and causes of adverse outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The follow-up time was 2-years maximal and 0.9 years mean, with a survival of 97%. Eighty percent of patients required repair of leaflet defects: leaflet prolapse (52/65-80%), ruptured commissures (6/65-9%), leaflet holes (4/65-6%), and nodular retraction (6/65-9%). The average preoperative AI grade of 2.9 ± 0.8 fell to 0.7 ± 0.7 (p < 0.0001). Three patients (4.6%) required interval valve replacement because of (1) suture untying, (2) iatrogenic leaflet tear, or (3) diphtheroid endocarditis. Five other patients experienced grade 2 or grade 3 AI: probable suture untying in 1 patient, ineffective leaflet extensions in 2 patients, and unsuccessful Gore-Tex reinforcements in 2 patients. Two patients with single pericardial leaflet replacements and all those with double pericardial reconstructions did well. CONCLUSIONS: Leaflet defects are common in patients with moderate to severe AI. Leaflet plication, nodular unfolding, and double pericardial patching performed well. Gore-Tex and leaflet extension seemed less satisfactory. Standardization and experience with leaflet reconstruction will be important for optimizing the outcomes of aortic valve repair.
Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg Germany
German Heart Center Berlin Berlin Germany
German Heart Center Munich Munich Germany
Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czechoslovakia
Klinikum Nuernberg Nuernberg Germany
University Heart Center Hamburg Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01400841