Measuring biomass and carbon stock in resprouting woody plants
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25719601
PubMed Central
PMC4342014
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0118388
PII: PONE-D-14-43749
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biomasa * MeSH
- dřevo chemie MeSH
- semenáček chemie MeSH
- uhlík analýza MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- uhlík MeSH
Resprouting multi-stemmed woody plants form an important component of the woody vegetation in many ecosystems, but a clear methodology for reliable measurement of their size and quick, non-destructive estimation of their woody biomass and carbon stock is lacking. Our goal was to find a minimum number of sprouts, i.e., the most easily obtainable, and sprout parameters that should be measured for accurate sprout biomass and carbon stock estimates. Using data for 5 common temperate woody species, we modelled carbon stock and sprout biomass as a function of an increasing number of sprouts in an interaction with different sprout parameters. The mean basal diameter of only two to five of the thickest sprouts and the basal diameter and DBH of the thickest sprouts per stump proved to be accurate estimators for the total sprout biomass of the individual resprouters and the populations of resprouters, respectively. Carbon stock estimates were strongly correlated with biomass estimates, but relative carbon content varied among species. Our study demonstrated that the size of the resprouters can be easily measured, and their biomass and carbon stock estimated; therefore, resprouters can be simply incorporated into studies of woody vegetation.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bond WJ, Midgley JJ. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: The persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16: 45–51. PubMed
Everham EM, Brokaw NV. Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot Rev. 1996;62: 113–185.
Dietze MC, Clark JS. Changing the gap dynamics paradigm: vegetative regeneration control on forest response to disturbance. Ecol Monogr. 2008;78: 331–347.
Matula R, Svátek M, Řepka R. The effect of fire exclusion on the structure and tree mortality patterns of a caldén (Prosopis caldenia Burkart) woodland in semi-arid Central Argentina. J Arid Environ. 2014;100–101: 72–77.
Paciorek CJ, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. The demographics of resprouting in tree and shrub species of a moist tropical forest. J Ecol. 2000;88: 765–777.
Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ. Resprouting as a key functional trait in woody plants—challenges to developing new organizing principles. New Phytol. 2010;188: 651–654. PubMed
Zewdie M, Olsson M, Verwijst T. Above-ground biomass production and allometric relations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. coppice plantations along a chronosequence in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33: 421–428.
Harrington RA, Fownes JH. Allometry and growth of planted versus coppice stands of four fast-growing tropical tree species. For Ecol Manage. 1993;56: 315–327.
Wright L. Worldwide commercial development of bioenergy with a focus on energy crop-based projects. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006;30: 706–714.
Verwijst T, Telenius B. Biomass estimation procedures in short rotation forestry. For Ecol Manage. 1999;121: 137–146.
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns M, Chambers J, Eamus D, et al. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia. 2005;145: 87–99. PubMed
Gower S, Krankina O, Olson R, Apps M, Linder S, Wang C. Net primary production and carbon allocation patterns of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecol Appl. 2001;11: 1395–1411.
Haase R, Haase P. Above-ground biomass estimates for invasive trees and shrubs in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. For Ecol Manage. 1995;73: 29–35.
Henry M, Picard N, Trotta C, Manlay RJ, Valentini R, Bernoux M, et al. Estimating tree biomass of sub-Saharan African forests: a review of available allometric equations. Silva Fenn. 2011;45: 477–569.
Baskerville GL. Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass. Can J For Res. 1972;2: 49–53.
Matula R, Svátek M, Kůrová J, Úradníček L, Kadavý J, Kneifl M. The sprouting ability of the main tree species in Central European coppices: implications for coppice restoration. Eur J For Res. 2012;131: 1501–1511.
Mosseler A, Major J, Labrecque M, Larocque G. Allometric relationships in coppice biomass production for two North American willows (Salix spp.) across three different sites. For Ecol Manage. 2014;320: 190–196.
Tanentzap AJ, Mountford EP, Cooke AS, Coomes DA. The more stems the merrier: advantages of multi-stemmed architecture for the demography of understorey trees in a temperate broadleaf woodland. J Ecol. 2012;100: 171–183.
Fang S, Liu Z, Cao Y, Liu D, Yu M, Tang L. Sprout development, biomass accumulation and fuelwood characteristics from coppiced plantations of Quercus acutissima. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35: 3104–3114.
Liu Z, Fang S, Liu D, Yu M, Tang L. Influence of thinning time and density on sprout development, biomass production and energy stocks of sawtooth oak stumps. For Ecol Manage. 2011;262: 299–306.
Robertson K, Hmielowski T. Effects of fire frequency and season on resprouting of woody plants in southeastern US pine-grassland communities. Oecologia. 2014;174: 765–776. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2823-4 PubMed DOI
Hector A, Philipson C, Saner P, Chamagne J, Dzulkifli D, O’Brien M, et al. The Sabah Biodiversity Experiment: a long-term test of the role of tree diversity in restoring tropical forest structure and functioning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366: 3303–3315. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0094 PubMed DOI PMC
Lamlom S, Savidge R. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy. 2003;25: 381–388.
Zhang Q, Wang C, Wang X, Quan X. Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258: 722–727.
Thomas SC, Malczewski G. Wood carbon content of tree species in Eastern China: Interspecific variability and the importance of the volatile fraction. J Environ Manage. 2007;85: 659–662. PubMed
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach 2nd ed. Springer; 2002.
Magee L. R 2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. Am Stat. 1990;44: 250–253.
Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78: 691–692.
Paine CET, Marthews TR, Vogt DR, Purves D, Rees M, Hector A, et al. How to fit nonlinear plant growth models and calculate growth rates: an update for ecologists. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3: 245–256.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2012.
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–117. 2014.
Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R. The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks. New York: CABI Publishing; 2002.
Johansson T. Sprouting ability and biomass production of downy and silver birch stumps of different diameters. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32: 944–951.
Hytönen J, Kaunisto S. Effect of fertilization on the biomass production of coppiced mixed birch and willow stands on a cut-away peatland. Biomass Bioenergy. 1999;17: 455–469.
Hytönen J, Lumme I, Törmälä T. Comparison of methods for estimating willow biomass. Biomass. 1987;14: 39–49.
Crawley MJ. The R book 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.