The European Standard EN 14757 recommends gillnet mesh sizes that range from 5 to 55mm (knot-to-knot) for the standard monitoring of fish assemblages and suggests adding gillnets with larger mesh sizes if necessary. Our research showed that the recommended range of mesh sizes did not provide a representative picture of fish sizes for larger species that commonly occur in continental Europe. We developed a novel, large mesh gillnet which consists of mesh sizes 70, 90, 110 and 135mm (knot to knot, 10m panels) and assessed its added value for monitoring purposes. From selectivity curves obtained by sampling with single mesh size gillnets (11 mesh sizes 6 - 55mm) and large mesh gillnets, we identified the threshold length of bream (Abramis brama) above which this widespread large species was underestimated by European standard gillnet catches. We tested the European Standard gillnet by comparing its size composition with that obtained during concurrent pelagic trawling and purse seining in a cyprinid-dominated reservoir and found that the European Standard underestimated fish larger than 292mm by 26 times. The inclusion of large mesh gillnets in the sampling design removed this underestimation. We analysed the length-age relationship of bream in the Římov Reservoir, and concluded that catches of bream larger than 292mm and older than five years were seriously underrepresented in European Standard gillnet catches. The Římov Reservoir is a typical cyprinid-dominated water body where the biomass of bream > 292mm formed 70% of the pelagic trawl and purse seine catch. The species-specific relationships between the large mesh gillnet catch and European Standard catch suggested that the presence of carp (Cyprinus carpio), European catfish (Silurus glanis), tench (Tinca tinca) or bream warrants the use of both gillnet types. We suggest extending the gillnet series in the European Standard to avoid misinterpretation of fish community biomass estimates.

Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v v i Institute of Hydrobiology České Budějovice Czech Republic

Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v v i Institute of Hydrobiology České Budějovice Czech Republic; Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic

Department of Plant Biology and Ecology Faculty of Biology University of Seville Seville Spain

Ecohydros S L Polígono Industrial de Cros Maliaño Spain

Erratum v

PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0128469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128469. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Appelberg M, Berger H-M, Hesthagen T, Kleiven E, Kurkilahti M, Raitaniemi J, et al. Development and intercalibration of methods in nordic freshwater fish monitoring. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 1995;85: 401–406.

Argillier C, Caussé S, Gevrey M, Pédron S, Bortoli J, Brucet S, et al. Development of a fish-based index to assess the eutrophication status of European lakes. Hydrobiologia. 2013;704: 193–211.

Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Amsinck SL. Water Framework Directive: Ecological classification of Danish lakes. J Appl Ecol. 2005;42: 616–629.

CEN. Water quality—Sampling of fish with multi-mesh gillnets (English version prEN 14757:2013). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2005.

Mehner T. No empirical evidence for community-wide top-down control of prey fish density and size by fish predators in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr. 2010;55: 203–213.

Emmrich M, Brucet S, Ritterbusch D, Mehner T. Size spectra of lake fish assemblages: Responses along gradients of general environmental factors and intensity of lake-use. Freshw Biol. 2011;56: 2316–2333.

Brucet S, Pédron S, Mehner T, Lauridsen TL, Argillier C, Winfield IJ, et al. Fish diversity in European lakes: Geographical factors dominate over anthropogenic pressures. Freshw Biol. 2013;58: 1779–1793. 10.1002/hep.26538 PubMed DOI

EC. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Parliam. 2000;L327: 1–82.

Emmrich M, Pédron S, Brucet S, Winfield IJ, Jeppesen E, Volta P, et al. Geographical patterns in the body-size structure of European lake fish assemblages along abiotic and biotic gradients. Jetz W, editor. J Biogeogr. 2014;41: 2221–2233.

Prchalová M, Kubečka J, Říha M, Mrkvicka T, Vašek M, Juza T, et al. Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species. Fish Res. 2009;96: 51–57.

Olin M, Malinen T, Ruuhijärvi J. Gillnet catch in estimating the density and structure of fish community—Comparison of gillnet and trawl samples in a eutrophic lake. Fish Res. 2009;96: 88–94.

Olin M, Malinen T. Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling. Hydrobiologia. 2003;506–509: 443–449.

Hansson S, Rudstam LG. Gillnet catches as an estimate of fish abundance: a comparison between vertical gillnet catches and hydroacoustic abundances of Baltic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Sptattus sptattus) Can J Fish Aquat Sci. NRC Research Press; Ottawa, Canada; 1995;52: 75–83.

Finstad AG, Jansen P a, Langeland A. Gillnet selectivity and size and age structure of an alpine Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2000;57: 1718–1727.

Holmgren K, Appelberg M. Size structure of benthic freshwater fish communities in relation to environmental gradients. J Fish Biol. Academic Press Ltd, 24–28 Oval Rd, London Nw1 7dx, England; 2000;57: 1312–1330.

Pope KL, Wilde GR, Bauer DL. Maximum size of fish caught with standard gears and recreational angling. Fish Res. 2005;76: 117–122.

Achleitner D, Gassner H, Luger M. Comparison of three standardised fish sampling methods in 14 alpine lakes in Austria. Fish Manag Ecol. 2012;19: 352–361.

Rudstam LG, Magnuson JJ, Tonn WM. Size Selectivity of Passive Fishing Gear: A Correction for Encounter Probability Applied to Gill Nets. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada; 1984;41: 1252–1255.

Carol J, García-Berthou E. Gillnet selectivity and its relationship with body shape for eight freshwater fish species. J Appl Ichthyol. 2007;23: 654–660.

Hamley JM. Review of Gillnet Selectivity. J Fish Res Board Canada. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada; 1975;32: 1943–1969.

Reis E., Pawson M. Fish morphology and estimating selectivity by gillnets. Fish Res. 1999;39: 263–273.

Kurkilahti M, Appelberg M, Hesthagen T, Rask M. Effect of fish shape on gillnet selectivity: a study with Fulton’s condition factor. Fish Res. 2002;54: 153–170.

Psuty I, Borowski W. The selectivity of gill nets to bream (Abramis brama L.) fished in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon. Fish Res. 1997;32: 249–261.

Kurkilahti M, Rask M. A comparative study of the usefulness and catchability of multimesh gill nets and gill net series in sampling of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and roach (Rutilus rutilus L.). Fish Res. 1996;27: 243–260.

Jensen JW. Gillnet selectivity and the efficiency of alternative combinations of mesh sizes for some freshwater fish. J Fish Biol. 1986;28: 637–646.

Bonar SA, Contreras-Balderas S, Iles AC. Chapter 9: Converting Nonstandard Fish Sampling Data to Standardized Data In: Bonar SA, Hubert WA, Willis DW, editors. Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fishes. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society; 2009. p. 335.

Jurvelius J, Kolari I, Leskelä A. Quality and status of fish stocks in lakes: gillnetting, seining, trawling and hydroacoustics as sampling methods Hydrobiologia. 2011. pp. 29–36.

Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL. Life, death and life histories Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems. 4th ed Oxford: Blackwell publishing; 2009. pp. 89–132.

Vašek M, Kubečka J, Peterka J, Čech M, Draštík V, Hladík M, et al. Longitudinal and Vertical Spatial Gradients in the Distribution of Fish within a Canyon-shaped Reservoir. Int Rev Hydrobiol. 2004;89: 352–362.

Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Kubečka J, Peterka J, Čech M, Muška M, et al. Fish activity as determined by gillnet catch: A comparison of two reservoirs of different turbidity Fisheries Research. 2010. pp. 291–296.

Říha M, Jůza T, Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Čech M, Draštík V, et al. The size selectivity of the main body of a sampling pelagic pair trawl in freshwater reservoirs during the night. Fish Res. 2012;128: 56–60.

D & L Software Pty Ltd Australia. Des Newman’s OziExplorer software version 3.95. 2011.

Kottelat M, Freyhof J. Handbook of European freshwater fishes Publications Kottelat (privately published); 2007. p. 646 pp.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.

Godø OR, Pennington M, Vølstad JH. Effect of tow duration on length composition of trawl catches. Fisheries Research. 1990. pp. 165–179.

Hjellvik V, Godø OR, Tjøstheim D. Diurnal variation in bottom trawl survey catches: does it pay to adjust? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2002. pp. 33–48.

Turunen T, Kurkilahti M, Suuronen P. Gill net catchability and selectivity of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. s.l.): seasonal effect of mesh size and twine diameter In: Eckmann R, Appenzeller A, Rosch R, editors. Advances in Limnology 50: Biology and Management of Coregonid Fishes—1996. E Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 1998. pp. 429–437.

Hansen MJ, Schorfhaar RG, Selgeby JH. Gill-Net Saturation by Lake Trout in Michigan Waters of Lake Superior. North Am J Fish Manag. Taylor & Francis; 1998;18: 847–853.

Olin M, Kurkilahti M, Peitola P, Ruuhijärvi J. The effects of fish accumulation on the catchability of multimesh gillnet. Fish Res. 2004;68: 135–147.

Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Peterka J, Čech M, Berec L, Kubečka J. A model of gillnet catch in relation to the catchable biomass, saturation, soak time and sampling period. Fish Res. 2011;107: 201–209.

Muška M, Tušer M, Frouzová J, Draštík V, Čech M, Jůza T, et al. To migrate, or not to migrate: partial diel horizontal migration of fish in a temperate freshwater reservoir. Hydrobiologia. 2012;707: 17–28.

Mehner T, Holmgren K, Lauridsen TL, Jeppesen E, Diekmann M. Lake depth and geographical position modify lake fish assemblages of the European “Central Plains” ecoregion. Freshw Biol. 2007;52: 2285–2297.

Garcia XF, Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R, Mehner T. Correlations between type-indicator fish species and lake productivity in German lowland lakes. J Fish Biol. 2006;68: 1144–1157.

Gassner H, Wanzenböck J, Zick D, Tischler G, Pamminger-Lahnsteiner B. Development of a fish based lake typology for natural Austrian lakes >50 ha based on the reconstructed historical fish communities. Int Rev Hydrobiol. 2005;90: 422–432.

Říha M, Kubečka J, Vašek M, Seďa J, Mrkvička T, Prchalová M, et al. Long-term development of fish populations in the Římov Reservoir. Fish Manag Ecol. 2009;16: 121–129.

Lammens EHRR, Frank-Landman A, McGillavry PJ, Vlink B. The role of predation and competition in determining the distribution of common bream, roach and white bream in Dutch eutrophic lakes. Environ Biol Fishes. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992;33: 195–205.

Bunn SE, Arthington AH. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity Environmental Management. 2002. pp. 492–507. PubMed

García-Asorey MI, Escati-Peñaloza G, Parma AM, Pascual MA, Marshall CT. Conflicting objectives in trophy trout recreational fisheries: evaluating trade-offs using an individual-based model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2011. pp. 1892–1904.

Vašek M, Prchalová M, Peterka J, Ketelaars HAM, Wagenvoort AJ, Čech M, et al. The utility of predatory fish in biomanipulation of deep reservoirs. Ecol Eng. 2013;52: 104–111.

Maury O, Poggiale JC. From individuals to populations to communities: A dynamic energy budget model of marine ecosystem size-spectrum including life history diversity. J Theor Biol. 2013;324: 52–71. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.018 PubMed DOI

Carol J, Benito J, Garc E. On the spread of the European catfish (Silurus glanis) in the Iberian Peninsula: first record in the Llobregat river basin. 2007;26: 169–171.

Baum JK, Worm B. Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2009. pp. 699–714. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01531.x PubMed DOI

Transition to Piscivory Seen Through Brain Transcriptomics in a Juvenile Percid Fish: Complex Interplay of Differential Gene Transcription, Alternative Splicing, and ncRNA Activity

Long-lines for research monitoring and efficient population regulation of an invasive apex predator, European catfish (Silurus glanis)

Who Is Who: An Anomalous Predator-Prey Role Exchange between Cyprinids and Perch