Many invasive species are considered competitively superior to native species, with the strongest competition expected in species with similar niches and/or in closely related species. However, competition outcome is strongly context-dependent as competitive strength varies along environmental gradients, and life stages, and also depends on abundances. To explore the importance of these factors, we examined competition effects in an experiment with three Impatiens species (Balsaminaceae) widespread in central Europe and sharing similar life-history characteristics and habitats: the native I. noli-tangere, and two invasive species, I. parviflora and I. glandulifera. We compared their competitive strength and reciprocal impacts under two levels of water and light availability, two overall planting densities and three competitor densities. We assessed species performance (ability to complete the life-cycle, biomass and fecundity) and temporal competition dynamics in a garden pot experiment. Environmental variables had lower explanatory power than overall planting and competitor density, which indicates the importance of competitive interactions when evaluating plant performance and potential invasion success. Despite poor and delayed germination, the invasive I. glandulifera attained dominance even at a high competitor density and was competitively superior across all treatments, exceeding the height of both congeners. Impatiens parviflora was competitively weakest, having a negligible impact on both native I. noli-tangere and invasive I. glandulifera. The intermediate competitive strength of the native I. noli-tangere probably results from its intermediate height, and good germination rate and timing. The difference in height among species increased during the experiment when I. glandulifera was involved; this species continues growing until autumn, enhancing its competitive superiority. The results provide a mechanistic understanding for the competitive exclusion of native I. noli-tangere that occurs in stands with I. glandulifera, but the limited impact of I. parviflora on I. noli-tangere in their mixed stands.

Department of Invasion Ecology Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ 252 43 Czech Republic

Department of Invasion Ecology Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ 252 43 Czech Republic Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Benátská 2 Prague CZ 128 01 Czech Republic

Department of Invasion Ecology Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ 252 43 Czech Republic Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Viničná 7 Prague CZ 128 44 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Adamowski W. 2008. Balsams on the offensive: the role of planting in the invasion of Impatiens species. In: Tokarska-Guzik B, Brock JH, Brundu G, Child L, Daehler CC, Pyšek P, eds. Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers, 57–70.

Alexander JM, Kueffer C, Daehler CC, Edwards PJ, Pauchard A, Seipel T; MIREN Consortium. 2011. Assembly of nonnative floras along elevational gradients explained by directional ecological filtering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:656–661. 10.1073/pnas.1013136108 PubMed DOI PMC

Andrews M, Maule HG, Hodge S, Cherrill A, Raven JA. 2009. Seed dormancy, nitrogen nutrition and shade acclimation of Impatiens glandulifera: implications for successful invasion of deciduous woodland. Plant Ecology and Diversity 2:145–153. 10.1080/17550870903186256 DOI

Antonovics J, Fowler NL. 1985. Analysis of frequency and density effects on growth in mixtures of Salvia splendens and Linum grandiflorum using hexagonal fan designs. The Journal of Ecology 73:219–234. 10.2307/2259779 DOI

Antonovics J, Levin DA. 1980. The ecological and genetic consequences of density-dependent regulation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:411–452. 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002211 DOI

Baker HG. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL, eds. The genetics of colonizing species. New York: Academic Press, 147–172.

Beerling DJ, Perrins JM. 1993. Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Impatiens roylei Walp.). The Journal of Ecology 81:367–382. 10.2307/2261507 DOI

Berg MP, Ellers J. 2010. Trait plasticity in species interactions: a driving force of community dynamics. Evolutionary Ecology 24:617–629. 10.1007/s10682-009-9347-8 DOI

Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:333–339. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 PubMed DOI

Burns JH. 2004. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Diversity and Distributions 10:387–397. 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00105.x DOI

Cahill JF, Jr., Kembel SW, Lamb EG, Keddy PA. 2008. Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10:41–50. 10.1016/j.ppees.2007.10.001 DOI

Carvallo GO, Medel R, Navarro L. 2013. Assessing the effects of native plants on the pollination of an exotic herb, the blueweed Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Arthropod-Plant Interactions 7:475–484. 10.1007/s11829-013-9265-0 DOI

Chmura D, Sierka E. 2007. The invasibility of deciduous forest communities after disturbance: a case study of Carex brizoides and Impatiens parviflora invasion. Forest Ecology and Management 242:487–495. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.083 DOI

Connolly J, Wayne P, Murray R. 1990. Time course of plant-plant interactions in experimental mixtures of annuals: density, frequency, and nutrient effects. Oecologia 82:513–526. 10.1007/BF00319795 PubMed DOI

Coombe DE. 1956. Impatiens parviflora DC. The Journal of Ecology 44:701–713. 10.2307/2256857 DOI

Crawley MJ. 1987. What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ, eds. Colonization, succession, and stability. Oxford: Blackwell, 429–453.

Crawley MJ. 2007. The R book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P. 2014. Habitat requirements, short-term population dynamics and coexistence of native and invasive Impatiens species: a field study. Biological Invasions 16:177–190. 10.1007/s10530-013-0512-1 DOI

Daehler CC. 2001. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis revisited. The American Naturalist 158:324–330. 10.1086/321316 PubMed DOI

Daehler CC. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:183–211. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403 DOI

Daehler CC. 2005. Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 7:203–216. 10.1016/j.ppees.2005.08.002 DOI

Darwin C. 1859. The origin of species. London: John Murray.

Davies KW, Nafus AM, Sheley RL. 2010. Non-native competitive perennial grass impedes the spread of an invasive annual grass. Biological Invasions 12:3187–3194. 10.1007/s10530-010-9710-2 DOI

Diez JM, Sullivan JJ, Hulme PE, Edwards G, Duncan RP. 2008. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecology Letters 11:674–681. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01178.x PubMed DOI

Dostál P. 2010. Post-dispersal seed mortality of exotic and native species: effects of fungal pathogens and seed predators. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:676–684. 10.1016/j.baae.2010.10.001 DOI

Elton C. 1946. Competition and the structure of ecological communities. The Journal of Animal Ecology 15:54–68. 10.2307/1625 DOI

Elton CS. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen.

Faliński JB. 1998. Invasive alien plants, vegetation dynamics and neophytism. Phytocoenosis 10 (N.S.) Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae 9:163–188.

Franzese J, Ghermandi L. 2014. Early competition between the exotic herb Rumex acetosella and two native tussock grasses with different palatability and water stress tolerance. Journal of Arid Environments 106:58–62. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.03.004 DOI

Funk JL. 2008. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. Journal of Ecology 96:1162–1173. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01435.x DOI

Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR. 2001. Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecological Monographs 71:423–446. 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0423:DDIAAP]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M. 2007. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 94:526–532. PubMed

Hardin G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297. 10.1126/science.131.3409.1292 PubMed DOI

Harper JL. 1977. The population biology of plants. London: Academic Press.

Hatcher PE. 2003. Impatiens noli-tangere L. Journal of Ecology 91:147–167. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00741.x DOI

Hejda M, Pyšek P. 2006. What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biological Conservation 132:143– 152.

Hierro JL, Lortie CJ, Villarreal D, Estanga-Mollica ME, Callaway RM. 2011. Resistance to Centaurea solstitialis invasion from annual and perennial grasses in California and Argentina. Biological Invasions 13:2249–2259. 10.1007/s10530-011-0037-4 DOI

Hutchinson GE. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22:415–427. 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039 DOI

Kubešová M, Moravcová L, Suda J, Jarošík V, Pyšek P. 2010. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82:81–96.

Lambdon PW, Lloret F, Hulme PE. 2008. Do alien plants on Mediterranean islands tend to invade different niches from native species? Biological Invasions 10:703–716. 10.1007/s10530-007-9163-4 DOI

Leger EA, Espeland EK. 2010. Coevolution between native and invasive plant competitors: implications for invasive species management. Evolutionary Applications 3:169–178. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00105.x PubMed DOI PMC

Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters 7:975–989. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00657.x DOI

MacArthur RH. 1972. Geographical ecology. New York: Harper & Row.

MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM. 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. Journal of Ecology 97:609–615. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01514.x DOI

Maherali H, Klironomos JN. 2007. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science 316:1746–1748. 10.1126/science.1143082 PubMed DOI

Matesanz S, Gimeno TE, de la Cruz M, Escudero A, Valladares F. 2011. Competition may explain the fine-scale spatial patterns and genetic structure of two co-occurring plant congeners. Journal of Ecology 99:838–848. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01812.x DOI

Maule HG, Andrews M, Watson C, Cherrill A. 2000. Distribution, biomass and effect on native species of Impatiens glandulifera in a deciduous woodland in northeast England. Aspects of Applied Biology 58:31–38.

Mayfield MM, Levine JM. 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecology Letters 13:1085–1093. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01509.x PubMed DOI

Milberg P, Lamont BB, Pérez-Fernández MA. 1999. Survival and growth of native and exotic composites in response to a nutrient gradient. Plant Ecology 145:125–132. 10.1023/A:1009817804815 DOI

Molina-Montenegro MA, Peñuelas J, Munné-Bosch S, Sardans J. 2012. Higher plasticity in ecophysiological traits enhances the performance and invasion success of Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) in alpine environments. Biological Invasions 14:21–33. 10.1007/s10530-011-0055-2 DOI

Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Havlíčková V, Zákravský P. 2010. Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia 82:365–390.

Pahl AT, Kollmann J, Mayer A, Haider S. 2013. No evidence for local adaptation in an invasive alien plant: field and greenhouse experiments tracing a colonization sequence. Annals of Botany 112:1921–1930. 10.1093/aob/mct246 PubMed DOI PMC

Pathikonda S, Ackleh AS, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S. 2009. Invasion, disturbance, and competition: modeling the fate of coastal plant populations. Conservation Biology 23:164–173. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01073.x PubMed DOI

Pellock S, Thompson A, He KS, Mecklin CJ, Yang J. 2013. Validity of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis relates to the stages of invasion. Community Ecology 14:172–179. 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.2.7 DOI

Perglová I, Pergl J, Skálová H, Moravcová L, Jarošík V, Pyšek P. 2009. Differences in germination and seedling establishment of alien and native Impatiens species. Preslia 81:357–375.

Perrins J, Fitter AH, Williamson M. 1990. What makes Impatiens glandulifera invasive? In: Palmer J, ed. The biology and control of invasive plants. Cardiff: University of Wales, 8–33.

Powell KI, Knight TM. 2009. Effects of nutrient addition and competition on biomass of five Cirsium species (Asteraceae), including a serpentine endemic. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170:918–925. 10.1086/600140 DOI

Pyšek P, Richardson DM. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W, ed. Biological invasions. Berlin: Springer, 97–125.

Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Wild J. 2011. Colonization of high altitudes by alien plants over the last two centuries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:439–440. 10.1073/pnas.1017682108 PubMed DOI PMC

Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J, Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Kaplan Z, Krahulec F, Moravcová L, Pergl J, Štajerová K, Tichý L. 2012a. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155–255.

Pyšek P, Chytrý M, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Wild J. 2012b. Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. Preslia 84:575–629.

Rejmánek M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation 78:171–181. 10.1016/0006-3207(96)00026-2 DOI

Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M. 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9:981–993. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x PubMed DOI

Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93–107. 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x DOI

Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Pyšek P. 2007. Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia 79:303–321.

Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:305–332. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037 DOI

Shea K, Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170–176. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3 DOI

Silvertown J, Charlesworth D. 2009. Introduction to plant population biology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Skálová H, Havlíčková V, Pyšek P. 2012. Seedling traits, plasticity and local differentiation as strategies of invasive species of Impatiens in central Europe. Annals of Botany 110:1429–1438. 10.1093/aob/mcr316 PubMed DOI PMC

Skálová H, Jarošík V, Dvořáčková Š, Pyšek P. 2013. Effect of intra- and interspecific competition on the performance of native and invasive species of Impatiens under varying levels of shade and moisture. PLoS ONE 8:e62842 10.1371/journal.pone.0062842 PubMed DOI PMC

Slavík B. 1997. Impatiens L. In: Slavík B, Chrtek jun. J, Tomšovic P, eds. Květena České republiky 5 [Flora of the Czech Republic]. Praha: Academia, 230–240.

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1987. Introduction to biostatistics, 2nd edn Mineola: W.H. Freeman & Comp., p. 363, ISBN 978-0716718055.

Tichý J. 1997. Changes in forest vegetation on Ondřejník permanent plot after thirty years. Lesnictví 43:363–373.

van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. 2010. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13:235–245. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x PubMed DOI

Vervoort A, Cawoy V, Jacquemart A-L. 2011. Comparative reproductive biology in co-occurring invasive and native Impatiens species. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172:366–377. 10.1086/658152 DOI

Vilà M, Weiner J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12682.x DOI

Violle C, Nemergut DR, Pu Z, Jiang L. 2011. Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. Ecology Letters 14:782–787. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01644.x PubMed DOI

Wiens JJ, Graham CH. 2005. Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:519–539. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 DOI