Using structural MRI to identify individuals at genetic risk for bipolar disorders: a 2-cohort, machine learning study
Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
103703
Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Canada
106469
Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Canada
PubMed
25853284
PubMed Central
PMC4543094
DOI
10.1503/jpn.140142
PII: 10.1503/jpn.140142
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bílá hmota anatomie a histologie patologie MeSH
- bipolární porucha diagnóza genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci * MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- neurozobrazování * MeSH
- prefrontální mozková kůra anatomie a histologie patologie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- šedá hmota anatomie a histologie patologie MeSH
- spánkový lalok anatomie a histologie patologie MeSH
- strojové učení * MeSH
- support vector machine MeSH
- temenní lalok anatomie a histologie patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Kanada MeSH
BACKGROUND: Brain imaging is of limited diagnostic use in psychiatry owing to clinical heterogeneity and low sensitivity/specificity of between-group neuroimaging differences. Machine learning (ML) may better translate neuroimaging to the level of individual participants. Studying unaffected offspring of parents with bipolar disorders (BD) decreases clinical heterogeneity and thus increases sensitivity for detection of biomarkers. The present study used ML to identify individuals at genetic high risk (HR) for BD based on brain structure. METHODS: We studied unaffected and affected relatives of BD probands recruited from 2 sites (Halifax, Canada, and Prague, Czech Republic). Each participant was individually matched by age and sex to controls without personal or family history of psychiatric disorders. We applied support vector machines (SVM) and Gaussian process classifiers (GPC) to structural MRI. RESULTS: We included 45 unaffected and 36 affected relatives of BD probands matched by age and sex on an individual basis to healthy controls. The SVM of white matter distinguished unaffected HR from control participants (accuracy = 68.9%, p = 0.001), with similar accuracy for the GPC (65.6%, p = 0.002) or when analyzing data from each site separately. Differentiation of the more clinically heterogeneous affected familiar group from healthy controls was less accurate (accuracy = 59.7%, p = 0.05). Machine learning applied to grey matter did not distinguish either the unaffected HR or affected familial groups from controls. The regions that most contributed to between-group discrimination included white matter of the inferior/middle frontal gyrus, inferior/middle temporal gyrus and precuneus. LIMITATIONS: Although we recruited 126 participants, ML benefits from even larger samples. CONCLUSION: Machine learning applied to white but not grey matter distinguished unaffected participants at high and low genetic risk for BD based on regions previously implicated in the pathophysiology of BD.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Orrù G, Pettersson-Yeo W, Marquand AF, et al. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:1140–52. PubMed
Fu CH, Costafreda SG. Neuroimaging-based biomarkers in psychiatry: clinical opportunities of a paradigm shift. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58:499–508. PubMed
Borgwardt S, Fusar-Poli P. Third-generation neuroimaging in early schizophrenia: translating research evidence into clinical utility. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:270–2. PubMed
Davatzikos C. Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences. Neuroimage. 2004;23:17–20. PubMed
Davatzikos C, Shen D, Gur RC, et al. Whole-brain morphometric study of schizophrenia revealing a spatially complex set of focal abnormalities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1218–27. PubMed
Kempton MJ, Geddes JR, Ettinger U, et al. Meta-analysis, database, and meta-regression of 98 structural imaging studies in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:1017–32. PubMed
Selvaraj S, Arnone D, Job D, et al. Grey matter differences in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:135–45. PubMed
Hajek T, Cullis J, Novak T, et al. Hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorders: opposing effects of illness burden and lithium treatment. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:261–70. PubMed PMC
Moylan S, Maes M, Wray NR, et al. The neuroprogressive nature of major depressive disorder: pathways to disease evolution and resistance, and therapeutic implications. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:595–606. PubMed
Andreasen NC, Liu D, Ziebell S, et al. Relapse duration, treatment intensity, and brain tissue loss in schizophrenia: a prospective longitudinal MRI study. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:609–15. PubMed PMC
Hajek T, Bauer M, Simhandl C, et al. Neuroprotective effect of lithium on hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorder independent of long-term treatment response. Psychol Med. 2014;44:507–17. PubMed
Hajek T, Kopecek M, Hoschl C, et al. Smaller hippocampal volumes in patients with bipolar disorder are masked by exposure to lithium: a meta-analysis. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2012;37:333–43. PubMed PMC
Bond DJ, Ha TH, Lang DJ, et al. Body mass index-related regional gray and white matter volume reductions in first-episode mania patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:138–45. PubMed
Hajek T, Calkin C, Blagdon R, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a potentially modifiable risk factor for neurochemical brain changes in bipolar disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:295–303. PubMed
Fusar-Poli P, Howes O, Bechdolf A, et al. Mapping vulnerability to bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2012;37:170–84. PubMed PMC
van der Schot AC, Vonk R, Brans RG, et al. Influence of genes and environment on brain volumes in twin pairs concordant and discordant for bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:142–51. PubMed
Hajek T, Carrey N, Alda M. Neuroanatomical abnormalities as risk factors for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7:393–403. PubMed
Hajek T, Cullis J, Novak T, et al. Brain structural signature of familial predisposition for bipolar disorder: replicable evidence for involvement of the right inferior frontal gyrus. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:144–52. PubMed PMC
van der Schot AC, Vonk R, Brouwer RM, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on focal brain density in bipolar disorder. Brain. 2010;133:3080–92. PubMed
Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:636–45. PubMed
Duffy A, Alda M, Kutcher S, et al. A prospective study of the offspring of bipolar parents responsive and nonresponsive to lithium treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:1171–8. PubMed
Hajek T, Novak T, Kopecek M, et al. Subgenual cingulate volumes in offspring of bipolar parents and in sporadic bipolar patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;260:297–304. PubMed
Duffy A, Alda M, Hajek T, et al. Early course of bipolar disorder in high-risk offspring: prospective study. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195:457–8. PubMed
Ortiz A, Bradler K, Slaney C, et al. An admixture analysis of the age at index episodes in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2011;188:34–9. PubMed
Endicott J, Spitzer RL. A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35:837–44. PubMed
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, et al. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:980–8. PubMed
Chang K, Steiner H, Dienes K, et al. Bipolar offspring: a window into bipolar disorder evolution. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53:945–51. PubMed
Duffy A, Alda M, Hajek T, et al. Early stages in the development of bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2010;121:127–35. PubMed
Hillegers MH, Reichart CG, Wals M, et al. Five-year prospective outcome of psychopathology in the adolescent offspring of bipolar parents. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7:344–50. PubMed
Rocha-Rego V, Jogia J, Marquand AF, et al. Examination of the predictive value of structural magnetic resonance scans in bipolar disorder: a pattern classification approach. Psychol Med. 2014;44:519–32. PubMed PMC
Koutsouleris N, Meisenzahl EM, Davatzikos C, et al. Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:700–12. PubMed PMC
Mourao-Miranda J, Reinders AA, Rocha-Rego V, et al. Individualized prediction of illness course at the first psychotic episode: a support vector machine MRI study. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1037–47. PubMed PMC
Bitter T, Bruderle J, Gudziol H, et al. Gray and white matter reduction in hyposmic subjects — a voxel-based morphometry study. Brain Res. 2010;1347:42–47. PubMed
Matsuo K, Kopecek M, Nicoletti MA, et al. New structural brain imaging endophenotype in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:412–20. PubMed
Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839–51. PubMed
Marquand A, Howard M, Brammer M, et al. Quantitative prediction of subjective pain intensity from whole-brain fMRI data using Gaussian processes. Neuroimage. 2010;49:2178–89. PubMed
Marquand AF, Mourao-Miranda J, Brammer MJ, et al. Neuroanatomy of verbal working memory as a diagnostic biomarker for depression. Neuroreport. 2008;19:1507–11. PubMed
Schnack HG, Nieuwenhuis M, van Haren NE, et al. Can structural MRI aid in clinical classification? A machine learning study in two independent samples of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and healthy subjects. Neuroimage. 2014;84:299–306. PubMed
Ecker C, Rocha-Rego V, Johnston P, et al. Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: a pattern classification approach. Neuroimage. 2010;49:44–56. PubMed
LaConte S, Strother S, Cherkassky V, et al. Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2005;26:317–29. PubMed
Vederine FE, Wessa M, Leboyer M, et al. A meta-analysis of whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35:1820–6. PubMed
Hajek T, Alda M, Hajek E, et al. Functional neuroanatomy of response inhibition in bipolar disorders–combined voxel based and cognitive performance meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1955–66. PubMed
Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, et al. Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:515–28. PubMed
Phillips ML, Swartz HA. A critical appraisal of neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder: toward a new conceptualization of underlying neural circuitry and a road map for future research. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:829–43. PubMed PMC
Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Almeida J, et al. The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:313–25. PubMed PMC
Arnone D, McIntosh AM, Ebmeier KP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;22:1–16. PubMed
Arnone D, Cavanagh J, Gerber D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195:194–201. PubMed
Nieuwenhuis M, van Haren NE, Hulshoff Pol HE, et al. Classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls from structural MRI scans in two large independent samples. Neuroimage. 2012;61:606–12. PubMed