Combining various types of classifiers and features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging data in schizophrenia recognition
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25912090
DOI
10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.03.004
PII: S0925-4927(15)00064-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Average linkage, Centroid method, Classification, Computational neuroanatomy, Intersubject principal component analysis (isPCA), Modified maximum uncertainty linear discriminant analysis (mMLDA),
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Discriminant Analysis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Schizophrenia diagnosis MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
We investigated a combination of three classification algorithms, namely the modified maximum uncertainty linear discriminant analysis (mMLDA), the centroid method, and the average linkage, with three types of features extracted from three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) brain images, specifically MR intensities, grey matter densities, and local deformations for distinguishing 49 first episode schizophrenia male patients from 49 healthy male subjects. The feature sets were reduced using intersubject principal component analysis before classification. By combining the classifiers, we were able to obtain slightly improved results when compared with single classifiers. The best classification performance (81.6% accuracy, 75.5% sensitivity, and 87.8% specificity) was significantly better than classification by chance. We also showed that classifiers based on features calculated using more computation-intensive image preprocessing perform better; mMLDA with classification boundary calculated as weighted mean discriminative scores of the groups had improved sensitivity but similar accuracy compared to the original MLDA; reducing a number of eigenvectors during data reduction did not always lead to higher classification accuracy, since noise as well as the signal important for classification were removed. Our findings provide important information for schizophrenia research and may improve accuracy of computer-aided diagnostics of neuropsychiatric diseases.
References provided by Crossref.org