Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Cancer Samples with Indeterminate Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization by Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25956448
DOI
10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.007
PII: S1525-1578(15)00082-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Gene Amplification MeSH
- Formaldehyde chemistry MeSH
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence methods MeSH
- Immunoenzyme Techniques MeSH
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor analysis MeSH
- Tumor Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 genetics metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Paraffin Embedding methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- ERBB2 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Formaldehyde MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 MeSH
Administration of drugs targeting HER2 (official symbol ERBB2) is an important component of therapy for breast cancer patients with HER2 amplification/overexpression as determined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In approximately 5% of breast cancers, ISH assays fail. In these cases, HER2 protein expression is evaluated by IHC alone that may yield false negatives/positives for poor-quality samples. Therefore, we developed a method that was based on quantitative real-time PCR applicable for DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Its limit of detection was determined with breast cancer cell lines and validated with 223 breast cancer patient samples. On the basis of comparisons with fluorescent ISH (FISH) and IHC data, the sensitivity of the new method was 94.2% and 95.1%, its specificity was 100% and 99.1%, and overall concordance between results obtained with the quantitative real-time PCR method and FISH/IHC was 97.6% for both methods. The quantitative real-time PCR method was then used to evaluate the HER2 status of 198 of 3696 breast cancer tissues that yielded indeterminate FISH results. The HER2 copy number was successfully determined in 69.2% of these indeterminate samples. Thus, the DNA-based technique appears to be a specific, sensitive method for determining HER2 copy numbers when the FISH assay fails, which may complement IHC tests.
References provided by Crossref.org