This paper examines the patterns of the US and Australian immigration geography and the process of regional population diversification and the emergence of new immigrant concentrations at the regional level. It presents a new approach in the context of human migration studies, focusing on spatial relatedness between individual foreign-born groups as revealed from the analysis of their joint spatial concentrations. The approach employs a simple assumption that the more frequently the members of two population groups concentrate in the same locations the higher is the probability that these two groups can be related. Based on detailed data on the spatial distribution of foreign-born groups in US counties (2000-2010) and Australian postal areas (2006-2011) we firstly quantify the spatial relatedness between all pairs of foreign-born groups and model the aggregate patterns of US and Australian immigration systems conceptualized as the undirected networks of foreign-born groups linked by their spatial relatedness. Secondly, adopting a more dynamic perspective, we assume that immigrant groups with higher spatial relatedness to those groups already concentrated in a region are also more likely to settle in this region in future. As the ultimate goal of the paper, we examine the power of spatial relatedness measures in projecting the emergence of new immigrant concentrations in the US and Australian regions. The results corroborate that the spatial relatedness measures can serve as useful instruments in the analysis of the patterns of population structure and prediction of regional population change. More generally, this paper demonstrates that information contained in spatial patterns (relatedness in space) of population composition has yet to be fully utilized in population forecasting.

Department of Social Geography and Regional Development Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Hou F. Changes in the initial destinations and redistribution of Canada's major immigrant groups: reexamining the role of group affinity. Int Migr Rev. 2007;41: 680–705.

Light I, von Scheven E. Mexican migration networks in the United States, 1980–2000. Int Migr Rev. 2008;42: 704–728.

Brezzi M, Dumont JC, Piacentini M, Thoreau C. Determinants of localisation of recent immigrants across OECD regions [Internet]. OECD workshop Migration and Regional Development, June 7, 2010. Available from: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/49/45344744.pdf

Van der Gaag N, Van Wissen L. Modelling regional immigration: using stocks to predict flows. Eur J Popul. 2002;18: 387–409.

Rogers A, Willekens F, Raymer F. Imposing age and spatial structures on inadequate migration-flow datasets. Prof Geogr. 2003;55: 56–69.

Wilson T, Rees P. Recent developments in population projection methodology: a review. Popul Space Place. 2005;11: 337–360.

Bijak J. Forecasting international migration: selected theories, models, and methods Warsaw: Central European Forum For Migration Research; 2006. Apr. CEFRM Working Paper.

Bijak J. Forecasting international migration in Europe: A Bayesian view Dodrecht: Springer; 2010.

Rogers A. Demographic modelling of the geography of migration and population: a multiregional perspective. Geogr Anal. 2010;40: 276–296.

Kancs A. The economic geography of labour migration: Competition, competitiveness and development. Appl Geogr. 2011;31: 191–200.

Rees P, Wohland P, Norman P. The demographic drivers of future ethnic group populations for UK local areas 2001–2051. Geogr J. 2013;179: 44–60.

Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási AL, Hausmann R. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science. 2007;317: 482–487. PubMed

Novotný J, Cheshire JA. The surname space of the Czech Republic: examining population structure by network analysis of spatial co-occurrence of surnames. PLoS One. 2012;7: 1–12. PubMed PMC

Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: a proximity approach based on product relatedness. Econ Geogr. 2013;89: 29–51.

Liaw KL, Frey WH. Multivariate explanation of the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants in the United States: the beginning of a new trend? Popul Space Place. 2007;13: 377–399.

Maré DC, Morten M, Stillman S. Settlement patterns and the geographic mobility of recent migrants to New Zealand. New Zealand Economic Papers. 2008;41: 163–195.

Novotný J, Janská E, Čermáková D. Rozmístění cizinců v Česku a jeho podmiňující factory: pokus o kvantitativní analýzu. Geografie. 2007;112: 204–220. Czech.

Fonseca ML. New waves of immigration to small towns and rural areas in Portugal. Popul Space Place. 2008;14: 525–535.

McConnell ED. The U.S. Destinations of contemporary Mexican immigrants. Int Migr Rev. 2008;42: 767–802.

Lichter DT, Johnson KM. Immigrant gateways and Hispanic migration to new destinations. Int Migr Rev. 2009;43: 496–518.

Pena AA. Locational choices of the legal and illegal: the case of Mexican agricultural workers in the U.S. Int Migr Rev. 2009;43: 850–880.

Riosmena F, Massey DS. Pathways to El Norte: origins, destinations, and characteristics of Mexican migrants to the United States. Int Migr Rev. 2012;46: 3–36. PubMed PMC

Janská E, Čermák Z, Wright R. New immigrant destinations in a new country of immigration: settlement patterns of non-natives in the Czech Republic. Popul Space Place. 2014;20: 680–693.

Frey WH. Immigration and domestic migration in US metro areas: 2000 and 1990 Census findings by education and race. Washington, D.C.: Population Studies Center. 2005. Population Studies Center Research Report 05–472.

Hempstead K. Mobility of the foreign-born population in the United States, 1995–2000: the role of gateway states. Int Migr Rev. 2007;41: 466–479.

Hall M. Interstate migration, spatial assimilation, and the incorporation of US immigrants. Popul Space Place. 2009;15: 57–77.

Massey DS. New faces in new places: the changing geography of American immigration New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 2010.

Hugo G. Changing spatial patterns of immigrant settlement In: Clyne M, Jupp J, editors. Multiculturalism and Integration: A Harmonious Relationship. Canberra: ANU E Press; 2011. p. 1–40.

Ellis M, Wright R, Townley M. ‘New destinations’ and immigrant poverty In: Raphael S, Card D, editors. Immigration, Poverty, and Socioeconomic Inequality in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2013. p. 135–166.

Massey DS. Patterns and processes of international migration in the 21st century. Johannesburg: Conference on African Migration in Comparative Perspective, 4–7 June; 2003.

Drbohlav D, Uherek Z. Reflexe migračních teorií. Geografie. 2007;112: 125–141. Czech.

Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A, Taylor JE. Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19: 431–466.

Skop EH. Race and place in the adaptation of mariel exiles. Int Migr Rev. 2001;35: 449–471.

Harte W, Childs IRW, Hastings PA. Settlement patterns of African refugee communities in Southeast Queensland. Aust Geogr. 2009;40: 51–67.

Bauer T, Epstein GS, Gang IN. Enclaves, language, and the location choice of migrants. J Popul Econ. 2005;18: 649–662.

Chiswick BR, Lee YL, Miller PW. The determinants of the geographic concentration among immigrants: application to Australia. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor; 2002. Discussion Paper No. 462.

Edgar B. An intergenerational model of spatial assimilation in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2014;40: 363–383.

Lianos TP. Illegal migrants to Greece and their choice of destination. Int Migr. 2001;39: 3–28.

van Tubergen F, Maas F, Flap H. The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 Western societies: origin, destination, and community effects. Am Sociol Rev. 2004;69: 704–727.

Phythian K, Walters D, Anisef P. Predicting earnings among immigrants to Canada: the role of source country. Int Migr. 2011;49: 129–154.

Kritz MM. Investment, population growth and GNP as determinants of US immigration. Int J Popul Geogr. 1998;4: 243–258. PubMed

Chiswick BR, Miller PW. Where immigrants settle in the United States Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor; 2004. Discussion Paper No. 1231.

Alesina A, Harnoss J, Rapoport H. Birthplace diversity and economic prosperity Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2013. NBER Working Paper Series 8 460.

Hugo G. Immigrant settlement outside of Australia’s capital cities. Popul Space Place. 2008;14: 553–571.

Davis KF, D'Odorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L. Global spatio-temporal patterns in human migration: a complex network perspective. PLoS One. 2013;8: 1–8. PubMed PMC

Fagiolo G, Mastrorillo M. Does human migration affect international trade? A complex-network perspective. PLoS One. 2014;9: 1–11. PubMed PMC

Wilson T. Quantifying the uncertainty of regional demographic forecasts. Appl Geogr. 2013;42: 108–115.

Fertig M, Schmidt ChM. Aggregate-level migration studies as a tool for forecasting future migration streams. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor; 2001. IZA Discussion Paper No 183.