Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution in cervical glandular neoplasias: Results from a European multinational epidemiological study

. 2015 Dec 15 ; 137 (12) : 2858-68. [epub] 20150714

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26096203

Cervical glandular neoplasias (CGN) present a challenge for cervical cancer prevention due to their complex histopathology and difficulties in detecting preinvasive stages with current screening practices. Reports of human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and type-distribution in CGN vary, providing uncertain evidence to support prophylactic vaccination and HPV screening. This study [108288/108290] assessed HPV prevalence and type-distribution in women diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, N = 49), adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC, N = 104), and various adenocarcinoma subtypes (ADC, N = 461) from 17 European countries, using centralised pathology review and sensitive HPV testing. The highest HPV-positivity rates were observed in AIS (93.9%), ASC (85.6%), and usual-type ADC (90.4%), with much lower rates in rarer ADC subtypes (clear-cell: 27.6%; serous: 30.4%; endometrioid: 12.9%; gastric-type: 0%). The most common HPV types were restricted to HPV16/18/45, accounting for 98.3% of all HPV-positive ADC. There were variations in HPV prevalence and ADC type-distribution by country. Age at diagnosis differed by ADC subtype, with usual-type diagnosed in younger women (median: 43 years) compared to rarer subtypes (medians between 57 and 66 years). Moreover, HPV-positive ADC cases were younger than HPV-negative ADC. The six years difference in median age for women with AIS compared to those with usual-type ADC suggests that cytological screening for AIS may be suboptimal. Since the great majority of CGN are HPV16/18/45-positive, the incorporation of prophylactic vaccination and HPV testing in cervical cancer screening are important prevention strategies. Our results suggest that special attention should be given to certain rarer ADC subtypes as most appear to be unrelated to HPV.

1st Department of Oncologic Gynaecology and Gynaecology Medical University of Lublin Poland

Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Clinical Epidemiology Unit Department of Medicine Karolinska Institute Solna Sweden

CERVIVA Research Consortium Funded by the Health Research Board Ireland Based at the Department of Pathology The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital and Trinity College Dublin Ireland

Clinics Biostatistics Paris France

Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

DDL Diagnostic Laboratory Rijswijk The Netherlands

Department of Anatomical Pathology General Hospital of Patras Achaia Greece

Department of Gynaecology and Oncologic Gynaecology Military Institute of Medicine Warsaw Poland

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hvidovre University Hospital Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology St Stephan Hospital Budapest Hungary

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Oncology University of Sheffield Medical School Sheffield England United Kingdom

Department of Pathology Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Belfast Northern Ireland United Kingdom

Department of Pathology Weill Medical College of Cornell University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY

Epidemiology Department GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines Wavre Belgium

Global Health Economics GSK Vaccines Wavre Belgium

Hospital Clinic August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

IMS Health Stockholm Sweden

Institute of Cancer and Genetics HPV Research Group Cardiff University School of Medicine Cardiff Wales United Kingdom

Institute of Oncology of RAMS Siberian Branch Tomsk Russia

Laboratory of Microbiology DO Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology St Petersburg Russia

Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic Gynecological Oncology Unit Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Antwerp University Hospital University of Antwerp Antwerpen Belgium

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department University Hospital Puerto De Hierro Majadahonda Madrid Spain

University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Globocan. Cancer fact sheet. 2012. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Last accessed 18 January 2015.

Ferlay J, Steliarova‐Foucher E, Lortet‐Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. PubMed

Arbyn M, Raifu AO, Weiderpass E, et al. Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:2640–8. PubMed

Bray F, Carstensen B, Møller H, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:2191–9. PubMed

Gien LT, Beauchemin M‐C, Thomas G. Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116:140–6. PubMed

Seoud M, Tjalma WAA, Ronsse V. Cervical adenocarcinoma: moving towards better prevention. Vaccine 2011; 29:9148–58. PubMed

Adegoke O, Kulasingam S, Virnig B. Cervical cancer trends in the United States: a 35‐year p‐based analysis. J Women Health 2012; 21:1031–7. PubMed PMC

Pimenta JM, Galindo C, Jenkins D, et al. Estimate of the global burden of cervical adenocarcinoma and potential impact of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:553–65. PubMed PMC

Ault KA, Joura EA, Kjaer SK, et al. Adenocarcinoma in situ and associated human papillomavirus type distribution observed in two clinical trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. Int J Cancer 2011; 128:1344–53. PubMed

Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population‐based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12:663–72. PubMed PMC

Talaat A, Brinkmann D, Dhundee J, et al. Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with? Glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology. Cytopathology 2012; 23:371–7. PubMed

Park KJ, Kiyokawa T, Soslow RA, et al. Unusual endocervical adenocarcinomas. an immunohistochemical analysis with molecular detection of human papillomavirus. Am J Surg Pathol 2011; 35:633–49. PubMed

Di Bonito L, Bergeron C. Cytological screening of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Ann Pathol 2012; 32:394–400. PubMed

Pirog EC, Kleter B, Olgac S, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in different histological subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol 2000; 57:1055–62. PubMed PMC

Kusanagi Y, Kojima A, Mikami Y, et al. Absence of high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in endocervical adenocarcinoma with gastric morphology and phenotype. Am J Pathol 2010; 177:2169–75. PubMed PMC

McCluggage WG. New developments in endocervical glandular lesions. Histopathology 2013; 62:138–60. PubMed

Pirog EC, Lloveras B, Molijn A, et al. HPV prevalence and genotypes in different histological subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma, a worldwide analysis of 760 cases. Modern Pathology 2014; 27:1559–67. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2014.55 PubMed DOI

Houghton O, Jamison J, Wilson R, et al. p16 immunoreactivity in unusual types of cervical adenocarcinoma does not reflect human papillomavirus infection. Histopathology 2010; 57:342–50. PubMed

de Sanjose S, Quint WGV, Alemany L, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross‐sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:1048–56. PubMed

Tjalma WA, Fiander A, Reich O, et al. Differences in human papillomavirus type distribution in high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer in Europe. Int J Cancer 2013; 132:854–67. PubMed

Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, et al. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: a meta‐analysis update. Int J Cancer 2007; 121:621–32. PubMed

Quek SC, Lim BK, Domingo E, et al. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia across 5 countries in Asia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23:148–56. PubMed

Park J‐S, Kim Y‐T, Lee A, et al. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinoma in Korean women. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:115–20. PubMed

Kleter B, van Doorn L‐J, Schrauwen L, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of a highly sensitive PCR‐reverse hybridization line probe assay for detection and identification of anogenital human papillomavirus. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:2508–17. PubMed PMC

Safaeian M, Herrero R, Hildesheim H, et al. Comparison of the SPF PubMed PMC

Zielinski GD, Snijders PJF, Rozendaal L, et al. The presence of high‐risk HPV combined with specific p53 and p16INK4a expression patterns points to high‐risk HPV as the main causative agent for adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. J Pathol 2003; 201:535–43. PubMed

An H, Kim KR, Kim IS, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in various histological subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma: a population‐based study. Modern Pathol 2005; 18:528–34. PubMed

Castellsagué X, Díaz M, de Sanjosé S, et al.; for the International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:303–15. PubMed

Quint KD, de Koning MNC, Geraets DT, et al. Comprehensive analysis of human papillomavirus and PubMed

Tenti P, Romagnoli S, Silini E, et al. Human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 infection in infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the cervix: PCR analysis of 138 cases and correlation with histologic type and grade. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106:52–6. PubMed

Riethdorf S, Riethdorf L, Milde‐Langosch K, et al. Differences in HPV 16‐ and HPV 18 E6/E7 oncogene expression between in situ and invasive adenocarcinomas of the cervix uteri. Virchows Archiv 2000; 437:491–500. PubMed

Tawfik El‐Mansi M, Cuschieri KS, Morris RG, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in cervical adenocarcinoma and its precursors in Scottish patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16:1025–31. PubMed

Alemany L, Pérez C, Tous S, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in cervical cancer cases in Spain. Implications for prevention. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124:512−17. PubMed

Vinokurova S, Wentzensen N, Kraus I, et al. Type‐dependent integration frequency of human papillomavirus genomes in cervical lesions. Cancer Res 2008; 68:307–13. PubMed

Andersson S, Mints M, Wilander E. Results of cytology and high‐risk human papillomavirus testing in females with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Oncol Lett 2013; 6:215−19. PubMed PMC

Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. PubMed PMC

Park JJ, Sun D, Quade BJ, et al. Stratified mucin‐producing intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: adenosquamous or columnar cell neoplasia? Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24:1414–19. PubMed

Alfsen GC, Reed W, Abeler VM. Reproducibility of classification in non‐squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90:282–9. PubMed

Jenkins D, Molijn A, Pirog K, et al. The Complex Relationship of HPV to Cervical Adenocarcinoma ‐ a cross‐sectional survey with LCM‐PCR of the relation between HPV, tumour histology, stage and patient age. In: 29th International Papillomavirus Conference and Clinical Workshop, Seattle, USA, 20–25 August 2014.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...