Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with non-malignant diseases
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
26259076
DOI
10.1038/bmt.2015.171
PII: bmt2015171
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alografty MeSH
- busulfan aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky analogy a deriváty MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- transplantace kmenových buněk * MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- busulfan MeSH
- treosulfan MeSH Prohlížeč
An increasing number of children with non-malignant diseases can be cured by allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Treosulfan (L-treitol-1,4-bis-methanesulfonate) is being used more frequently for conditioning, owing to its' lower toxicity profile compared with conventional myeloablative regimens. A retrospective analysis was performed of children registered in the EBMT database, who received treosulfan before HSCT between January 2005 and 2010, to identify possible dose-related toxicity and determine the incidence of engraftment, treatment-related mortality and overall survival (OS). Results from 316 transplants from 11 different countries are presented. Ninety-five (30%) were under 1 year of age at the time of transplant. OS was 83% and event-free survival was 76%; 3-year OS and event-free survival of infants below 1 year were 79% and 73%, respectively. No association was found with age at transplant, dose of treosulfan given, other agents used in combination with treosulfan, donor type, stem cell source, or second or subsequent transplant. In this report of the largest number of children to date receiving treosulfan for non-malignant diseases, treosulfan is shown to be a safe and effective agent even for those under 1 year of age at the time of transplant. Further prospective studies are needed using precisely defined protocols with pharmacokinetic monitoring and detailed chimerism analysis. In addition, long-term studies will be vital to determine long-term effects, for example, on fertility in comparison with other regimens.
Department of Paediatric Hematology Oncology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Department of Paediatrics Leiden University Medical Center RC Leiden The Netherlands
Paediatric HSCT Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Trust London UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Blood. 2004 Jan 15;103(2):725-31 PubMed
Drug Discov Today. 2014 Oct;19(10):1572-86 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Dec;28(11):1001-11 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Nov;28(10):909-15 PubMed
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Aug;36(4):465-72 PubMed
Exp Hematol. 2006 Jan;34(1):115-21 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Feb;35(3):233-41 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;17(3):341-50 PubMed
Transplantation. 1974 Oct;18(4):295-304 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;19(3):492-5 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Dec;20(12 ):1996-2003 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 2008 Jun;142(2):257-62 PubMed
Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):436-48 PubMed
Haematologica. 2014 Jan;99(1):180-4 PubMed
Ann Hematol. 2015 Feb;94(2):297-306 PubMed
Talanta. 2014 Sep;127:123-32 PubMed
Blood. 2011 Apr 21;117(16):4367-75 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e61637 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Apr;48(4):491-501 PubMed
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010 Oct;19(10):1275-95 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 2008 Dec;143(5):748-51 PubMed
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Sep;126(3):602-10.e1-11 PubMed
Blood. 2012 Jul 12;120(2):473-6 PubMed