Treosulfan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT in children with chronic granulomatous disease: a multicenter experience
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
P01 HL122173
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
27216217
PubMed Central
PMC4957165
DOI
10.1182/blood-2016-03-704015
PII: S0006-4971(20)34336-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- akutní nemoc MeSH
- alografty MeSH
- busulfan aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty MeSH
- chronická granulomatózní nemoc * krev mortalita terapie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli krev mortalita MeSH
- neutrofily metabolismus MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- přežívání štěpu účinky léků MeSH
- příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * MeSH
- trombocyty metabolismus MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Názvy látek
- busulfan MeSH
- treosulfan MeSH Prohlížeč
Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) can be cured by allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Complications include graft failure, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infection, and transplant-related mortality; therefore, reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are being used to improve outcomes. In this retrospective study, the aim was to determine the outcome of treosulfan-based conditioning in HSCT for pediatric patients with CGD. The following data were collected: risk features pre-HSCT, additional conditioning agents, donor type and stem cell source, toxicity, engraftment, GVHD, chimerism, viral reactivation, post-HSCT complications, length of follow-up, and outcome. Seventy patients (median age, 107 months; interquartile range [IQR], 46-232 months) from 16 centers worldwide were transplanted between 2006 and 2015. Ninety-one percent had high-risk features. Fifty-seven HLA-matched donors, 12 HLA-mismatched donors, and 1 CD3(+)TCR αβ/CD19 depleted parental haploidentical transplants were performed. No major toxicity was reported. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 17 (IQR, 15-35) and 16 (IQR, 13-50) days. At a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR, 13-102 months), the overall survival was 91.4%, and event-free survival was 81.4%. The cumulative incidence of acute grade III-IV GVHD was 12%. Nine patients developed chronic GVHD. When split cell chimerism was available, 95% or more myeloid donor chimerism was documented in 80% of surviving patients. Secondary graft failure occurred in 12% of patients. Treosulfan-containing conditioning regimens can be used safely in HSCT for children with CGD and high-risk clinical features, achieving excellent survival with high myeloid chimerism. Further studies are needed to compare with other regimens and evaluate the long-term outcome, particularly on fertility.
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Teaching Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic;
Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Ulm Ulm Germany;
Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany;
Lady Cilento Children's Hospital Brisbane Australia;
Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI;
Paediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Great Ormond Street Hospital London United Kingdom;
Pediatric Haematology Oncology University Medical Centre Freiburg Germany;
University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany;
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Goldblatt D. Recent advances in chronic granulomatous disease. J Infect. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S32–S35. PubMed
Marciano BE, Spalding C, Fitzgerald A, et al. Common severe infections in chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(8):1176–1183. PubMed PMC
Jones LB, McGrogan P, Flood TJ, et al. Special article: chronic granulomatous disease in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a comprehensive national patient-based registry. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;152(2):211–218. PubMed PMC
Cole T, Pearce MS, Cant AJ, Cale CM, Goldblatt D, Gennery AR. Clinical outcome in children with chronic granulomatous disease managed conservatively or with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1150–1155. PubMed
Salvator H, Mahlaoui N, Catherinot E, et al. Pulmonary manifestations in adult patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(6):1613–1623. PubMed
Soncini E, Slatter MA, Jones LB, et al. Unrelated donor and HLA-identical sibling haematopoietic stem cell transplantation cure chronic granulomatous disease with good long-term outcome and growth. Br J Haematol. 2009;145(1):73–83. PubMed
Seger RA. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic granulomatous disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010;30(2):195–208. PubMed
Cole T, McKendrick F, Titman P, et al. Health related quality of life and emotional health in children with chronic granulomatous disease: a comparison of those managed conservatively with those that have undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplant. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(1):8–13. PubMed
Seger RA, Gungor T, Belohradsky BH, et al. Treatment of chronic granulomatous disease with myeloablative conditioning and an unmodified hemopoietic allograft: a survey of the European experience, 1985-2000. Blood. 2002;100(13):4344–4350. PubMed
Horwitz ME, Barrett AJ, Brown MR, et al. Treatment of chronic granulomatous disease with nonmyeloablative conditioning and a T-cell-depleted hematopoietic allograft. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(12):881–888. PubMed
Segal BH, Veys P, Malech H, Cowan MJ. Chronic granulomatous disease: lessons from a rare disorder. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(1 Suppl):S123–S131. PubMed PMC
Chiesa R, Veys P. Reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplant in primary immune deficiencies. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012;8(3):255–267. PubMed
Güngör T, Teira P, Slatter M, et al. Inborn Errors Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Reduced-intensity conditioning and HLA-matched haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with chronic granulomatous disease: a prospective multicentre study. Lancet. 2014;383(9915):436–448. PubMed
Slatter MA, Boztug H, Pötschger U, et al. EBMT Inborn Errors and Paediatric Diseases Working Parties. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with non-malignant diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(12):1536–1541. PubMed
Slatter MA, Rao K, Amrolia P, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency: United Kingdom experience. Blood. 2011;117(16):4367–4375. PubMed
Burroughs LM, Nemecek ER, Torgerson TR, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation for nonmalignant diseases: a prospective multicenter trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(12):1996–2003. PubMed PMC
Boztug H, Zecca M, Sykora KW, et al. EBMT paediatric diseases working party. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic HSCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(2):297–306. PubMed
Mathews V, George B, Viswabandya A, et al. Improved clinical outcomes of high risk β thalassemia major patients undergoing a HLA matched related allogeneic stem cell transplant with a treosulfan based conditioning regimen and peripheral blood stem cell grafts. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61637. PubMed PMC
ten Brink MH, Zwaveling J, Swen JJ, Bredius RG, Lankester AC, Guchelaar HJ. Personalized busulfan and treosulfan conditioning for pediatric stem cell transplantation: the role of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(10):1572–1586. PubMed
Filipovich AH. Diagnosis and manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2008;21(2):251–257. PubMed
Klaudel-Dreszler MA, Kalwak K, Kurenko-Deptuch M, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen in a second matched unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for a pediatric patient with CGD and invasive aspergillosis, who experienced initial graft failure after RIC. Int J Hematol. 2009;90(5):571–575. PubMed
Oshrine B, Morsheimer M, Heimall J, Bunin N. Reduced-intensity conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation of chronic granulomatous disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(2):359–361. PubMed
Marsh RA, Lane A, Mehta PA, et al. Alemtuzumab levels impact acute GVHD, mixed chimerism, and lymphocyte recovery following alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan RIC HCT. Blood. 2016;127(4):503–512. PubMed
Rao K, Amrolia PJ, Jones A, et al. Improved survival after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. Blood. 2005;105(2):879–885. PubMed
Panasiuk A, Nussey S, Veys P, et al. Gonadal function and fertility after stem cell transplantation in childhood: comparison of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen containing melphalan with a myeloablative regimen containing busulfan. Br J Haematol. 2015;170(5):719–726. PubMed