Preserved cutaneous silent period in cervical root avulsion
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26312387
PubMed Central
PMC5430474
DOI
10.1179/2045772315y.0000000053
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- A-delta fibers, Brachial plexopathy, Cutaneous silent period, Electromyography, Root avulsion,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electromyography methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Brachial Plexus Neuropathies complications diagnosis MeSH
- Brachial Plexus injuries MeSH
- Radiculopathy diagnosis etiology MeSH
- Reaction Time * MeSH
- Reflex * MeSH
- Muscle Contraction MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Brachial plexus injuries are usually severe and involve the entire brachial plexus, sometimes occurring with root avulsions. Imaging and electrodiagnostic studies are an essential part of the lesion evaluation; however, the results sometimes show a discrepancy. The cutaneous silent period (SP) is a spinal inhibitory reflex mediated by small-diameter A-delta nociceptive fibers. The aim of the study was to determine if cutaneous SP testing may serve as a useful aid in evaluation of brachial plexus injury and/or in the diagnosis of root avulsion. METHODS: In 19 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury (15 males, age 18-62 years) we performed a clinical examination, CT myelography and neurophysiological testing. A needle EMG was obtained from muscles supplied by C5-T1 myotomes. Cutaneous SP was recorded after painful stimuli were delivered to the thumb (C6 dermatome), middle (C7) and little (C8) fingers while subjects maintained voluntary contraction of intrinsic hand muscles. RESULTS: Electrodiagnostic and imaging studies confirmed root avulsion (partial or total) maximally involving C5, C6 roots in 12 patients, whereas only in 4 of them the cutaneous SP was partially absent. In the remaining subjects, the cutaneous SP was preserved. CONCLUSION: In brachial plexopathy even with plurisegmental root avulsion, the cutaneous SP was mostly preserved. This method cannot be recommended as a reliable test for diagnosis of single root avulsion; however, it can provide a quick physiological confirmation of functional afferent A-delta fibers through damaged roots and/or trunks. The clinicians may add this test to the diagnosis of spinal cord dysfunction.
b Department of Neurosurgery 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Chanlalit C, Vipulakorn K, Jiraruttanapochai K, Mairiang E, Chowcheun P. Value of clinical findings, electrodiagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of root lesions in traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88(1):66–70. PubMed
Puri V, Chaudhry N, Jain KK, Chowdhury D, Nehru R. Brachial plexopathy: a clinical and electrophysiological study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004;44(4):229–35. PubMed
Roger B, Travers V, Laval-Jeantet M. Imaging of posttraumatic brachial plexus injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;237:57–61. PubMed
Ochi M, Ikuta Y, Watanabe M, Kimori K, Itoh K. The diagnostic value of MRI in traumatic brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Br 1994;19(1):55–9. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90050-7 PubMed DOI
Parry GJ. Electrodiagnostic studies in the evaluation of peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries. Neurol Clin 1992;10(4):921–34. PubMed
Abul-Kasim K, Backman C, Björkman A, Dahlin LB. Advanced radiological work-up as an adjunct to decision in early reconstructive surgery in brachial plexus injuries. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2010;5:14. PubMed PMC
Caccia MR, McComas AJ, Upton ARM, Blogg T. Cutaneous reflexes in small muscles of the hand. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973;36(6):960–77. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.36.6.960 PubMed DOI PMC
Floeter MK. Cutaneous silent periods. Muscle Nerve 2003;28(4):391–401. doi: 10.1002/mus.10447 PubMed DOI
Shefner JM, Logigian EL. Relationship between stimulus strength and the cutaneous silent period. Muscle Nerve 1993;16(3):278–82. doi: 10.1002/mus.880160306 PubMed DOI
Uncini A, Kujirai T, Gluck B, Pullman S. Silent period induced by cutaneous stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;81(5):344–52. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90023-Q PubMed DOI
Leis AA, Kofler M, Ross MA. The silent period in pure sensory neuronopathy. Muscle Nerve 1992;15(12):1345–8. doi: 10.1002/mus.880151209 PubMed DOI
Svilpauskaite J, Truffert A, Vaiciene N, Magistris MR. Cutaneous silent period in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2006;33(4):487–93. doi: 10.1002/mus.20496 PubMed DOI
Aurora SK, Ahmad BK, Aurora TK. Silent period abnormalities in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1998;21(9):1213–5. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199809)21:9<1213::AID-MUS16>3.0.CO;2-S PubMed DOI
Han JK, Oh K, Kim BJ, Koh SB, Kim JY, Park KW, et al. . Cutaneous silent period in patients with restless leg syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(8):1705–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.024 PubMed DOI
Stetkarova I, Kofler M, Leis AA. Cutaneous and mixed nerve silent periods in cervical syringomyelia. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001;112(1):78–85. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00486-7 PubMed DOI
Lo YL, Tan YE, Dan YF, Leoh TH, Tan SB, Tan CT, et al. . Cutaneous silent periods in the evaluation of cord compression in cervical spondylosis. J Neurol 2007;254(1):14–9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0142-6 PubMed DOI
Stetkarova I, Kofler M. Cutaneous silent periods in the assessment of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2009;34(1):34–42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f8be3 PubMed DOI
Leis AA, Kofler M, Stetkarova I, Stokic DS. The cutaneous silent period is preserved in cervical radiculopathy: significance for the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2011;20(2):236–9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1627-z PubMed DOI PMC
Kofler M. Functional organization of exteroceptive inhibition following nociceptive electrical fingertip stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114(6):973–80. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00060-9 PubMed DOI
Kofler M, Stetkarova I, Wissel J. Nociceptive EMG suppression in triceps brachii muscle in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115(5):1052–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.005 PubMed DOI
Kofler M, Valls-Solé J, Vasko P, Bocek V, Stetkarova I. Influence of limb temperature on cutaneous silent periods. Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125(9):1826–33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.018 PubMed DOI
Kofler M, Kumru H, Stetkarova I, Schindler C, Fuhr P. Muscle force up to 50% of maximum does not affect cutaneous silent periods in thenar muscles. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(9):2025–30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.06.005 PubMed DOI
Rodi Z, Springer C. Influence of muscle contraction and intensity of stimulation on the cutaneous silent period. Muscle Nerve 2011;43(3):324–8. doi: 10.1002/mus.21868 PubMed DOI
Haninec P, Kaiser R, Mencl L, Waldauf P. Usefulness of screening tools in the evaluation of long-term effectiveness of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury. BMC Neurol 2014;9(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Chew DJ, Murrell K, Carlstedt T, Shortland PJ. Segmental spinal root avulsion in the adult rat: a model to study avulsion injury pain J. Neurotrauma 2013;30(3):160–72. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2481 PubMed DOI
Pintér S, Gloviczki B, Szabó A, Márton G, Nógrádi A. Increased survival and reinnervation of cervical motoneurons by riluzole after avulsion of the C7 ventral root. J Neurotrauma 2010;27(12):2273–82. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1445 PubMed DOI PMC
Haninec P, Mencl L, Keiser R. End-to-side neurorrhaphy in brachial plexus reconstruction. J Neurosurg 2013;119(3):689–94. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.JNS122211 PubMed DOI
Gasparotti R, Lodoli G, Meoded A, Carletti F, Garozzo D, Ferraresi S. Feasibility of diffusion tensor tractography of brachial plexus injuries at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol 2013;48(2):104–12. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182775267 PubMed DOI
Vredeveld JW, Slooff BC, Blaauw G, Richards R. Validation of an electromyography and nerve conduction study protocol for the analysis of brachial plexus lesions in 184 consecutive patients with traumatic lesions. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 2001;2(3):123–8. doi: 10.1097/00131402-200103000-00002 PubMed DOI
O'Shea K, Feinberg JH, Wolfe SW. Imaging and electrodiagnostic work-up of acute adult brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011;36(9):747–59. doi: 10.1177/1753193411422313 PubMed DOI
Dikmen PY, Oge AE. Diagnostic use of dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in spinal disorders: Case series. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36(6):672–8. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000107 PubMed DOI PMC
Oberle J, Antoniadis G, Kast E, Richter HP. Evaluation of traumatic cervical nerve root injuries by intraoperative evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 2002;51(5):1182–8. discussion 1188–90. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200211000-00012 PubMed DOI
Trojaborg W. Clinical, electrophysiological, and myelographic studies of 9 patients with cervical spinal root avulsions: discrepancies between EMG and X-ray findings. Muscle Nerve 1994;17(8):913–22. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170811 PubMed DOI
Tsai PY, Chuang TY, Cheng H, Wu HM, Chang YC, Wang CP. Concordance and discrepancy between electrodiagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical root avulsion injuries. J Neurotrauma 2006;23(8):1274–81. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1274 PubMed DOI
Kofler M, Kronenberg MF, Brenneis C, Felber A, Saltuari L. Cutaneous silent periods in intramedullary spinal cord lesions. J Neurol Sci 2003;216(1):67–79. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00211-9 PubMed DOI
Lo YL, Tan YE, Dan YF, Fook-Chong S, Boolsambatra P, Yue WM, et al. . Role of spinal inhibitory mechanisms in whiplash injuries. J Neurotrauma 2007;24(6):1055–67. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0222 PubMed DOI
Vasko P, Bocek V, Mencl L, Stetkarova I. Cutaneous silent period in brachial plexus injury. Clinl Neurophysiol 2014;125(5)(Suppl):e42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.092 DOI
Liu Y, Zhou X, Ma J, Ge Y, Cao X. The diameters and numer of nerve fibers in spinal nerve roots. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(4):532–7. doi: 10.1179/1079026814Z.000000000273 PubMed DOI PMC
Alteration of cortical but not spinal inhibitory circuits in idiopathic scoliosis