Usefulness of screening tools in the evaluation of long-term effectiveness of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25487537
PubMed Central
PMC4264322
DOI
10.1186/s12883-014-0225-9
PII: s12883-014-0225-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electrocoagulation methods MeSH
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods standards MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pain Measurement methods standards MeSH
- Spinal Nerve Roots surgery MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Neuralgia diagnosis etiology surgery MeSH
- Pain, Intractable diagnosis etiology surgery MeSH
- Brachial Plexus injuries MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Despite high success rate of DREZ lesioning in the treatment of intractable central pain, there is still a significant incidence of patients without satisfactory post-operative effect. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term effect of DREZ lesioning using both a subjective assessment using a visual analog scale (VAS) to quantify residual pain and an assessment using the screening tool (painDETECT Questionnaire, PD-Q). METHODS: DREZ lesioning was performed in 52 patients from a total 441 cases with brachial plexus injury (11.8%) during a 17-year period (1995-2011). The effect of surgery was retrospectively assessed in 48 patients. RESULTS: A decrease in pre-operative pain by more than 75% (Group I) was achieved in 70.8% of patients and another 20.8% reported significant improvement (Group II). The surgery was unsucessful in 8.4% (Group III). We found a significant correlation between 'improvement' groups from both methods of assessments. Patients from Group I usually complained of residual nociceptive pain according to PD-Q, patients from Group II typically had pain of unclear origin, and all cases those in Group III suffered from neuropathic pain, Cramer's V = .66, P < .001. Overall, 66.7% of patients had resolved neuropathic pain, 20.8% patients had more serious complaints and may also suffer from residual neuropathic pain, while 12.5% had unresolved neuropathic pain. CONCLUSION: DREZ lesioning is a safe and effective method with success rates of about 90%. PD-Q scores correspond to subjective satisfaction with the surgery and it seems to be a suitable screening tool for finding patients with residual neuropathic pain after surgery.
See more in PubMed
Aichaoui F, Mertens P, Sindou M. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for pain after brachial plexus avulsion: Results with special emphasis on differential effects on the paroxysmal versus the continuous components. A prospective study in a 29-patient consecutive series. Pain. 2011;152(8):1923–1930. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.037. PubMed DOI
Sindou MP, Blondet E, Emery E, Mertens P. Microsurgical lesioning in the dorsal root entry zone for pain due to brachial plexus avulsion: A prospective series of 55 patients. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(6):1018–1028. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.1018. PubMed DOI
Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Concepts of nerve regeneration and repair applied to brachial plexus reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2006;26(4):230–244. doi: 10.1002/micr.20234. PubMed DOI
Ambler Z, Bednařík J, Keller O. Recommended method of treatment of neuropathic pain. Cesk Slov Neurol N. 2002;65(3):135–138.
Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, Haanpää M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Nurmikko T. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2009 revision. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:1113–e88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x. PubMed DOI
Bonilla G, Di Masi G, Battaglia D, Otero JM, Socolovsky M. Pain and brachial plexus lesions: evaluation of initial outcomes after reconstructive microsurgery and validation of a new pain severity scale. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153(1):171–176. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0709-3. PubMed DOI
Haninec P, Tomáš R, Sereghy T, Houšťava L. Drez thermocoagulation in treatment of deafferentation pain. Bolest. 2002;5(3):177–180.
Nashold BS, Ostdahl RH. Dorsal root entry zone lesions for pain relief. J Neurosurg. 1979;51:59–69. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.51.1.0059. PubMed DOI
Sindou M. Microsurgical DREZotomy (MDT) for pain, spasticity, and hyperactive bladder: A 20-year experience. Acta Neurochir. 1995;137(1–2):1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02188771. PubMed DOI
Tomáš R, Haninec P. Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) localization using direct spinal cord stimulation can improve results of the DREZ termocoagulation procedure for intractable pain relief. Pain. 2005;116:159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.015. PubMed DOI
Spaić M, Ivanović S, Slavik E, Antić B. DREZ (dorsal root entry zone) surgery for the treatment of the postherpetic intercostal neuralgia. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004;51(4):53–57. doi: 10.2298/ACI0404053S. PubMed DOI
Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tölle TR. painDETECT: A new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(10):1911–1920. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488. PubMed DOI
Chen HJ, Tu YK. Long term follow-up results of dorsal root entry zone lesions for intractable pain after brachial plexus avulsion injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;99:73–75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-35205-2_14. PubMed DOI
Ruiz-Juretschke F, García-Salazar F, García-Leal R, Fernández-Carballal C, Iza B, Garbizu JM, García-Duque S, Panadero T. Treatment of neuropathic deafferentation pain using DREZ lesions; long-term results. Neurologia. 2011;26(1):26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.10.003. PubMed DOI
Zheng Z, Hu Y, Tao W, Zhang X, Li Y. Dorsal root entry zone lesions for phantom limb pain with brachial plexus avulsion: A study of pain and phantom limb sensation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(4):249–255. doi: 10.1159/000225978. PubMed DOI
Campbell JN, Solomon CT, James CS. The Hopkins experience with lesions of the dorsal horn (Nashold’s operation) for pain from avulsion of the brachial plexus. Appl Neurophysiol. 1988;51:170–174. PubMed
Samii M, Bear-Henney S, Ludemann W, Tatagiba M, Blomer U. Treatment of Refractory Pain after Brachial Plexus Avulsion with Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesions. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:1269–1275. PubMed
Fazl M, Houlden DA, Kiss Z. Spinal cord mapping with evoked responses for accurate localization of the dorsal root entry zone. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:587–591. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.4.0587. PubMed DOI
Aly MM, Saitoh Y, Kishima H, Hosomi K, Yoshimine T. Importance of distinction between paroxysmal and continuous patterns of pain during evaluation of pain after brachial plexus injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153(2):437–438. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0874-4. PubMed DOI
Hallström H, Norrbrink C. Screening tools for neuropathic pain: Can they be of use in individuals with spinal cord injury? Pain. 2011;152(4):772–779. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.019. PubMed DOI
Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: A systematic literature review. Pain. 2013;154(1):95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.010. PubMed DOI
Karatas A, Caglar S, Savas A, Elhan A, Erdogan A. Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal cervical rootlets and dorsal root entry zones. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(2):195–199. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0425-y. PubMed DOI
Gilbert A, Pivato G, Kheiralla T. Long-term results of primary repair of brachial plexus lesions in children. Microsurgery. 2006;26(4):334–342. doi: 10.1002/micr.20248. PubMed DOI
Ali M, Saitoh Y, Oshino S, Hosomi K, Kishima H, Morris S, Shibata M, Yoshimine T. Differential efficacy of electric motor cortex stimulation and lesioning of the dorsal root entry zone for continuous vs paroxysmal pain after brachial plexus avulsion. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1252–1257. PubMed
Carlstedt T, Anand P, Htut M, Misra P, Svensson M. Restoration of hand function and so called “breathing arm” after intraspinal repair of C5-T1 brachial plexus avulsion injury, Case report. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.5.8. PubMed DOI
Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Pain after avulsion injuries and complete palsy of the brachial plexus: the possible role of nonavulsed roots in pain generation. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5):1104–1113. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325872.37258.12. PubMed DOI
Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF, Loure Iro Chaves DP. Sensory disturbances and pain complaints after brachial plexus root injury: A prospective study involving 150 adult patients. Microsurgery. 2011;31(2):93–97. doi: 10.1002/micr.20832. PubMed DOI
Tomycz ND, Moossy JJ. Follow-up 26 years after dorsal root entry zone thermocoagulation for brachial plexus avulsion and phantom limb pain. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):196–199. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091520. PubMed DOI
Preserved cutaneous silent period in cervical root avulsion