Four diagnostic modalities are used to image the following internal carotid artery: digital subtraction angiography (DSA), duplex ultrasound (DUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The aim of this article is to describe the potentials of these techniques and to discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Invasive DSA is still considered the gold standard and is an indivisible part of the carotid stenting procedure. DUS is an inexpensive but operator-dependent tool with limited visibility of the carotid artery course. Conversely, CTA and MRA allow assessment of the carotid artery from the aortic arch to intracranial parts. The disadvantages of CTA are radiation and iodine contrast medium administration. MRA is without radiation but contrast-enhanced MRA is more accurate than noncontrast MRA. The choice of methods depends on the clinical indications and the availability of methods in individual centers. However, the general approach to patient with suspected carotid artery stenosis is to first perform DUS and then other noninvasive methods such as CTA, MRA, or transcranial Doppler US.

Complex Cardiovascular Centre for Adult Patients Cardiology Clinic of the 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Radiology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Collaborators N ASCET; North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis N Engl J Med 19913257445–453. PubMed

ECST Collaborative Group . Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1379–1387. PubMed

Williams M A, Nicolaides A N. Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1987;1(2):91–96. PubMed

Rothwell P M, Gibson R J, Slattery J, Sellar R J, Warlow C P. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994;25(12):2435–2439. PubMed

Davies K N, Humphrey P R. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(9):967–972. PubMed PMC

Elgersma O E, Buijs P C, Wüst A F, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom B C, Mali W P. Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1999;213(3):777–783. PubMed

Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R. et al.Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology. 2005;236(1):204–213. PubMed

Heran N S, Song J K, Namba K, Smith W, Niimi Y, Berenstein A. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(2):330–332. PubMed PMC

Tanabe J Tanaka M Kadooka K Hadeishi H Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of carotid atheromatous plaque J Neurointerv Surg 2015. (e-pub ahead of print) PubMed

Polak J F, Shemanski L, O'Leary D H. et al.Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998;208(3):649–654. PubMed

Stein J H Korcarz C E Hurst R T et al.Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force J Am Soc Echocardiogr 200821293–111., quiz 189–190 PubMed

Grant E G, Benson C B, Moneta G L. et al.Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q. 2003;19(4):190–198. PubMed

Wardlaw J M Chappell F M Stevenson M et al.Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK Health Technol Assess 20061030iii–iv., ix–x, 1–182 PubMed

Sarkar S, Ghosh S, Ghosh S K, Collier A. Role of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in stroke. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(985):683–689. PubMed PMC

Shalhoub J, Owen D RJ, Gauthier T, Monaco C, Leen E LS, Davies A H. The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in carotid arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(4):381–387. PubMed

Sun K, Li K, Han R. et al.Evaluation of high-pitch dual-source CT angiography for evaluation of coronary and carotid-cerebrovascular arteries. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(3):398–406. PubMed

Bivard A, Spratt N, Levi C, Parsons M. Perfusion computer tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 11):3408–3416. PubMed

Weber J, Veith P, Jung B. et al.MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25(1):41–48. PubMed

van Everdingen K J, van der Grond J, Kappelle L J, Ramos L M, Mali W P. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke. Stroke. 1998;29(9):1783–1790. PubMed

Chen F, Ni Y C. Magnetic resonance diffusion-perfusion mismatch in acute ischemic stroke: An update. World J Radiol. 2012;4(3):63–74. PubMed PMC

Maeda M, Yuh W TC, Ueda T. et al.Severe occlusive carotid artery disease: hemodynamic assessment by MR perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(1):43–51. PubMed

Trivedi R A, Green H A, U-King-Im J. et al.Cerebral haemodynamic disturbances in patients with moderate carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(1):52–57. PubMed

Jaff M R, Goldmakher G V, Lev M H, Romero J M. Imaging of the carotid arteries: the role of duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance arteriography, and computerized tomographic arteriography. Vasc Med. 2008;13(4):281–292. PubMed

Johnston D C, Goldstein L B. Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology. 2001;56(8):1009–1015. PubMed

Qureshi A I, Suri M F, Ali Z. et al.Role of conventional angiography in evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound in general practice. Stroke. 2001;32(10):2287–2291. PubMed

Brott T G, Halperin J L, Abbara S. et al.2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/ SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Vasc Med. 2011;16(1):35–77. PubMed

Peak systolic velocity ratio for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis correlated with plaque morphology: substudy results of the ANTIQUE study