Linking in Vitro Effects and Detected Organic Micropollutants in Surface Water Using Mixture-Toxicity Modeling
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26516785
DOI
10.1021/acs.est.5b04083
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biotest MeSH
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu analýza toxicita MeSH
- ekotoxikologie metody MeSH
- embryo nesavčí účinky léků MeSH
- NF-kappa B MeSH
- organické látky analýza toxicita MeSH
- pregnanový X receptor MeSH
- receptory aromatických uhlovodíků metabolismus MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny metabolismus MeSH
- řeky chemie MeSH
- ryby embryologie MeSH
- steroidní receptory metabolismus MeSH
- techniky in vitro MeSH
- teoretické modely MeSH
- testy genotoxicity metody MeSH
- testy toxicity metody MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu MeSH
- NF-kappa B MeSH
- organické látky MeSH
- pregnanový X receptor MeSH
- receptory aromatických uhlovodíků MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny MeSH
- steroidní receptory MeSH
Surface water can contain countless organic micropollutants, and targeted chemical analysis alone may only detect a small fraction of the chemicals present. Consequently, bioanalytical tools can be applied complementary to chemical analysis to detect the effects of complex chemical mixtures. In this study, bioassays indicative of activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR), activation of the estrogen receptor (ER), adaptive stress responses to oxidative stress (Nrf2), genotoxicity (p53) and inflammation (NF-κB) and the fish embryo toxicity test were applied along with chemical analysis to water extracts from the Danube River. Mixture-toxicity modeling was applied to determine the contribution of detected chemicals to the biological effect. Effect concentrations for between 0 to 13 detected chemicals could be found in the literature for the different bioassays. Detected chemicals explained less than 0.2% of the biological effect in the PXR activation, adaptive stress response, and fish embryo toxicity assays, while five chemicals explained up to 80% of ER activation, and three chemicals explained up to 71% of AhR activation. This study highlights the importance of fingerprinting the effects of detected chemicals.
Department of Environmental Toxicology University of California Davis California 95616 United States
Smart Water Research Centre School of Environment Griffith University Southport QLD 4222 Australia
UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research 04318 Leipzig Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org