Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26593741
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004
PII: S0300-5712(15)30069-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Broad spectrum LED curing light, Bulk fill resin based composites, Depth of cure, Knoop microhardness,
- MeSH
- Acrylic Resins chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Dental Stress Analysis MeSH
- Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives instrumentation methods MeSH
- Methacrylates chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Polymerization radiation effects MeSH
- Polyurethanes chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Surface Properties radiation effects MeSH
- Composite Resins chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Curing Lights, Dental * MeSH
- Materials Testing MeSH
- Dental Materials chemistry radiation effects MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Acrylic Resins MeSH
- Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate MeSH
- Foundation composite resin MeSH Browser
- Methacrylates MeSH
- Polyurethanes MeSH
- Composite Resins MeSH
- SonicFill MeSH Browser
- Surefil SDR Flow MeSH Browser
- Tetric EvoCeram MeSH Browser
- Vivadent MeSH Browser
- X-tra fil composite resin MeSH Browser
- Dental Materials MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To measure the Knoop microhardness at the bottom of four posterior resin-based composites (RBCs): Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent), SureFil SDR flow (DENTSPLY), SonicFill (Kerr), and x-tra fil (Voco). METHODS: The RBCs were expressed into metal rings that were 2, 4, or 6-mm thick with a 4-mm internal diameter at 30°C. The uncured specimens were covered by a Mylar strip and a Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent) polywave(®) LED light-curing unit was used in high power setting for 20s. The specimens were then removed and placed immediately on a Knoop microhardness-testing device and the microhardness was measured at 9 points across top and bottom surfaces of each specimen. Five specimens were made for each condition. RESULTS: As expected, for each RBC there was no significant difference in the microhardness values at the top of the 2, 4 and 6-mm thick specimens. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest resin, but was the only resin that had no significant difference between the KHN values at the bottom of the 2 and 4-mm (Mixed Model ANOVA p<0.05). Although the KHN of SureFil SDR Flow was only marginally significantly different between the 2 and 6-mm thickness, the bottom at 6-mm was only 59% of the hardness measured at the top. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights that clinicians need to consider how the depth of cure was evaluated when determining the depth of cure. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest material and, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, this RBC should be overlaid with a conventional resin.
Dental Clinical Sciences Dalhousie University P O Box 15000 Halifax NS B3H4R2 Canada
King Saud University Restorative Dental Sciences P O Box 60169 Riyadh 11545 Saudi Arabia
References provided by Crossref.org