Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26593741
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004
PII: S0300-5712(15)30069-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Broad spectrum LED curing light, Bulk fill resin based composites, Depth of cure, Knoop microhardness,
- MeSH
- akrylové pryskyřice chemie účinky záření MeSH
- analýza zatížení zubů MeSH
- bisfenol A-glycidyl methakrylát chemie účinky záření MeSH
- dentální adheziva tuhnoucí světlem přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- methakryláty chemie účinky záření MeSH
- polymerizace účinky záření MeSH
- polyurethany chemie účinky záření MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti účinky záření MeSH
- složené pryskyřice chemie účinky záření MeSH
- stomatologické polymerizační lampy * MeSH
- testování materiálů MeSH
- zubní materiály chemie účinky záření MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- akrylové pryskyřice MeSH
- bisfenol A-glycidyl methakrylát MeSH
- Foundation composite resin MeSH Prohlížeč
- methakryláty MeSH
- polyurethany MeSH
- složené pryskyřice MeSH
- SonicFill MeSH Prohlížeč
- Surefil SDR Flow MeSH Prohlížeč
- Tetric EvoCeram MeSH Prohlížeč
- Vivadent MeSH Prohlížeč
- X-tra fil composite resin MeSH Prohlížeč
- zubní materiály MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To measure the Knoop microhardness at the bottom of four posterior resin-based composites (RBCs): Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent), SureFil SDR flow (DENTSPLY), SonicFill (Kerr), and x-tra fil (Voco). METHODS: The RBCs were expressed into metal rings that were 2, 4, or 6-mm thick with a 4-mm internal diameter at 30°C. The uncured specimens were covered by a Mylar strip and a Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent) polywave(®) LED light-curing unit was used in high power setting for 20s. The specimens were then removed and placed immediately on a Knoop microhardness-testing device and the microhardness was measured at 9 points across top and bottom surfaces of each specimen. Five specimens were made for each condition. RESULTS: As expected, for each RBC there was no significant difference in the microhardness values at the top of the 2, 4 and 6-mm thick specimens. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest resin, but was the only resin that had no significant difference between the KHN values at the bottom of the 2 and 4-mm (Mixed Model ANOVA p<0.05). Although the KHN of SureFil SDR Flow was only marginally significantly different between the 2 and 6-mm thickness, the bottom at 6-mm was only 59% of the hardness measured at the top. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights that clinicians need to consider how the depth of cure was evaluated when determining the depth of cure. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest material and, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, this RBC should be overlaid with a conventional resin.
Dental Clinical Sciences Dalhousie University P O Box 15000 Halifax NS B3H4R2 Canada
King Saud University Restorative Dental Sciences P O Box 60169 Riyadh 11545 Saudi Arabia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org