We studied the response of the barn owl annual productivity to the common vole population numbers and variability to test the effects of environmental stochasticity on their life histories. Current theory predicts that temporal environmental variability can affect long-term nonlinear responses (e.g., production of young) both positively and negatively, depending on the shape of the relationship between the response and environmental variables. At the level of the Czech Republic, we examined the shape of the relationship between the annual sum of fledglings (annual productivity) and vole numbers in both non-detrended and detrended data. At the districts' level, we explored whether the degree of synchrony (measured by the correlation coefficient) and the strength of the productivity response increase (measured by the regression coefficient) in areas with higher vole population variability measured by the s-index. We found that the owls' annual productivity increased linearly with vole numbers in the Czech Republic. Furthermore, based on district data, we also found that synchrony between dynamics in owls' reproductive output and vole numbers increased with vole population variability. However, the strength of the response was not affected by the vole population variability. Additionally, we have shown that detrending remarkably increases the Taylor's exponent b relating variance to mean in vole time series, thereby reversing the relationship between the coefficient of variation and the mean. This shift was not responsible for the increased synchrony with vole population variability. Instead, we suggest that higher synchrony could result from high food specialization of owls on the common vole in areas with highly fluctuating vole populations.

Department of Development Studies Faculty of Science Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Institute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Brno Czech Republic

TYTO občanské sdružení Nenakonice Věrovany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Cohen D (1993) Fitness in random environments In: Yoshimura J, Clark C, editors, Adaptation in Stochastic Environments, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 98, Berlin: Springer; pp. 8–25.

Lande R, Engen S, Saether B-R (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ruel JJ, Ayres MP (1999) Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 361–366. PubMed

Barraquand F, Hušek J (2014) Covariation between mean vole density and variability drives the numerical response of storks to vole prey. Population Ecology 56: 551–553.

Hušek J, Adamík P, Albrecht T, Cepák J, Kania W, Mikolášková E, et al. (2013) Cyclicity and variability in prey dynamics strengthens predator numerical response: the effects of vole fluctuations on white stork productivity. Population Ecology 55: 363–375.

Barraquand F, Høye TT, Henden J-A, Yoccoz NG, Gilg O, Schmidt NM, et al. (2014) Demographic responses of a site-faithful and territorial predator to its fluctuating prey: long-tailed skuas and arctic lemmings. Journal of Animal Ecology 83:375–387. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12140 PubMed DOI

Tkadlec E, Stenseth NC (2001) A new geographical gradient in vole population dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 1547–1552. PubMed PMC

Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 232–237. PubMed

Yang LH, Bastow JL, Spence KO, Wright AN (2008) What can we learn from resource pulses? Ecology 89: 621–634. PubMed

Yang LH, Edwards KF, Byrnes JE, Bastow JL, Wright AN, Spence KO (2010) A meta-analysis of resource pulse–consumer interactions. Ecological Monographs 80: 125–151.

Baines D, Richardson M (2013) Hen harriers on a Scottish grouse moor: multiple factors predict breeding density and productivity. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 1397–1405.

Yoccoz NG, Bustnes JO, Bangjord G, Skaare JU (2009) Reproduction and survival of tawny owls in relation to persistent organic pollutants. Environment International 35: 107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.014 PubMed DOI

Brommer JE, Pietiäinen H, Kolunen H (2002) Reproduction and survival in a variable environment: Ural Owls (Strix uralensis) and the three-year vole cycle. The Auk 119: 544–550.

Kontiainen P, Pietiäinen H, Huttunen K, Karell P, Kolunen H, Brommer JE (2009) Aggressive Ural owl mothers recruit more offspring. Behavioral Ecology 6: 789–796.

Charter M, Izhaki I, Leshem Y, Meyrom K, Roulin A (2015) Relationship between diet and reproductive success in the Israeli barn owl. Journal of Arid Environments 122: 59–63.

Valkama J, Korpimäki E, Wiehn J, Pakkanen T (2002) Inter-clutch egg size variation in kestrels Falco tinnunculus: seasonal decline under fluctuating food conditions. Journal of avian biology 33: 426–432.

Lindström E (1988) Reproductive effort in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes, and future supply of a fluctuating prey. Oikos 52: 115–119.

Angerbjörn A, Arvidson B, Norén E, Strömgren L (1991) The effect of winter food on reproduction in the arctic fox, Alopex lagopus: a field experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 705–714.

Angerbjörn A, Tannerfeldt M, Erlinge S (1999) Predator-prey relationships: arctic foxes and lemmings. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 34–49.

Sundell J (2003) Reproduction of the least weasel in captivity: basic observations and the influence of food availability. Acta Theriologica 48: 59–72.

Linnerud M, Saether B-E, Grotan V, Engen S, Noble DG, Freckleton RP (2013) Interspecific differences in stochastic population dynamics explains variation in Taylor's temporal power law. Oikos 122: 1207–1216.

Taylor I (1994) Barn owls Predator-prey relationships and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bond G, Burnside NG, Metcalfe DJ, Scott DM, Blamire J (2005) The effects of land-use and landscape structure on barn owl (Tyto alba) breeding success in southern England, UK. Landscape Ecology 20: 555–566.

de Bruijn O (1994) Population ecology and conservation of the barn owl Tyto alba in farmland habitats in Liemers and Achterhoek (The Netherlands). Ardea 82: 1–109.

Marti CD (1994) Barn owl reproduction: patterns and variation near the limit of the species' distribution. The Condor 96: 468–484.

Bernard N, Michelat D, Raoul F, Quere JP, Delattre P, Giraudoux P (2010) Dietary response of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) to large variations in populations of common voles (Microtus arvalis) and European water voles (Arvicola terrestris). Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 416–426.

Jaksić FM, Jiménez JE, Castro SA, Feinsinger P (1992) Numerical and functional response of predators to a long-term decline in mammalian prey at a semi-arid Neotropical site. Oecologia 89: 90–101. PubMed

Honer MR (1963) Observations on the barn owl in the Netherlands in relation to its ecology and population fluctuations. Ardea 51: 158–195.

Toms MP (1994) Small mammals in agricultural landscapes. Raptor 21: 57–59.

Schönfeld M, Girbig G (1975) Beiträge zur Brutbiologie der Schleiereule, Tyto alba, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Abhängigkeit von der Feldmausdichte. Hercynia N. F., Leipzig 12: 257–319.

Bryja J, Nesvadbová J, Heroldová M, Jánová E, Losík J, Trebatická L, et al. (2005) Common vole (Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 1391–1399.

Gaston KJ, McArdle BH (1994) The temporal variability of animal abundances: measures, methods and patterns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 345: 335–358.

Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2: 111–120.

Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach New York: Springer.

R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Gouveia A, Bejček V, Flousek J, Sedláček F, Šťastný K, Zima J, et al. (2015) Long-term pattern of population dynamics in the field vole from central Europe: cyclic pattern with amplitude dampening. Population Ecology 57: 581–589.

Royama T (1992) Analytical population dynamics London: Chapman and Hall.

McArdle BH, Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1990) Variation in the size of animal populations: patterns, problems and artefacts. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 439–454.

Boutin S, Wauters LA, McAdam AG, Humphries MM, Tost G, Dhondt AA (2006) Anticipatory reproduction and population growth in seed predators. Science 314: 1928–1930. PubMed

White TCR (2013) ‘Anticipatory’ reproduction by small mammals cannot succeed without enhanced maternal access to protein food. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 40: 332–336.

Salamolard M, Butet A, Leroux A, Bretagnolle V (2000) Responses of an avian predator to variations in prey density at a temperate latitude. Ecology 81: 2428–2441.

Millon A, Bretagnolle V (2008) Predator population dynamics under a cyclic prey regime: numerical responses, demographic parameters and growth rates. Oikos 117: 1500–1510.

Tkadlec E, Zbořil J, Losík J, Gregor P, Lisická L (2006) Winter climate and plant productivity predict abundances of small herbivores in central Europe. Climate Research 32: 99–108.

Pertoldi C, Faurby S, Reed DH, Knape J, Bjorklund M, Lundberg P, et al. (2014) Scaling of the mean and variance of population dynamics under fluctuating regimes. Theory in Bioscences 133: 165–173. PubMed

Lisická L, Losík J, Zejda J, Heroldová M, Nesvadbová J, Tkadlec E (2007) Measurement error in a burrow index to monitor relative population size in the common vole. Folia Zoologica 56: 169–176.

White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory.