Traditional woodland management created a mosaic of differently aged patches providing favorable conditions for a variety of arthropods. After abandonment of historical ownership patterns and traditional management and the deliberate transformation to high forest after World War II, large forest areas became darker and more homogeneous. This had significant negative consequences for biodiversity. An important question is whether even small-scale habitat structures maintained by different levels of canopy openness in abandoned coppiced forest may constitute conditions suitable for forest as well as open habitat specialists. We investigated the effect of canopy openness in former traditionally coppiced woodlands on the species richness, functional diversity, activity density, conservation value, and degree of rareness of epigeic spiders. In each of the eight studied locations, 60-m-long transect was established consisting of five pitfall traps placed at regular 15 m intervals along the gradient. Spiders were collected from May to July 2012. We recorded 90 spider species, including high proportions of xeric specialists (40%) and red-listed threatened species (26%). The peaks of conservation indicators, as well as spider community abundance, were shifted toward more open canopies. On the other hand, functional diversity peaked at more closed canopies followed by a rapid decrease with increasing canopy openness. Species richness was highest in the middle of the canopy openness gradient, suggesting an ecotone effect. Ordinations revealed that species of conservation concern tended to be associated with sparse and partly opened canopy. The results show that the various components of biodiversity peaked at different levels of canopy openness. Therefore, the restoration and suitable forest management of such conditions will retain important diversification of habitats in formerly coppiced oak forest stands. We indicate that permanent presence of small-scale improvements could be suitable conservation tools to prevent the general decline of woodland biodiversity in the intensified landscape of Central Europe.

Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Forest Ecology Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Fisheries Hydrobiology and Apiculture Faculty of Agronomy Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P . Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2000; 132: 39–50.

Warren MS, Key RS. Woodlands: Past, present and potential for insects In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (Eds.). The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats. London: Academic Press, 155–212; 1991.

Vera FWM. Grazing Ecology and Forest History. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2000.

Fartmann T, Müller C, Poniatowski D. Effects of coppicing on butterfly communities of woodlands. Biological Conservation 2013; 159: 396–404.

Altman J, Hédl R, Szabó P, Mazůrek P, Riedl V, Müllerová J, et al. Tree-rings mirror management legacy: dramatic response of standard oaks to past coppicing in Central Europe. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e55770 10.1371/journal.pone.0055770 PubMed DOI PMC

Buckley GP. Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. Springer Science & Business Media; 1992.

Müllerová J, Szabó P, Hédl R. The rise and fall of traditional forest management in southern Moravia: A history of the past 700 years. Forest Ecology and Management 2014; 331: 104–115. PubMed PMC

Müllerová J, Hédl R, Szabó P. Coppice abandonment and its implications for species diversity in forest vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management 2015; 343: 88–100. PubMed PMC

Hédl R, Kopecký M., Komárek J. Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Diversity and Distributions 2010; 16: 267–276.

Sebek P, Bace R, Bartos M, Benes J, Chlumska Z, Dolezal J, et al. Does a minimal intervention approach threaten the biodiversity of protected areas? A multi-taxa short-term response to intervention in temperate oak-dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2015; 358: 80–89.

Spitzer L, Konvicka M, Beneš J, Tropek R, Tuf IH, Tufová J. Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biological Conservation 2008; 141: 827–837.

Vrška T, Adam D, Hort L, Odehnalová P, Horal D, Král K. Dynamika vývoje pralesovitých rezervací v České republice. Sv. II, Lužní lesy–Cahnov-Soutok, Ranšpurk, Jiřina. Prague: Academia; 2006. (in czech).

Vrška T. Developmental dynamics of virgin forest reserves in the Czech Republic Floodplain forests. Prague: Academia; 2006.

Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 1994; 371: 65–66.

Thomas CD. Dispersal and extinction infragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2000; 267: 139–145. PubMed PMC

Horák J, Vodka S, Kout J, Halda JP, Bogusch P, Pech P. Biodiversity of most dead wood-dependent organisms in thermophilic temperate oak woodlands thrives on diversity of open landscape structures. Forest Ecology and Management 2014; 315: 80–85.

Miklín J, Čížek L. Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Journal of Nature Conservation 2014; 22: 35–41.

Hermy M, Verheyen K. Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Sustainability and Diversity of Forest Ecosystems 2007; 22: 361–371.

Van Calster H, Baeten L, Verheyen K, De Keersmaeker L, Dekeyser S, Rogister JE, et al. Diverging effect of overstorey conversion scenarios on the underground vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2008; 256: 519–528.

Warren MS. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. Journal of Applied Ecology 1987; 24: 499–513.

Beneš J, Čížek O, Dovala J, Konvička M. Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: the story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and management 2006; 237: 353–365.

Konvicka M, Novak J, Benes J, Fric Z, Bradley J, Keil P, et al. The last population of the Woodland Brown butterfly (Lopinga achine) in the Czech Republic: habitat use, demography and site management. Journal of Insect Conservation 2008; 12: 549–560.

Vodka S, Konvicka M, Cizek L. Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management. Journal of Insect Conservation 2009; 13: 553–562.

Šebek P, Altman J, Plátek M, Čížek L. Is active management the key to the conservation of saproxylic biodiversity? Pollarding promotes the formation of tree hollows. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e60456 10.1371/journal.pone.0060456 PubMed DOI PMC

Horák J, Rébl K. The species richness of click beetles in ancient pasture woodland benefits from a high level of sun exposure. Journal of Insect Conservation 2013; 17: 307–318.

Hill D, Roberts P, Stork N. Densities and biomass of invertebrates in stands of rotationally managed coppice woodland. Biological Conservation 1990; 51: 167–176.

Hansson L. Traditional management of forests: plant and bird community responses to alternative restoration of oak–hazel woodland in Sweden: Biodiversity and Conservation 2010; 10: 1865–1873.

Settele J, Dover J, Dolek M, Konvička M. Butterflies of European ecosystems: impact of land use and options for conservation management In: Settele J., Shreeve T., Konvička M., Van Dyck H. (Eds.), Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 353–370; 2009.

Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, user’s manual and program documentation. New York: Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies; 1999.

Vodka Š, Čížek L. The effects of edge-interior and understorey-canopy gradients on the distribution of saproxylic beetles in a temperate lowland forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2013; 304: 33–41.

Hansen TA, Spies FJ, Swanson JL. Conserving Biodiversity in Managed Forests. BioScience 1991; 41: 382–392.

Basset Y, Charles E, Hammond DS, Brown VK. Short-term effects of canopy openness on insect herbivores in a rain forest in Guyana. Journal of Applied Ecology 2001; 38: 1045–1058.

Paletto A, Tosi V. Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. European Journal of Forest Research 2009; 128: 265–272.

Silbernagel J, Moeur M. Modeling canopy openness and understory gap patterns based on image analysis nad mapped tree data. Forest Ecology and Management 2001; 149: 217–233.

Wise DH. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

Pearce JL, Venier LA, Eccles G, Pedlar J, McKenney D. Influence of habitat and microhabitat on epigeal spider (Araneae) assemblages in four stand types. Biodiversity and Conservation 2004; 13: 1305–1334.

Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J, Giller PS, Kelly TC. The influence of open space on ground-dwelling spider assemblages within plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2006; 237: 404–417.

Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J, Giller PS, Smith GF. Structural indicators of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. Forest Ecology and management 2005; 212: 171–183.

Entling W, Schmidt MH, Bacher S, Brandl R, Nentwig W. Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2007; 16: 440–448.

Purchart L, Tuf IH, Hula V, Suchomel J. Arthropod assemblages in Norway spruce monocultures during a forest cycle—A multi-taxa approach. Forest Ecology and Management 2013; 306: 42–51.

Muff P, Kropf C, Frick H, Nentwig W, Schmidt-Entling MH. Co-existence of divergent communities at natural boundaries: spider (Arachnida: Araneae) diversity across an alpine timberline. Insect Conservation and Diversity 2009; 2: 36–44.

Mupepele AN, Müller T, Dittrich M, Floren A. Are Temperate Canopy Spiders Tree-Species Specific? PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e86571 10.1371/journal.pone.0086571 PubMed DOI PMC

Wise DH, Chen B. Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider. Oecologia 1999; 121: 129–137. PubMed

Schuldt A, Both S, Bruelheide H, Härdtle W, Schmid B, Zhou H, et al. Predator diversity and abundance provide little support for the enemies hypothesis in forests of high tree diversity. PLoS ONE 2011; e22905 10.1371/journal.pone.0022905 PubMed DOI PMC

Nyffeler M, Benz G. Spiders in natural pest control: A review. Journal of Applied Entomology 1987; 103: 321–339.

Cardoso P, Pekar S, Jocque R, Coddington JA. Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. Plos One 2011; 6 e21710 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710 PubMed DOI PMC

Sanders D, Vogel E, Knop E. Individual and species specific traits explain niche size and functional role in spiders as generalist predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 2015; 84: 134–142. 10.1111/1365-2656.12271 PubMed DOI

Mackovčin P. Protected areas of the Czech Republic, Vol. IX AOPK Czech Republic: Ecocentrum; Brno; 2007.

Quitt E. Climatic regions of Czechoslovakia. Studia Geographica 1971; 16: 1–73.

Roberts M. Spiders of Britain & Northern Europe. London: Harper Collins Publishers; 1995.

Buchar J, Růžička V. Catalogue of Spiders of the Czech Republic. Prague: Peres; 2002.

Gonsamo A, D’odorico P, Pellikka P. Measuring fractional forest canopy element cover and openness—definitions and methodologies revisited . Oikos 2013; 122: 1283–1291.

Heimer S, Nentwig W. Spinnen Mitteleuropas. Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey; 1991.

Nentwig W, Hanngi A, Kropf C, Blick T. Spinnen Mitteleuropas/Central European Spiders. An internet identification key. Available: http://www.araneae.unibe.ch. Accessed 7 July 2015.

Krauss J, Alfert T, Steffan-Dewenter L. Habitat area but not habitat age determines wild bee richness in limestone quarries. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009; 46: 194–202.

Samways M, McGeoch MA, New TR. Insect Conservation: A Handbook of Approaches and Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

Tropek R, Kadlec T, Karešová P, Spitzer L, Kočárek P, Malenovský I, et al. Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 2010; 47: 139–147.

Tropek R, Cerna I, Straka J, Kadlec T, Pech P, Tichanek F, et al. Restoration management of fly ash deposits crucially influence their conservation potential for terrestrial arthropods. Ecological Engineering 2014; 73: 45–52.

Košulič O, Michalko R, Hula V. Recent artificial vineyard terraces as a refuge for rare and endangered spiders in a modern agricultural landscape. Ecological Engineering 2014; 68: 137–154.

Růžička V, Buchar J. Supplement to the Catalogue of Spiders of the Czech Republic 2001–2007. Sborník Oblastního muzea v Mostě, Řada přírodovědná 2008; 29–30: 3–32.

Řezáč M, Kůrka A, Růžička V, Heneberg P. Red List of Czech spiders: 3rd edition, adjusted according to evidence-based national conservation priorities. Biologia 2015; 70: 645–666

Kasal P, Kaláb V. Arachnobase of the Czech Spiders. Available: http://www.arachnobaze.cz/en/info. Accessed 20 June 2015.

R Development Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna: 2015. Available: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 March 2015.

ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. Cannoco 5. Software for multivariate data exploration, testing, and summarization. Netherlands; 2012.

Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC. BAT–Biodiversity Assessment Tools, an R package for the measurement and estimation of alpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2015; 6: 215–236.

Swenson NG. Phylogenetic and functional ecology in R. Springer; 2014.

Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations. Journal of Statistical Software 2006; 15: 1–11.

Pekár S, Brabec M. Modern analysis of biological data. Muni Press: 2. Linear models with correlation in R; 2012.

Pekár S, Brabec M. Modern analysis of biological data. Scientia: 1. Generalized linear models in R; 2009.

Šmilauer P, Lepš J. 2014. Multivariete analysis of ecological data using Canoco 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

Kůrka A, Řezáč M, Macek R, Dolanský J. Spiders of the Czech Republic. Prague: Academia; 2015.

Ugurlu E, Rolecek J, Bergmeier E. Oak woodland vegetation of Turkey—a first overview based on multivariate statistics. Applied Vegetation Science 2012; 15: 590–608.

Niemela J, Haila Y, Punttila P. The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 1996; 19: 352–368.

Pearce JL, Venier LA. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: A review. Ecological Indicators 2006; 6: 780–793.

Samu F, Lengyel G, Szita E, Bidló A, Ódor P. The effect of forest stand characteristics on spider diversity and species composition in deciduous-coniferous mixed forests. Journal of Arachnology 2014; 42: 135–141.

Denno RF, Finke DL, Langellotto GA. Direct and Indirect Effects of Vegetation Structure and Habitat Complexity on Predator-Prey and Predator-Predator Interactions In Barbosa P, Castellanos I. Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions. Oxford University Press; 2005.

Buchar J . Komentierte Artenliste der Spinnen Böhmens (Araneida). Acta Universitatis Carolinae—Biologica 1993; 36: 383–428.

Horváth R, Magura T, Péter G, Tóthmérész B. Edge effect on weevils and spiders. Web Ecology 2002; 3: 43–47.

Larrivée M, Drapeau P, Fahrig L. Edge effects created by wildfire and clear-cutting on boreal forest ground-dwelling spiders. Forest Ecology and Management 2008; 255: 1434–1445.

Ziesche TM, Roth M. Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: What makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? Forest Ecology and Management 2008; 255: 738–752

Greenstone MH. Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia 1984; 62: 299–304. PubMed

Mcnett BJ, Rypstra AL. Habitat selection in a large orb-weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution. Ecological Entomology 2000; 25: 423–432.

Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Determinants of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. habitat structure. Ecological Entomology 2007; 32: 113–122.

McIver JD, Parsons GL, Moldenke AR. Litter spider succession after clear-cutting in a western coniferous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1992; 22: 984–992.

Wagner JD, Toft S, Wise DH. Spatial stratification in litter depth by forest-floor spiders. Journal of Arachnology 2003; 31: 28–39.

Fuller RJ, Warren MS. Coppiced Woodlands: Their Management for Wildlife. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council; 1990.

Konvicka M, Cizek L, Benes J. Ohrožený hmyz nížinných lesů: ochrana a management. Olomouc: Sagittaria; 2004. (in czech).

Klessmann C, Held A, Rathmann M, Ragwitz M. Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? Energy Policy 2011; 39: 7637–7657.

Vacik R, Zlatanov T, Trajkov P, Dekanic S. Role of coppice forest in maintaining forest biodiversity. Silva Balcanica 2009; 10: 35–45.

Abadjiev S. An Atlas of the Distribution of the Butterflies in Bulgaria (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers; 2001.

Currylow AF, MacGowan BJ, Williams RN. Short-Term Forest Management Effects on a Long-Lived Ectotherm. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e40473 10.1371/journal.pone.0040473 PubMed DOI PMC

Rancka B, von Proschwitz T, Hylander K, Götmark F. Conservation Thinning in Secondary Forest: Negative but Mild Effect on Land Molluscs in Closed-Canopy Mixed Oak Forest in Sweden. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0120085 10.1371/journal.pone.0120085 PubMed DOI PMC

Ausden M. Habitat Management for Conservation—A Handbook of Techniques. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

Řezáč M, Heneberg P. Conservation status of the only representative of infraorder Mygalomorphae (Araneae) in cultivated regions of Central Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation 2014; 18: 523–537.

Bicknell JE, Struebig MJ, Edwards DP, Davies ZG. Improved timber harvest techniques maintain biodiversity in tropical forests. Current Biology 2014; 24: 1119–1120. PubMed

Brunet J, Fritz Ö, Richnau G. Biodiversity in European beech forests—a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecological Bulletins 2010; 53: 77–94.