Comparison of tau-fluvalinate, acrinathrin, and amitraz effects on susceptible and resistant populations of Varroa destructor in a vial test
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26910521
DOI
10.1007/s10493-016-0023-8
PII: 10.1007/s10493-016-0023-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Acaricide, Apiculture, Discriminating concentrations, Multiple-resistance, Varroa,
- MeSH
- Acaricides * MeSH
- Drug Combinations MeSH
- Tick Control * MeSH
- Nitriles * MeSH
- Polylysine analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Pyrethrins * MeSH
- Toluidines * MeSH
- Varroidae * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Names of Substances
- acrinathrin MeSH Browser
- Acaricides * MeSH
- amitraz MeSH Browser
- Drug Combinations MeSH
- fluvalinate MeSH Browser
- gemals MeSH Browser
- Nitriles * MeSH
- Polylysine MeSH
- Pyrethrins * MeSH
- Toluidines * MeSH
The parasitic mite Varroa destructor is a major pest of the western honeybee, Apis mellifera. The development of acaricide resistance in Varroa populations is a global issue. Discriminating concentrations of acaricides are widely used to detect pest resistance. Two methods, using either glass vials or paraffin capsules, are used to screen for Varroa resistance to various acaricides. We found the glass vial method to be useless for testing Varroa resistance to acaridices, so we developed a polypropylene vial bioassay. This method was tested on tau-fluvalinate-, acrinathrin-, and amitraz-resistant mite populations from three apiaries in Czechia. Acetone was used as a control and technical grade acaricide compounds diluted in acetone were applied to the polypropylene vials. The solutions were spread on the vial surface by rolling the vial, and were then evaporated. Freshly collected Varroa females were placed in the vials and the mortality of the exposed mites was measured after 24 h. The Varroa populations differed in mortality between the apiaries and the tested compounds. Mites from the Kyvalka site were resistant to acrinathrin, tau-fluvalinate, and amitraz, while mites from the Postrizin site were susceptible to all three acaricides. In Prelovice apiary, the mites were susceptible to acrinathrin and amitraz, but not to tau-fluvalinate. The calculated discriminating concentrations for tau-fluvalinate, acrinathrin, and amitraz were 0.66, 0.26 and 0.19 µg/mL, respectively. These results indicate that polyproplyne vial tests can be used to determine discriminating concentrations for the early detection of acaricide resistant Varroa. Finally, multiple-resistance in Kyvalka may indicate metabolic resistance.
See more in PubMed
J Insect Physiol. 2013 Apr;59(4):487-93 PubMed
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Jun;64(6):610-6 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2007 Sep 30;148(3-4):379-83 PubMed
BMC Genomics. 2010 Oct 25;11:602 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36285 PubMed
J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S96-119 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):16772-7 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Sep;119(3):640-54 PubMed
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Oct;103(5):1797-802 PubMed
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Jun;70(6):889-94 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 11;5:13907 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82941 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2011 Apr;108(4):815-21 PubMed
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Jun;97(3):741-7 PubMed
Exp Appl Acarol. 2009 Apr;47(4):317-20 PubMed
Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:99-117 PubMed