• This record comes from PubMed

Priority topics for European multidisciplinary guidelines on the management of chronic kidney disease in older adults

. 2016 Jun ; 48 (6) : 859-69. [epub] 20160317

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
MR/K006665/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom

Links

PubMed 26984833
DOI 10.1007/s11255-016-1257-4
PII: 10.1007/s11255-016-1257-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources

PURPOSE: To identify and prioritize potential topics to be addressed in the development of European multidisciplinary guidelines on the management of chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5 in older patients. METHODS: We composed a list of 47 potential guideline topics by reviewing the literature, consulting online 461 nephrologists and 107 geriatricians, and obtaining expert input. A multidisciplinary panel of twelve experts then prioritized the topics during a face-to-face consensus meeting, following a nominal group technique structure with two voting rounds. Topics were rated on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 ('not at all important') to 9 ('critically important'). RESULTS: The highest rating (median; range) was assigned to 'Screening and referral' (8.5; 2.0). Eight topics shared the second highest rating with a median priority score of 8.0 (2.0) and included 'Starting dialysis or not' and 'Accurate assessment of renal function.' 'Targets for and treatment of diabetes' received the lowest rating with (3.0; 6.0). CONCLUSIONS: This joint initiative of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) and the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) prioritized the development of guidance on interdisciplinary referral of older patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5. Future guidance will therefore focus on identifying prognostic scores to predict death and progression to end-stage renal disease, as well as accurate tests for assessment of renal function in older kidney patients. This will contribute to more informed treatment decision making in this growing patient population.

See more in PubMed

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Jul;30(7):1066-74 PubMed

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(4):219-28 PubMed

Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Dec;66(6):1024-32 PubMed

Kidney Int. 2015 Sep;88(3):447-59 PubMed

Croat Med J. 2010 Dec;51(6):483-92 PubMed

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Nov;18(11):2960-7 PubMed

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):783-90 PubMed

Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Jan;63(1 Suppl):A7 PubMed

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Dec;30(12 ):1951-8 PubMed

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 07;10(7):e0128228 PubMed

Acta Derm Venereol. 2015 Sep;95(7):816-21 PubMed

Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):717-24 PubMed

Kidney Int. 2015 Nov;88(5):1178-86 PubMed

Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jul;57(7):e263-9 PubMed

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):1813-21 PubMed

Implement Sci. 2012 Jul 04;7:60 PubMed

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):41-49 PubMed

Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88 PubMed

Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):860-9 PubMed

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;24(8):1297-304 PubMed

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;63(12):1308-11 PubMed

Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Nov;47(11):1809-16 PubMed

Palliat Med. 2009 Mar;23 (2):103-10 PubMed

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Dec;7(12):2002-9 PubMed

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):1737-45 PubMed

BMC Nephrol. 2013 Dec 02;14:265 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...