Integrity of the mRNA in clinical samples has major impact on the quality of measured expression levels. This is independent of the measurement technique being next generation sequencing (NGS), Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) or microarray profiling. If mRNA is highly degraded or damaged, measured data will be very unreliable and the whole study is likely a waste of time and money. It is therefore common strategy to test the quality of RNA in samples before conducting large and costly studies. Most methods today to assess the quality of RNA are ignorant to the nature of the RNA and, therefore, reflect the integrity of ribosomal RNA, which is the dominant species, rather than of mRNAs, microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, which usually are the species of interest. Here, we present a novel molecular approach to assess the quality of the targeted RNA species by measuring the differential amplification (ΔAmp) of an Endogenous RNase Resistant (ERR) marker relative to a reference gene, optionally combined with the measurement of two amplicons of different lengths. The combination reveals any mRNA degradation caused by ribonucleases as well as physical, chemical or UV damage. ΔAmp has superior sensitivity to common microfluidic electrophoretic methods, senses the integrity of the actual targeted RNA species, and allows for a smoother and more cost efficient workflow.

TATAA Biocenter AB Gothenburg Sweden

TATAA Biocenter AB Gothenburg Sweden; Laboratory of Gene Expression Institute of Biotechnology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Tichopad A., Kitchen R., Riedmaier I., Becker C., Stahlberg A., Kubista M. Design and optimization of reverse-transcription quantitative pcr experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009;55:101816–101823. PubMed

Pazzagli M., Malentacchi F., Simi L., Orlando C., Wyrich R., Günther K. SPIDIA-RNA: first external quality assessment for the pre-analytical phase of blood samples used for RNA based analyses. Methods. 2013;59:20–31. PubMed

Li Y., Breaker R.R. Kinetics of RNA degradation by specific base catalysis of transesterification involving the 2′-hydroxyl group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(23):5364–5372.

Larson D.E., Zahradka P., Sells B.H. Control points in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1991;69:5–22. PubMed

Schroeder A., Mueller O., Stocker S., Salowsky R., Leiber M., Gassmann M. The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol. Biol. 2006;7:3. PubMed PMC

Sidova M., Tomankova S., Abaffy P., Kubista M., Sindelka R. Effects of post-mortem and physical degradation on RNA integrity and quality. ​Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2015.08.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Rainen L., Oelmueller U., Jurgensen S., Wyrich R., Ballas C., Schram J. Stabilization of mRNA expression in whole blood samples. Clin. Chem. 2002;48(11):1883–1890. PubMed

Ibberson D., Benes V., Muckenthaler M., Castoldi M. RNA degradation compromises the reliability of microRNA expression profiling. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:102. PubMed PMC

Becker C., Hammerle-Fickinger C., Riedmaier I., Pfaffl M.W. mRNA and microRNA quality control for RT-qPCR analysis. Methods. 2010;50(4):237–243. PubMed

Nolan T., Hands R.E., Bustin S.A. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1(3):1559–1582. PubMed

Die J.V., Roman B. RNA quality assessment: a view from plant qPCR studies. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:6069–6077. PubMed

Ståhlberg A., Håkansson J., Xian X., Semb H., Kubista M. Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clin. Chem. 2004;50(3):509–515. PubMed

Viertler C., Groelz D., Gündisch S., Kashofer K., Reischauer B., Riegman P. A new technology for stabilization of biomolecules in tissues for combined histological and molecular analyses. J. Mol. Diagn. 2012;14(5):458–466. PubMed

Kubista M., Björkman J., Svec D., Sjöback S. RNA quality matters. Eur. Pharmaceut. Rev. 2012;17(6):63–67.

Kashofer K., Viertler C., Pichler M., Zatloukal K. Quality control of RNA preservation and extraction from paraffin-embedded tissue: implications for RT-PCR and microarray analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70714. PubMed PMC

J. Björkman, M. Kubista. Methods for assessing rna quality. Patent No. 13710858. 5-1404, 2015.

Kap M., Sieuwerts A.M., Kubista M., Oomen M., Arshad S., Riegman P. The influence of tissue procurement procedures on RNA integrity, gene expression, and morphology in porcine and human liver tissue. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2015;13(3):200–206. PubMed

CEN/TC 140 “In vitro diagnostic medical devices”.

The focus on sample quality: Influence of colon tissue collection on reliability of qPCR data