Recurrent Microdeletions at Xq27.3-Xq28 and Male Infertility: A Study in the Czech Population
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27257673
PubMed Central
PMC4892532
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0156102
PII: PONE-D-15-54914
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chromozomální delece * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lidské chromozomy X * MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- mužská infertilita genetika MeSH
- spermie patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Genetic causes of male infertility are hypothesized to involve multiple types of mutations, from single gene defects to complex chromosome rearrangements. Recently, several recurrent X-chromosome microdeletions (located in subtelomeric region of the long arm) were reported to be associated with male infertility in Spanish and Italian males. The aim of our study was to test their prevalence and infertility association in population of men from the Czech Republic. METHODS: 107 males with pathological sperm evaluation resulting in nonobstructive infertility were compared to 131 males with normal fecundity. X-chromosome microdeletions were assessed by +/- PCR with three primer pairs for each region Xcnv64 (Xq27.3), Xcnv67 (Xq28) and Xcnv69 (Xq28). The latter microdeletion was further characterized by amplification across the deleted region, dividing the deletion into three types; A, B and C. RESULTS: We detected presence of isolated Xcnv64 deletion in 3 patients and 14 controls, and Xcnv69 in 3 patients and 6 controls (1 and 1 patient vs.4 and 1 control for types A and B respectively). There was one control with combined Xcnv64 and Xcnv69 type B deletions, and one patient with combination of Xcnv64 and Xcnv69 type C deletions. The frequency of the deletions was thus not higher in patient compared to control group, Xcnv64 was marginally associated with controls (adjusted Fisher´s exact test P = 0.043), Xcnv69 was not associated (P = 0.452). We excluded presence of more extensive rearrangements in two subjects with combined Xcnv64 and Xcnv69 deletions. There was no Xcnv67 deletion in our cohort. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the two previously reported X-linked microdeletions (Xcnv64 and Xcnv69) do not seem to confer a significant risk to impaired spermatogenesis in the Czech population. The potential clinical role of the previously reported patient-specific Xcnv67 remains to be determined in a larger study population.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–12. Epub 2007/03/23. doi: dem046 [pii] 10.1093/humrep/dem046 . PubMed DOI
Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37 Epub 2015/05/01. 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1 [pii]. PubMed DOI PMC
Bablok L, Dziadecki W, Szymusik I, Wolczynski S, Kurzawa R, Pawelczyk L, et al. Patterns of infertility in Poland—multicenter study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32(6):799–804. Epub 2012/01/31. doi: NEL320611A01 [pii]. . PubMed
Krausz C, Chianese C. Genetic testing and counselling for male infertility. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(3):244–50. Epub 2014/04/18. 10.1097/MED.0000000000000058 . PubMed DOI
Hotaling J, Carrell DT. Clinical genetic testing for male factor infertility: current applications and future directions. Andrology. 2014;2(3):339–50. Epub 2014/04/09. 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00200.x . PubMed DOI
Vincent MC, Daudin M, De MP, Massat G, Mieusset R, Pontonnier F, et al. Cytogenetic investigations of infertile men with low sperm counts: a 25-year experience. J Androl. 2002;23(1):18–22; discussion 44–5. Epub 2002/01/10. . PubMed
Van Assche E, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, et al. Cytogenetics of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1996;11 Suppl 4:1–24; discussion 5–6. Epub 1996/12/01. . PubMed
Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(2):226–39. Epub 2001/04/11. 10.1210/edrv.22.2.0425 . PubMed DOI
Hotaling JM. Genetics of male infertility. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):1–17. Epub 2013/11/30. 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.009 S0094-0143(13)00086-4 [pii]. . PubMed DOI
O'Flynn O'Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):1–12. Epub 2010/01/28. doi: S0015-0282(09)03965-X [pii] 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.045 . PubMed DOI
Massart A, Lissens W, Tournaye H, Stouffs K. Genetic causes of spermatogenic failure. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):40–8. Epub 2011/12/06. 10.1038/aja.2011.67 aja201167 [pii]. PubMed DOI PMC
Coutton C, Escoffier J, Martinez G, Arnoult C, Ray PF. Teratozoospermia: spotlight on the main genetic actors in the human. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):455–85. Epub 2015/04/19. 10.1093/humupd/dmv020 dmv020 [pii]. . PubMed DOI
Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): facilitating mouse as a model for human biology and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D726–36. Epub 2014/10/29. 10.1093/nar/gku967 gku967 [pii]. PubMed DOI PMC
Lo Giacco D, Chianese C, Ars E, Ruiz-Castane E, Forti G, Krausz C. Recurrent X chromosome-linked deletions: discovery of new genetic factors in male infertility. J Med Genet. 2014;51(5):340–4. Epub 2014/01/15. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101988 jmedgenet-2013-101988 [pii]. . PubMed DOI
Choe JH, Seo JT. Title: Is Varicocelectomy useful for Subfertile Men with Isolated Teratozoospermia? Urology. 2015. Epub 2015/09/06. doi: S0090-4295(15)00814-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.014 . PubMed DOI
Gudeman SR, Townsend B, Fischer K, Walters RC, Crain D. Etiology of azoospermia in a military population. J Urol. 2015;193(4):1318–21. Epub 2014/12/03. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.048 S0022-5347(14)04668-0 [pii]. . PubMed DOI