Effectiveness of β-blockers in physically active patients with hypertension: protocol of a systematic review
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
27311904
PubMed Central
PMC4916615
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010534
PII: bmjopen-2015-010534
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- beta blockers, cardiovascular disease, physical activity,
- MeSH
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Hypertension therapy MeSH
- Drug Therapy, Combination MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Meta-Analysis as Topic MeSH
- Systematic Reviews as Topic MeSH
- Exercise Therapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Research Design MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Based on more than 5 decades of epidemiological studies, it is now widely accepted that higher physical activity patterns and levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with better health outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to consider how treatment methods affect these two components. Clinically, one very important question concerns the influence of aerobic performance on patients being treated for hypertension. The administration of β-blockers can significantly reduce maximal-and especially submaximal-aerobic exercise capacity. The objective of this review is to determine, by comparison of existing mono and combination therapy, which β-blockers are less physically limiting for patients with hypertension who are physically active. METHODS: A three-step strategy will be adopted in the review, following the methods used by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The initial search will be conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The second search will involve the listed databases for the published literature (MEDLINE, Biomedica Czechoslovaca, Tripdatabase, Pedro, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cinahl, WoS) and the unpublished literature (Open Grey, Current Controlled Trials, MedNar, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cos Conference Papers Index, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO). Following the JBI methodology, analysis of title/abstracts and full texts, critical appraisal and data extraction will be carried out on selected studies using the JBI tool, MAStARI. This will be performed by two independent reviewers. If possible, statistical meta-analysis will be pooled. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed. Subgroup analysis will be used for different age and gender characteristics. Funnel plots, Begg's rank correlation and Egger's regression test will be used to detect or correct publication bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethical assessment is not needed-we will search/evaluate the existing sources of literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015026914.
See more in PubMed
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al. . European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012;33:1635–701. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 PubMed DOI
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al. , Task Force Members. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013;31:1281–357. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc PubMed DOI
Hackam DG, Khan NA, Hemmelgarn BR et al. . The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 2—therapy. Can J Cardiol 2010;26:249–58. 10.1016/S0828-282X(10)70379-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Ogedegbe G, Gyamfi J, Plange-Rhule J et al. . Task shifting interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005983 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005983 PubMed DOI PMC
Larochelle P, Tobe SW, Lacourcière Y. β-Blockers in hypertension: studies and meta-analyses over the years. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:S16–22. 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.012 PubMed DOI
Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H et al. . Efficacy of β blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2014;384:2235–43. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61373-8 PubMed DOI
Jackson JL, Cogbill E, Santana-Davila R et al. . A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of drugs for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0130733 10.1371/journal.pone.0130733 PubMed DOI PMC
Yun S, Vincelette ND, Abraham I. Cardioprotective role of β-blockers and angiotensin antagonists in early-onset anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 2015;91:627–33. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133535 PubMed DOI
Peller M, Ozierański K, Balsam P et al. . Influence of beta-blockers on endothelial function: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiol J 2015;22:708–16. 10.5603/CJ.a2015.0042 PubMed DOI
Myers J, McAuley P, Lavie CJ et al. . Physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as major markers of cardiovascular risk: their independent and interwoven importance to health status. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57:306–14. 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.011 PubMed DOI
Van Baak MA. Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and exercise. An update. Sports Med 1988;5:209–25. 10.2165/00007256-198805040-00002 PubMed DOI
Lauer MS, Francis GS, Okin PM et al. . Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality. JAMA 1999;281:524–9. 10.1001/jama.281.6.524 PubMed DOI
Lamont LS, Brown T, Riebe D et al. . The major components of human energy balance during chronic beta-adrenergic blockade. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2000;20:247–50. 10.1097/00008483-200007000-00006 PubMed DOI
Kuyper LM, Khan NA. Atenolol vs nonatenolol β-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:S47–53. 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.01.006 PubMed DOI
Billeh R, Hirsh D, Barker C et al. . Randomized, double-blind comparison of acute beta1-blockade with 50 mg metoprolol tartrate vs 25 mg carvedilol in normal subjects. Congest Heart Fail 2006;12:254–7. 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2006.05496.x PubMed DOI
Koshucharova G, Klein W, Lercher P et al. . Different beta-blocking effects of carvedilol and bisoprolol in humans. J Clin Basic Cardiol 2001;4:53–6.
Herman RB, Jesudason PJ, Mustafa AM et al. . Differential effects of carvedilol and atenolol on plasma noradrenaline during exercise in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;55:134–8. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01755.x PubMed DOI PMC
Howlett JG. Nebivolol: vasodilator properties and evidence for relevance in treatment of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:S29–37. 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.003 PubMed DOI
Van Bortel LM, van Baak MA. Exercise tolerance with nebivolol and atenolol. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1992;6:239–47. 10.1007/BF00051145 PubMed DOI
Metra M, Giubbini R, Nodari S et al. . Differential effects of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the long-term effects of metoprolol versus carvedilol. Circulation 2000;102:546–51. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.5.546 PubMed DOI
Marazzi G, Volterrani M, Caminiti G et al. . Comparative long term effects of nebivolol and carvedilol in hypertensive heart failure patients. J Card Fail 2011;17:703–9. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.001 PubMed DOI
Nodari S, Metra M, Dei Cas L. Beta-Blocker treatment of patients with diastolic heart failure and arterial hypertension. A prospective, randomized, comparison of the long-term effects of atenolol vs. nebivolol. Eur J Heart Fail 2003;5:621–7. PubMed
Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P et al. . Exercise standards for testing and training a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;128:873–934. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829b5b44 PubMed DOI
Laboratories ACoPSfCPF. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 PubMed DOI
McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 PubMed DOI PMC
The JBI. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual 2014. University of Adelaide, 2014.
Munn Z, Porritt K, Aromataris E et al. . Summary of findings tables for Joanna Briggs Institute systematic reviews. Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014.