Current Status of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
27378038
DOI
10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.002
PII: S0025-6196(16)30206-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Comorbidity MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Heart-Assist Devices adverse effects standards MeSH
- Heart Failure physiopathology surgery therapy MeSH
- Heart Transplantation standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Thrombosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Tissue and Organ Procurement statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Congestive heart failure (HF) remains a serious burden in the Western World. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy and resynchronization, many patients have progression to end-stage HF. These patients may be candidates for heart transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Heart transplants are limited by organ shortages and in some cases by patient comorbidities; therefore, LVAD therapy is emerging as a strategy of bridge to transplant or as a destination therapy in patients ineligible for transplant. Patients initially ineligible for a transplant may, in certain cases, become eligible for transplant after physiologic improvement with LVAD therapy, and a small number of patients with an LVAD may have sufficient recovery of myocardial function to allow device explantation. This clinically oriented review will describe (1) the most frequently used pump types and aspects of the continuous-flow physiology and (2) the clinical indications for and the shift toward the use of LVADs in less sick patients with HF. Additionally, we review complications of LVAD therapy and project future directions in this field. We referred to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support, landmark trials, and results from recently published studies as major sources in obtaining recent outcomes, and we searched for related published literature via PubMed. This review focuses primarily on clinical practice for primary care physicians and non-HF cardiologists in the United States.
References provided by Crossref.org