BACKGROUND: Employment disparities are known to exist between lean and corpulent people, for example, corpulent people are less likely to be hired and get lower wages. The reasons for these disparities between weight groups are not completely understood. We hypothesize (i) that economic decision making differs between lean and corpulent subjects, (ii) that these differences are influenced by peoples' blood glucose concentrations and (iii) by the body weight of their opponents. METHODS: A total of 20 lean and 20 corpulent men were examined, who performed a large set of economic games (ultimatum game, trust game and risk game) under euglycemic and hypoglycemic conditions induced by the glucose clamp technique. RESULTS: In the ultimatum game, lean men made less fair decisions and offered 16% less money than corpulent men during euglycemia (P=0.042). During hypoglycemia, study participants of both weight groups accepted smaller amounts of money than during euglycemia (P=0.031), indicating that a lack of energy makes subjects to behave more like a Homo Economicus. In the trust game, lean men allocated twice as much money to lean than to corpulent trustees during hypoglycemia (P<0.001). Risk-seeking behavior did not differ between lean and corpulent men. CONCLUSION: Our data show that economic decision making is affected by both, the body weight of the participants and the body weight of their opponents, and that blood glucose concentrations should be taken into consideration when analyzing economic decision making. When relating these results to the working environment, the weight bias in economic decision making may be also relevant for employment disparities.

CERGE Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Economics Institute for Management Research Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy Friedrich Schiller University Jena University Hospital Jena Germany

Max Planck Institute of Economics Jena Germany

Medical Clinic 1 University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany

See more in PubMed

PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46924 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):183-8 PubMed

J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):98-105 PubMed

Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jan;36(1):226-37 PubMed

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 07;11(1):e0146358 PubMed

J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Mar;109(3):438-44 PubMed

Int J Obes. 1990 Jun;14(6):527-35 PubMed

Brain Behav. 2012 Jul;2(4):415-23 PubMed

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Nov;11(4):303-27 PubMed

J Sleep Res. 2010 Mar;19(1 Pt 1):54-63 PubMed

Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):743-55 PubMed

J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 May;119(2):440-6 PubMed

PLoS One. 2015 May 07;10(5):e0125806 PubMed

PLoS One. 2010 Jun 16;5(6):e11090 PubMed

Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:149-55 PubMed

Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 15;156:79-93 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76671 PubMed

Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):909-10 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2498-504 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15569-74 PubMed

Econ Hum Biol. 2007 Mar;5(1):1-19 PubMed

Front Neuroenergetics. 2012 Mar 08;4:4 PubMed

Psychosom Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;59(1):24-31 PubMed

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 May;17(5):941-64 PubMed

Psychol Bull. 2016 May;142(5):546-67 PubMed

Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 20;8:402 PubMed

Int J Eat Disord. 1998 Mar;23(2):153-9 PubMed

Obes Res. 2002 May;10(5):345-50 PubMed

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26008 PubMed

Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2007;17:187-217 PubMed

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Sep;14(9):1637-46 PubMed

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39143 PubMed

Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):876-81 PubMed

Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 27;2:173 PubMed

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Apr;28(2):143-80 PubMed