Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: audiological results

. 2017 Jan ; 274 (1) : 133-141. [epub] 20160816

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27530119
Odkazy

PubMed 27530119
DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4261-5
PII: 10.1007/s00405-016-4261-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Skull base tumors and, in particular, vestibular schwannoma (VS) are among the etiological reasons for single-sided deafness (SSD). Patients with SSD have problems in understanding speech in a noisy environment and cannot localize the direction of sounds. For the majority, this is the handicap for which they try to find a solution. Apart from CROS hearing aids, Baha is one of the most frequently used systems for SSD compensation. 38 patients with single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid removal of a vestibular schwannoma underwent testing with a Baha softband from September 2010 to August 2014. Sixteen patients (42 %) finally decided to accept Baha implantation. Subjective experience with the Baha softband was evaluated by patients using the BBSS questionnaire immediately after testing. Objective evaluation of the effect was performed as a measurement of the sentence discrimination score in noise and side horizontal discrimination without a Baha and 6 weeks and 12 months after a sound processor fitting. There was a significant improvement in sentence discrimination in the 6 week (64.0 %) and 1 year (74.6 %) interval of follow-up in comparison with understanding without Baha (24.0 %, p = 0.001) in situations when sentences are coming from the side of the non-hearing ear and noise contralaterally with SNR -5 dB. Baha can significantly improve sentence discrimination in complex-listening situation in patients with SSD after the VS surgery.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Laryngoscope. 2009 Apr;119(4):713-20 PubMed

J Speech Hear Disord. 1967 Nov;32(4):336-43 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2006 Sep;27(6):809-14 PubMed

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;142(4):554-9 PubMed

Am J Otol. 1981 Apr;2(4):304-10 PubMed

Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2001;122(5):343-50 PubMed

Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):511-8 PubMed

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;79(12):2050-5 PubMed

J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Dec;108(12):1031-5 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):826-33 PubMed

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Sep;137(3):522-3 PubMed

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:92-102 PubMed

Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1):40-5 PubMed

Cesk Neurol Neurochir. 1983 Sep;46(5):287-92 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jun;31(4):615-23 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1123-31 PubMed

Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;25(3):499-520 PubMed

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Jun;132(6):928-32 PubMed

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:315952 PubMed

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Oct;72(10):1455-9 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):999-1006 PubMed

Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan;123(2):258-60 PubMed

J Speech Hear Disord. 1965 May;30:121-38 PubMed

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2005 Dec;195:2-12 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2006 Feb;27(2):172-82 PubMed

Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1983;400:1-62 PubMed

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Sep;129(3):248-54 PubMed

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1285-91 PubMed

Prague Med Rep. 2009;110(1):60-6 PubMed

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:103-11 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jan;24(1):73-8 PubMed

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;79(10):1667-72 PubMed

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:124-31 PubMed

Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):39-47 PubMed

Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Aug;35(4):284-90 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...