Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin: A phase III randomized controlled trial
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
27542322
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.050
PII: S0168-8278(16)30429-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Hepatitis, Randomized, Therapy,
- MeSH
- Antiviral Agents MeSH
- Benzofurans MeSH
- Quinoxalines MeSH
- Hepatitis C, Chronic * MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Hepacivirus MeSH
- Imidazoles MeSH
- Interferons MeSH
- Drug Therapy, Combination MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ribavirin MeSH
- RNA, Viral MeSH
- Sofosbuvir MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antiviral Agents MeSH
- Benzofurans MeSH
- Quinoxalines MeSH
- Imidazoles MeSH
- Interferons MeSH
- Ribavirin MeSH
- RNA, Viral MeSH
- Sofosbuvir MeSH
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Direct-acting antiviral agents have improved treatment outcomes for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; however, head-to-head comparisons are limited. The C-EDGE Head-2-Head Study compared the safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) with sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SOF/PR) in patients with HCV infection. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Two hundred fifty-seven patients with HCV genotype (GT)1 or 4 infection and baseline viral load >10,000IU/ml were randomized to receive 12weeks of EBR/GZR 50mg/100mg once daily (n=129) or sofosbuvir (400mg once daily) plus PR (n=128). Primary efficacy objective was sustained virologic response 12weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12, HCV RNA <15IU/ml). The primary safety objective was the proportion of patients experiencing a tier 1 safety event. RESULTS: The majority of patients were non-cirrhotic (83.1%), treatment-naïve (74.9%) and had HCV GT1b infection (82.0%). SVR12 rates were 99.2% (128/129) and 90.5% (114/126) in the EBR/GZR and SOF/PR groups, respectively. The estimated adjusted difference in SVR12 was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-15.3%). Because the lower bound of the 1-sided 1-sample exact test was greater than -10% and greater than zero, both non-inferiority and superiority of EBR/GZR vs. SOF/PR were established. The frequency of tier 1 safety events was lower among patients receiving EBR/GZR than SOF/PR (0.8% vs. 27.8%, between group difference, 27.0% [95% CI, -35.5% to -19.6%; p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: EBR/GZR has a superior efficacy and safety profile in patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection compared with SOF/PR. LAY SUMMARY: The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12weeks was highly effective in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotypes 1 or 4 infection. This regimen was more effective than sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin for 12weeks, and was notably superior in patients regarded as difficult to treat, including those with previous treatment failure, cirrhosis, or a high baseline viral load. The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir also demonstrated a superior safety and tolerability profile based on fewer serious adverse events, no serious drug-related adverse events, and no treatment discontinuations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT02358044.
Budai Hepatólogiai Centrum Budapest Hungary
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Medical University of Bialystok Bialystok Poland
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty Ankara Turkey
Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
Hospital Universitario Donostia Gipuzkoa Spain
Institut Klinické a Experimentální Medicíny Prague Czech Republic
Klinik for Infektionsmedicin Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Denmark
Merck and Co Inc Kenilworth NJ United States
Semmelweis Egyetem Budapest Hungary
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02358044