Variations in very preterm birth rates in 30 high-income countries: are valid international comparisons possible using routine data?

. 2017 Apr ; 124 (5) : 785-794. [epub] 20160910

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27613083

Grantová podpora
CDF-2013-06-018 Department of Health - United Kingdom
K01 HD074726 NICHD NIH HHS - United States
T32 HD052460 NICHD NIH HHS - United States

OBJECTIVE: Concerns about differences in registration practices across countries have limited the use of routine data for international very preterm birth (VPT) rate comparisons. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Twenty-seven European countries, the United States, Canada and Japan in 2010. POPULATION: A total of 9 376 252 singleton births. METHOD: We requested aggregated gestational age data on live births, stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy (TOP) before 32 weeks of gestation, and information on registration practices for these births. We compared VPT rates and assessed the impact of births at 22-23 weeks of gestation, and different criteria for inclusion of stillbirths and TOP on country rates and rankings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Singleton very preterm birth rate, defined as singleton stillbirths and live births before 32 completed weeks of gestation per 1000 total births, excluding TOP if identifiable in the data source. RESULTS: Rates varied from 5.7 to 15.7 per 1000 total births and 4.0 to 11.9 per 1000 live births. Country registration practices were related to percentage of births at 22-23 weeks of gestation (between 1% and 23% of very preterm births) and stillbirths (between 6% and 40% of very preterm births). After excluding births at 22-23 weeks, rate variations remained high and with a few exceptions, country rankings were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: International comparisons of very preterm birth rates using routine data should exclude births at 22-23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy. The persistent large rate variations after these exclusions warrant continued surveillance of VPT rates at 24 weeks and over in high-income countries. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: International comparisons of VPT rates should exclude births at 22-23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy.

Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia Riga Latvia

Department Child Health TNO The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research Leiden The Netherlands

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics National Research Institute of Mother and Child Warsaw Poland

Department of Epidemiology Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA USA

Department of Lifecourse Epidemiology Department of Social Medicine National Centre for Child Health and Development Setagayaku Tokyo Japan

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore Medical Center Bronx NY USA

Department Public Health Faculty of Medical Sciences Anton de Kom University of Suriname Paramaribo Suriname

Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Occupational Health McGill University Faculty of Medicine Montreal QC Canada

Estonian Institute for Population Studies Tallinn University Tallinn Estonia

Inserm UMR 1153 Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité DHU Risks in Pregnancy Paris Descartes University Paris France

Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic

Karolinska Institute Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society Division of Family Medicine Stockholm Sweden

Surveillance and Epidemiology Division Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention Public Health Agency of Canada Ottawa ON Canada

The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies Group Department of Health Sciences College of Medicine Biological Sciences and Psychology University of Leicester Leicester UK

THL National Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

The health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. Euro-Peristat project with SCPE and EUROCAT, European Perinatal Health Report. 2013 May

Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)604967. PubMed DOI

Larroque B, Ancel PY, Marret S, Marchand L, Andre M, Arnaud C, et al. Lancet. 9615. Vol. 371. 20; 2008. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study; p. 813. PubMed DOI

Zeitlin J, Draper ES, Kollee L, Milligan D, Boerch K, Agostino R, et al. Differences in rates and short-term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in Europe in 2003: results from the MOSAIC cohort. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):e936–44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1620. PubMed DOI

Ancel PY, Goffinet F, Group E-W, Kuhn P, Langer B, Matis J, et al. Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. JAMA pediatrics. 2015;169(3):230–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351. PubMed DOI

Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):261–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1. PubMed DOI

Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, Spong CY, Howson CP, Cairns-Smith S, et al. Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2013;381(9862):223–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X. PubMed DOI PMC

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4. PubMed DOI

Zeitlin J, Szamotulska K, Drewniak N, Mohangoo AD, Chalmers J, Sakkeus L, et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2013;120(11):1356–65. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12281. PubMed DOI PMC

Mohangoo AD, Buitendijk SE, Szamotulska K, Chalmers J, Irgens LM, Bolumar F, et al. Gestational age patterns of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe: results from the Euro-Peristat project. PloS one. 2011;6(11):e24727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024727. PubMed DOI PMC

Kramer MS, Platt RW, Yang H, Haglund B, Cnattingius S, Bergsjo P. Registration artifacts in international comparisons of infant mortality. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2002;16(1):16–22. PubMed

Duryea EL, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The rate of preterm birth in the United States is affected by the method of gestational age assignment. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;213(2):231.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.038. PubMed DOI

Graafmans WC, Richardus JH, Macfarlane A, Rebagliato M, Blondel B, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. Comparability of published perinatal mortality rates in Western Europe: the quantitative impact of differences in gestational age and birthweight criteria. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2001;108(12):1237–45. PubMed

Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, Gissler M, Velebil P, Macfarlane A, Zeitlin J, et al. International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries: should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age? PloS one. 2013;8(5):e64869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064869. PubMed DOI PMC

Gissler M, Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, Chalmers J, Macfarlane A, Gaizauskiene A, et al. Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project. Informatics for health & social care. 2010;35(2):64–79. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2010.492923. PubMed DOI

Smith L, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Pritchard C, Field DJ. Comparing regional infant death rates: the influence of preterm births <24 weeks of gestation. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2013;98(2):103–7. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301359. PubMed DOI PMC

Organization WH. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - Instruction Manual. 2010;2

Schmitt SK, Sneed L, Phibbs CS. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):154–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0484. PubMed DOI PMC

Mangham LJ, Petrou S, Doyle LW, Draper ES, Marlow N. The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e312–27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1827. PubMed DOI

Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, Alexander S, Barros H, Blondel B, et al. Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2003;111(Suppl 1):S5–S14. PubMed

Heino A, Gissler M, Hindori-Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, Klungsoyr K, Verdenik I, et al. Variations in Multiple Birth Rates and Impact on Perinatal Outcomes in Europe. PloS one. 2016;11(3):e0149252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149252. PubMed DOI PMC

Wier ML, Pearl M, Kharrazi M. Gestational age estimation on United States livebirth certificates: a historical overview. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2007;21(Suppl 2):4–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00856.x. PubMed DOI

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Division of Vital Statistics. User Guide to the 2010 Natality Public Use File. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/Vitalstatsonline.htm.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Division of Vital Statistics. User Guide to the 2010 Fetal Death File. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/Vitalstatsonline.htm.

Blondel B, Morin I, Platt RW, Kramer MS, Usher R, Breart G. Algorithms for combining menstrual and ultrasound estimates of gestational age: consequences for rates of preterm and postterm birth. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2002;109(6):718–20. PubMed

Callaghan WM, Dietz PM. Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American journal of epidemiology. 2010;171(7):826–36. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp468. PubMed DOI

Pignotti MS, Donzelli G. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: an international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):e193–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0513. PubMed DOI

Macfarlane PI, Wood S, Bennett J. Non-viable delivery at 20-23 weeks gestation: observations and signs of life after birth. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2003;88(3):F199–202. PubMed PMC

McElrath TF, Norwitz ER, Nour N, Robinson JN. Contemporary trends in the management of delivery at 23 weeks’ gestation. American journal of perinatology. 2002;19(1):9–15. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20176. PubMed DOI

Garne E, Khoshnood B, Loane M, Boyd P, Dolk H, Group EW. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly after 23 weeks of gestation: a European register-based study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2010;117(6):660–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02531.x. PubMed DOI

van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Graafmans W, Biermans MC, Richardus JH, Zijlstra AG, Reefhuis J, et al. The influence of prenatal screening and termination of pregnancy on perinatal mortality rates. Prenatal diagnosis. 2002;22(11):966–72. doi: 10.1002/pd.442. PubMed DOI

Papiernik E, Zeitlin J, Delmas D, Draper ES, Gadzinowski J, Kunzel W, et al. Termination of pregnancy among very preterm births and its impact on very preterm mortality: results from ten European population-based cohorts in the MOSAIC study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2008;115(3):361–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01611.x. PubMed DOI

Draper ES, Alfirevic Z, Stacey F, Hennessy E, Costeloe K, Group EPS. An investigation into the reporting and management of late terminations of pregnancy (between 22 +0 and 26 +6 weeks of gestation) within NHS Hospitals in England in 2006: the EPICure preterm cohort study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2012;119(6):710–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03285.x. PubMed DOI

MacDorman MF, Matthews TJ, Mohangoo AD, Zeitlin J. International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2014;63(5):1–6. PubMed

Deb-Rinker P, Leon JA, Gilbert NL, Rouleau J, Andersen AM, Bjarnadottir RI, et al. Differences in perinatal and infant mortality in high-income countries: artifacts of birth registration or evidence of true differences? BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0430-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1996;87(2):163–8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. PubMed DOI

Delnord M, Blondel B, Zeitlin J. What contributes to disparities in the preterm birth rate in European countries? Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. 2015;27(2):133–42. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000156. PubMed DOI PMC

Garn JV, Nagulesapillai T, Metcalfe A, Tough S, Kramer MR. International comparison of common risk factors of preterm birth between the U.S. and Canada, using PRAMS and MES (2005-2006) Maternal and child health journal. 2015;19(4):811–8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1576-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Ananth CV. Characteristics of Childbearing Women, Obstetrical Interventions and Preterm Delivery: A Comparison of the US and France. Matern Child Health J. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1602. PubMed DOI

Papiernik E, Zeitlin J, Delmas D, Blondel B, Kunzel W, Cuttini M, et al. Differences in outcome between twins and singletons born very preterm: results from a population-based European cohort. Human reproduction. 2010;25(4):1035–43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep430. PubMed DOI

Field D, Bajuk B, Manktelow BN, Vincent T, Dorling J, Tarnow-Mordi W, et al. Geographically based investigation of the influence of very-preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the UK and Australia. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2008;93(3):F212–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.119271. PubMed DOI

Field D, Draper ES, Fenton A, Papiernik E, Zeitlin J, Blondel B, et al. Rates of very preterm birth in Europe and neonatal mortality rates. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2009;94(4):F253–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.150433. PubMed DOI

Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):164–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60108-7. PubMed DOI

Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington (DC): 2007. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. PubMed

Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, Setel PW, de Savigny D, Lozano R, et al. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet. 2015 doi: 10.1016/S0140-67361560171-4. PubMed DOI

Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, Lopez AD, Mikkelsen L, de Savigny D, Lozano R, et al. Are well functioning civil registration and vital statistics systems associated with better health outcomes? Lancet. 2015 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60172-6. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...