Drivers of U.S. toxicological footprints trajectory 1998-2013
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28000739
PubMed Central
PMC5175177
DOI
10.1038/srep39514
PII: srep39514
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ekonomické modely MeSH
- hornictví MeSH
- klimatické změny MeSH
- látky znečišťující vzduch chemie MeSH
- látky znečišťující životní prostředí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- nakládání s odpady metody MeSH
- olovo MeSH
- populační růst MeSH
- skleníkový efekt * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
- Názvy látek
- látky znečišťující vzduch MeSH
- látky znečišťující životní prostředí MeSH
- olovo MeSH
By exploiting data from the Toxic Release Inventory of the United States, we have established that the toxicological footprint (TF) increased by 3.3% (88.4 Mt) between 1998 and 1999 and decreased by 39% (1088.5 Mt) between 1999 and 2013. From 1999 to 2006, the decreasing TF was driven by improvements in emissions intensity (i.e. gains in production efficiency) through toxic chemical management options: cleaner production; end of pipe treatment; transfer for further waste management; and production scale. In particular, the mining sector reduced its TF through outsourcing processes. Between 2006 and 2009, decreasing TF was due to decrease in consumption volume triggered by economic recession. Since 2009, the economic recovery increased TF, overwhelming the influence of improved emissions intensity through population growth, consumption and production structures. Accordingly, attaining a less-toxic economy and environment will be influenced by a combination of gains in production efficiency through improvement in emissions mitigation technologies and changes in consumption patterns. Overall, the current analysis highlights the structural dynamics of toxic chemical release and would inform future formulation of effective mitigation standards and management protocols towards the detoxification of the environment.
Advanced Resource Efficiency Centre The University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 1FL UK
Centre for Energy Environment and Sustainability The University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 1FL UK
Centre for Health and Social Care Research Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield S10 2BP UK
Department of Environmental Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland 20742 USA
Departments of Materials Science and Engineering The University of Sheffield Sheffield S1 3JD UK
Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences Nagasaki University 1 14 Bunkyo machi Japan
Kent Business School University of Kent Canterbury CT2 7PE UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Egan P. J. & Mullin M. Recent improvement and projected worsening of weather in the United States. Nature 532, 357–360 (2016). PubMed
Field C. B., Barros V. R., Mach K. & Mastrandrea M. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press Cambridge, New York, NY, 2014).
Lemoine D. & Traeger C. P. Economics of tipping the climate dominoes. Nature Climate Change (2016).
Allen M. R. Drivers of peak warming in a consumption-maximizing world. Nature Climate Change (2016).
Zhu Z. et al.. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nature Climate Change (2016).
Kaiser J. Hazards of particles, PCBs focus of Philadelphia meeting. Science 288, 424–425 (2000). PubMed
He T. et al.. Ambient air pollution and years of life lost in Ningbo, China. Scientific reports 6 (2016). PubMed PMC
Stahl R. G. et al.. The influence of global climate change on the scientific foundations and applications of environmental toxicology and chemistry: introduction to a SETAC international workshop. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32, 13–19 (2013). PubMed PMC
Shea K., Corra L., Pronczuk J. & Brune M. N. In Managing chemicals in a changing climate to protect health (IFCS, 2008).
Feng K., Davis S. J., Sun L. & Hubacek K. Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013. Nature communications 6 (2015). PubMed PMC
Guan D., Hubacek K., Weber C. L., Peters G. P. & Reiner D. M. The drivers of Chinese CO 2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Global Environmental Change 18, 626–634 (2008).
Davis S. J. & Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 5687–5692, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906974107 (2010). PubMed DOI PMC
Barrett J. et al.. Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study. Climate Policy 13, 451–470 (2013).
Lave L. B. Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges. Environmental Science & Technology 29, 420A–426A (1995).
Ranson M., Cox B., Keenan C. & Teitelbaum D. The Impact of Pollution Prevention on Toxic Environmental Releases from US Manufacturing Facilities. Environmental science & technology 49, 12951–12957 (2015). PubMed
The Mining Association of Canada. 100 innovations in the mining industry. (Canada, 2012).
Ibn-Mohammed T. et al.. Integrated hybrid life cycle assessment and supply chain environmental profile evaluations of lead-based (lead zirconate titanate) versus lead-free (potassium sodium niobate) piezoelectric ceramics. Energy & Environmental Science 9, 3495–3520 (2016).
Diamond J. Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. (Penguin, 2005).
Kahn M. E. The geography of US pollution intensive trade: evidence from 1958 to 1994. Regional science and urban Economics 33, 383–400 (2003).
U.S. International Trade Commission. Dataweb U.S. Import and Export, https://www.usitc.gov/ (Date of access:10/05/2016) (2016).
U.N. Comtrade Database. International Trade in Goods based on UN Comtrade data, http://comtrade.un.org/ (Date of access:10/05/2016) (2015).
United State Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory Information by Sector-Mining (except Oil and Gas) Sector (NAICS 212), https://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan/what-epa-doing (Date of access:11/05/2016) (2012).
United State Environmental Protection Agency. Criminal Provisions of the Clean Air Act, https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/criminal-provisions-clean-air-act (Date of access:11/05/2016) (2012).
.Fotta B. & Bockosh G. The aging workforce: an emerging issue in the mining industry. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Institute of Mining Health, Safety and Research. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Mining and Minerals Engineering. 33–45 (2000).
.Psomopoulos C., Bourka A. & Themelis N. J. Waste-to-energy: A review of the status and benefits in USA. Waste Management 29, 1718–1724 (2009). PubMed
Damgaard A., Riber C., Fruergaard T., Hulgaard T. & Christensen T. H. Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. Waste Management 30, 1244–1250 (2010). PubMed
Fujii H. & Managi S. Decomposition of toxic chemical substance management in three US manufacturing sectors from 1991 to 2008. Journal of Industrial Ecology 17, 461–471 (2013).
U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2011, http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/2011/mcs2011.pdf (Date of access:11/05/2016) (2011).
Peters G. P., Weber C. L., Guan D. & Hubacek K. China’s growing CO2 emissions a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 5939–5944 (2007). PubMed
Bui L. T. & Kapon S. The impact of voluntary programs on polluting behavior: Evidence from pollution prevention programs and toxic releases. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64, 31–44 (2012).
Ten Raa T. The extraction of technical coefficients from input and output data. Economic Systems Research 19, 453–459 (2007).
Ibn-Mohammed T., Greenough R., Taylor S., Ozawa-Meida L. & Acquaye A. Integrating economic considerations with operational and embodied emissions into a decision support system for the optimal ranking of building retrofit options. Building and Environment 72, 82–101 (2014).
Miller R. E. & Blair P. D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Feng K., Siu Y. L., Guan D. & Hubacek K. Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16, 600–611, doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00494.x (2012). DOI
Timmer M. et al.. The world input-output database (WIOD): contents, sources and methods. WIOD Background document available at www.wiod.org 40 (2012).
Lenzen M., Moran D., Kanemoto K. & Geschke A. Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research 25, 20–49 (2013).
Wood R. Structural decomposition analysis of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 37, 4943–4948, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.060 (2009). DOI
Rormose P. & Olsen T. In 15th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques (International Input-output Association, Beijing, China, 2005).
Wier M. Sources of Changes in Emissions from Energy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis. Economic Systems Research 10, 99–112, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535319808565469 (1998). DOI
Mukhopadhyay K. & Chakraborty D. India’s Energy Consumption Changes during 1973/74 to 1991/92. Economic Systems Research 11, 423–438 (1999).
Lim H.-J., Yoo S.-H. & Kwak S.-J. Industrial CO2 emissions from energy use in Korea: A structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 37, 686–698 (2009).
Wu L., Kaneko S. & Matsuoka S. Driving forces behind the stagnancy of China’s energy-related CO2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: the relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change. Energy Policy 33, 319–335, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.003 (2005). DOI
Casler S. D. & Rose A. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy. Environ Resource Econ 11, 349–363 (1998).
Guan D., Hubacek K., Weber C. L., Peters G. P. & Reiner D. M. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Global Environmental Change 18, 626–634 (2008).
Guan D., Peters G. P., Weber C. L. & Hubacek K. Journey to world top emitter: An analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge. Geophysical Research Letters 36, 1–5 (2009).
Peters G. P., Weber C. L., Guan D. & Hubacek K. China’s Growing CO2 Emissions: A Race between Increasing Consumption and Efficiency Gains. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 5939–5944, doi: 10.1021/es070108f (2007). PubMed DOI
Dietzenbacher E. & Los B. Structural decomposition techniques: Sense and sensitivity. Economic Systems Research 10, 307–323 (1998).
Seibel S. Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emission Changes in Germany - Conceptual Framework and Empirical Results. (European Commission, Working papers and studies, 2003).
United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. Input-Output Accounts Data, http://www.bea.gov/industry/io_annual.htm (Date of access:10/05/2016) (2014).
.Ang B. W. & Zhang F. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25, 1149–1176 (2000).
Boyd G. A. & Roop J. M. A note on the Fisher ideal index decomposition for structural change in energy intensity. The Energy Journal, 87–101 (2004).
Choi K.-H. & Ang B. Attribution of changes in Divisia real energy intensity index—An extension to index decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 34, 171–176 (2012).
Su B. & Ang B. Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Economics 34, 177–188 (2012).
U.S. Geological Survey. Energy and Minerals, http://www.usgs.gov/ (Date of access:11/05/2016) (2015).