Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin For Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer: An International Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial (INTERTECC-2)
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Grant support
KL2 RR031978
NCRR NIH HHS - United States
UL1 TR000100
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
L30 CA135746
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
28126303
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.027
PII: S0360-3016(16)33485-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adenocarcinoma diagnostic imaging pathology therapy MeSH
- Brachytherapy methods MeSH
- Radiotherapy Dosage MeSH
- Chemoradiotherapy methods MeSH
- Cisplatin therapeutic use MeSH
- Gastrointestinal Tract radiation effects MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Bone Marrow * MeSH
- Organ Sparing Treatments methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnostic imaging pathology therapy MeSH
- Neutropenia epidemiology prevention & control MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Radiation-Sensitizing Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Radiotherapy, Image-Guided methods MeSH
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell diagnostic imaging pathology therapy MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cisplatin MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
- Radiation-Sensitizing Agents MeSH
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces acute hematologic and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for patients with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled patients with stage IB-IVA cervical carcinoma in a single-arm phase II trial involving 8 centers internationally. All patients received weekly cisplatin concurrently with once-daily IMRT, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy, as indicated. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of either acute grade ≥3 neutropenia or clinically significant GI toxicity within 30 days of completing chemoradiation therapy. A preplanned subgroup analysis tested the hypothesis that positron emission tomography-based image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) would lower the risk of acute neutropenia. We also longitudinally assessed patients' changes in quality of life. RESULTS: From October 2011 to April 2015, 83 patients met the eligibility criteria and initiated protocol therapy. The median follow-up was 26.0 months. The incidence of any primary event was 26.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.2%-36.9%), significantly lower than the 40% incidence hypothesized a priori from historical data (P=.012). The incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia and clinically significant GI toxicity was 19.3% (95% CI 12.2%-29.0%) and 12.0% (95% CI 6.7%-20.8%), respectively. Compared with patients treated without IG-IMRT (n=48), those treated with IG-IMRT (n=35) had a significantly lower incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia (8.6% vs 27.1%; 2-sided χ2P=.035) and nonsignificantly lower incidence of grade ≥3 leukopenia (25.7% vs 41.7%; P=.13) and any grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (31.4% vs 43.8%; P=.25). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT reduces acute hematologic and GI toxicity compared with standard treatment, with promising therapeutic outcomes. Positron emission tomography IG-IMRT reduces the incidence of acute neutropenia.
Chulalongkorn Hospital Bangkok Thailand
Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Department of Radiation Oncology Washington University St Louis Missouri
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center San Diego California
Marie Sklodowska Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Poland
MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
Tata Memorial Centre Parel Mumbai India
University of California San Diego La Jolla California
References provided by Crossref.org