Pegylované růstové faktory granulopoézy, lipegfilgrastim a pegfilgrastim, mají zásadní roli ve snížení rizika febrilní neutropenie a těžké neutropenie po chemoterapii, a pomáhají tak udržet i její dávkovou intenzitu. Lipegfilgrastim, zavedený od roku 2014, zůstává doposud dostupný v originální molekule a bez biosimilárního ekvivalentu. Data observačních studií i z reálné praxe dokládají jeho účinnost a bezpečnost.
Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim, play a crucial role in reducing the risk of febrile neutropenia and severe neutropenia after chemotherapy, and thus help maintain its dose intensity. Lipegfilgrastim, introduced in 2014, remains available as the original molecule and without its biosimilar equivalent. Data from observational studies and from real practice demonstrate its effectiveness and safety.
- MeSH
- centrální žilní katétry MeSH
- cévní přístupy MeSH
- denosumab aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů terapie MeSH
- nádory kostí farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- nádory plic * komplikace ošetřování terapie MeSH
- neutropenie chemicky indukované terapie MeSH
- odvykání kouření MeSH
- paliativní péče MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- trombóza prevence a kontrola terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- febrilní neutropenie vyvolaná chemoterapií diagnóza etiologie farmakoterapie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory plic * komplikace MeSH
- riziko MeSH
- syndrom systémové zánětlivé reakce diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- zánět * etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common complication of stem cell transplantation. AIM: To evaluate the frequency of sepsis in patients with FN colonized with resistant Gram-negative bacteria (extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and the choice of primary antibiotic in colonized patients. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed data from patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2018 to September 2022. Data were extracted from the hospital information system. FINDINGS: Carbapenem as the primary antibiotic of choice was chosen in 10.9% of non-colonized +/-AmpC patients, 31.5% of ESBL+ patients, and 0% of MDR P. aeruginosa patients. Patients with FN and MDR P. aeruginosa colonization had a high prevalence of sepsis (namely 100%, P = 0.0197). The spectrum of sepsis appeared to be different, with Gram-negative bacilli predominating in the ESBL+ group (OR: 5.39; 95% CI: 1.55-18.76; P = 0.0123). Colonizer sepsis was present in 100% of sepsis with MDR P. aeruginosa colonization (P = 0.002), all in allogeneic transplantation (P = 0.0003), with a mortality rate of 33.3% (P = 0.0384). The incidence of sepsis in patients with ESBL+ colonization was 25.9% (P = 0.0197), with colonizer sepsis in 50% of sepsis cases (P = 0.0002), most in allogeneic transplantation (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The results show a significant risk of sepsis in FN with MDR P. aeruginosa colonization, a condition almost exclusively caused by the colonizer. At the same time, a higher risk of Gram-negative sepsis has been demonstrated in patients colonized with ESBL+ bacteria.
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- febrilní neutropenie * mikrobiologie MeSH
- gramnegativní bakteriální infekce * farmakoterapie epidemiologie MeSH
- gramnegativní bakterie * účinky léků izolace a purifikace MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mnohočetná bakteriální léková rezistence MeSH
- přenašečství mikrobiologie epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sepse mikrobiologie MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) presents a life-threatening condition in immunocompromised patients, thus often prompting empirical administration of antifungal treatment, without adequate mycological evidence. Over the past years, wide use of antifungal prophylaxis resulted in decreased occurrence of IFD but has contributed to changes in the spectrum of fungal pathogens, revealing the occurrence of previously rare fungal genera causing breakthrough infections. The expanding spectrum of clinically relevant fungal pathogens required the implementation of screening approaches permitting broad rather than targeted fungus detection to support timely onset of pre-emptive antifungal treatment. To address this diagnostically important aspect in a prospective setting, we analyzed 935 serial peripheral blood (PB) samples from 195 pediatric and adult patients at high risk for IFD, involving individuals displaying febrile neutropenia during treatment of hematological malignancies or following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Two different panfungal-PCR-screening methods combined with ensuing fungal genus identification by Sanger sequencing were employed. In the great majority of PB-specimens displaying fungal DNAemia, the findings were transient and revealed fungi commonly regarded as non-pathogenic or rarely pathogenic even in the highly immunocompromised patient setting. Hence, to adequately exploit the diagnostic potential of panfungal-PCR approaches for detecting IFD, particularly if caused by hitherto rarely observed fungal pathogens, it is necessary to confirm the findings by repeated testing and to identify the fungal genus present by ensuing analysis. If applied appropriately, panfungal-PCR-screening can help prevent unnecessary empirical therapy, and conversely, contribute to timely employment of effective pre-emptive antifungal treatment strategies.
- MeSH
- antifungální látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- DNA fungální * analýza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- febrilní neutropenie * mikrobiologie MeSH
- hematologické nádory komplikace MeSH
- houby izolace a purifikace genetika MeSH
- imunokompromitovaný pacient * MeSH
- invazivní mykotické infekce epidemiologie prevence a kontrola etiologie mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preventing infections could significantly improve both survival and quality of life. Unfortunately, both infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with MDS are incompletely assessed due to the heterogeneity of disorders included in each publication, changing definitions over time, and lack of standardized prophylaxis practices. Despite these limitations, some basic statements can be made. Infections in MDS are associated with neutropenia. Patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS tend to have fewer infections compared to patients with higher-risk (HR) MDS, which may be related to the different prevalence of neutropenia in the 2 groups. Pneumonia is the most common infection, and bacteria are the most common pathogens. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are uncommon. Reactivation of latent viruses are rare. With the limited data available, we agree that antibacterial prophylaxis can be considered in patients with HR-MDS during severe neutropenia and early cycles of therapy when infections are most likely to occur. Given the low prevalence of IFI and viral reactivation, antimicrobial prophylaxis for these pathogens is less likely to be advantageous for most patients, although antifungal prophylaxis with activity against mold is commonly used in patients with persistent, profound neutropenia. Ultimately, improved data collection regarding infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis is needed to improve care for patients with MDS.
- MeSH
- bezpečnost potravin metody MeSH
- dieta * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- klinická studie jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neutropenie * dietoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
- MeSH
- autologní transplantace MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- fenylalanin * analogy a deriváty MeSH
- inhibitory proteasomu MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- melfalan * analogy a deriváty MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
- nádory plazmocelulární * MeSH
- neutropenie * MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class, alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, demonstrated clinical benefit in combination with dexamethasone in triple-class refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The phase I/IIa ANCHOR study evaluated melflufen (30 or 40 mg) and dexamethasone (40 mg with daratumumab; 20 mg followed by 40 mg with bortezomib; dose reduced if aged ≥75 years) in triplet combination with daratumumab (16 mg/kg; daratumumab arm) or bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2; bortezomib arm) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and/or a proteasome inhibitor and who had received one to four prior lines of therapy. Primary objectives were to determine the optimal dose of melflufen in triplet combination (phase I) and overall response rate (phase IIa). In total, 33 patients were treated in the daratumumab arm and 23 patients received therapy in the bortezomib arm. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported at either melflufen dose level with either combination. With both triplet regimens, the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia; thrombocytopenia was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. In the daratumumab arm, patients receiving melflufen 30 mg remained on treatment longer than those receiving the 40-mg dose. In the daratumumab arm, the overall response rate was 73% and median progression-free survival was 12.9 months. Notably, in the bortezomib arm, the overall response rate was 78% and median progression-free survival was 14.7 months. Considering the totality of the data, melflufen 30 mg was established as the recommended dose for use with dexamethasone and daratumumab or bortezomib for future studies in relapsed/refractory MM.
- MeSH
- bortezomib terapeutické užití MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- fenylalanin * analogy a deriváty MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- melfalan * analogy a deriváty MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
- nádory plazmocelulární * MeSH
- neutropenie * chemicky indukované MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- trombocytopenie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze I MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
