Survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for multiple sclerosis in Europe
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
28139062
DOI
10.1111/ene.13236
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- clinically isolated syndrome, radiologically isolated syndrome, relapsing−remitting,
- MeSH
- Delphi Technique MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Neurologists MeSH
- Disease Progression MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Health Care Surveys * MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting diagnosis diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Spinal Puncture MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Up-to-date information is needed on the extent to which neurologists treating multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe are integrating rapidly evolving diagnostic criteria, disease-modifying therapies and recommendations for monitoring disease activity into their clinical practice. METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists used a modified Delphi process to develop case- and practice-based questions for two sequential surveys distributed to MS neurologists throughout Europe. Case-based questions were developed for radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and RRMS with breakthrough disease. RESULTS: Multiple sclerosis neurologists from 11 European countries responded to survey 1 (n = 233) and survey 2 (n = 171). Respondents agreed that they would not treat the patients in the RIS or CIS cases but would treat a patient with a relatively mild form of RRMS. Choice of treatment was evenly distributed among first-line injectables and oral treatments for mild RRMS, and moved to second-line treatment as the RRMS case increased in severity. Additional results on RRMS with breakthrough disease are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was general agreement on some aspects of treatment, responses to other management and clinical practice questions varied considerably. These results, which reflect current clinical practice patterns, highlight the need for additional MS treatment education and awareness and may help inform the development of MS practice guidelines in Europe.
Department of Neurology Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Division of Neurology Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
Neuroimaging Research Unit Osepdale San Raffaele Milan Italy
Neurological Sciences MS Centre Rome Italy
Neurology and Department of Biomedicine Universitatsspital Basel Basel Switzerland
Neurology D CHU Lille Lille France
Neurology Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany
Neurology Institut des Neurosciences Cliniques de Rennes Rennes France
Public Management and Policy SDA Bocconi Scuola di Direzione Aziendale Milano Italy
References provided by Crossref.org