More than 5000 patients with metastatic melanoma in Europe per year do not have access to recommended first-line innovative treatments
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28264791
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.012
PII: S0959-8049(17)30069-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Access, Health expenditure per capita, Human development index, Immunooncology, Innovative medicines, Metastatic melanoma, Targeted therapy, Treatment,
- MeSH
- akrylonitril analogy a deriváty ekonomika zásobování a distribuce MeSH
- aniliny ekonomika zásobování a distribuce MeSH
- antigeny CD279 antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- dávkové mechanismy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- disparity zdravotní péče ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dostupnost zdravotnických služeb ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- experimentální terapie ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky ekonomika terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunoterapie ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- melanom ekonomika epidemiologie terapie MeSH
- nádory kůže ekonomika epidemiologie terapie MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny B-Raf antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- akrylonitril MeSH
- aniliny MeSH
- antigeny CD279 MeSH
- BRAF protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- MEK inhibitor I MeSH Prohlížeč
- PDCD1 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- protoonkogenní proteiny B-Raf MeSH
BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of innovative treatments for metastatic melanoma, their high costs has led to disparities in cancer care among different European countries. We analysed the availability of these innovative therapies in Europe and estimated the number of patients without access to first-line recommended treatment per current guidelines of professional entities such as the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and European Dermatology Forum (EDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Web-based online survey was conducted in 30 European countries with questions about the treatment schedules from 1st May 2015 to 1st May 2016: number of metastatic melanoma patients, registration and reimbursement of innovative medicines (updated data, as of 1st October 2016), percentage of patients treated and availability of clinical studies and compassionate-use programmes. RESULTS: The recommended BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) + MEK inhibitor (MEKi) combination was both registered and fully reimbursed in 9/30 (30%) countries, and in 13/30 (43%) (all from Eastern Europe) not reimbursed. First-line immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies was registered and fully reimbursed in 14/30 (47%) countries, while in 13/30 (43%) (all from Eastern Europe) not reimbursed. It was estimated that in Europe 19,600 patients with metastatic melanoma are treated, and 5238 (27%) do not have access to recommended first-line therapy. Significant correlation was found between human development index (HDI, UNDP report 2015), (r = 0.662; p < 0.001), health expenditure per capita (r = 0.695; p < 0.001) and the Mackenbach score of health policy performance (r = 0.765; p < 0.001) with the percentage of patients treated with innovative medicines and a number of reimbursed medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Great discrepancy exists in metastatic melanoma treatment across Europe. It is crucial to increase the awareness of national and European policymakers, oncological societies, melanoma patients' associations and pharma industry.
APHP Hospital Saint Louis Paris France
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Elias University Hospital Bucharest Romania
Centre for Dermatooncology Department of Dermatology Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen Germany
Clinic for Oncology and Radiotherapy Podgorica Montenegro
Clinic of Oncodermatology National Cancer Center Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Clinical Oncology Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain
Department of Dermatology and Allergology University of Szeged Hungary
Department of Dermatology and Venerology and Allergy Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Dermatology Medical Faculty Military Medical Academy Belgrade Serbia
Department of Dermatology Medical Faculty University of Coimbra Portugal
Department of Dermatology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Dermatology University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel Kiel Germany
Department of Dermatology Vilnius University Lithuania
Department of Oncology Odense University Hospital Denmark
Department of Oncology University Hospital Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina
Department of Oncology University Hospital Zagreb Croatia
Division of Dermatology and Venerology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
General Teaching Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Dermatology Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome Italy
Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia Belgrade Serbia
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Maria Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Warszawa Poland
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre Northwood United Kingdom
N N Alexandrov National Cancer Сenter of Belarus Minsk Belarus
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Greece
National Cancer Institute Kiev Ukraine
Netherland Cancer Institute Amsterdam Netherlands
NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center Moscow Russia
North Estonia Medical Centre Tallinn Estonia
Service de Dermatologie et Cancérologie Cutanée Hopital de la Timone Marseille France
UniversitätsSpital Zürich Skin Cancer Center University Hospital Zürich Switzerland
University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology Skopje Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice Zagreb Croatia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org