Heterocarpy enables species to effectively spread under unfavourable conditions by producing two or more types of fruit differing in ecological characteristics. Although it is frequent in annuals occupying disturbed habitats that are vulnerable to invasion, there is still a lack of congeneric studies addressing the importance of heterocarpy for species invasion success. We compared two pairs of heterocarpic Atriplex species, each of them comprising one invasive and one non-invasive non-native congener. In two common garden experiments, we (i) simulated the influence of different levels of nutrients and population density on plants grown from different types of fruits and examined several traits that are generally positively associated with invasion success, and (ii) grew plants in a replacement series experiment to evaluate resource partitioning between them and to compare their competitive ability. We found that specific functional traits or competitiveness of species cannot explain the invasiveness of Atriplex species, indicating that species invasiveness involves more complex interactions of traits that are important only in certain ecological contexts, i.e. in specific environmental conditions and only some habitats. Interestingly, species trait differences related to invasion success were found between plants growing from the ecologically most contrasting fruit types. We suggest that fruit types differing in ecological behaviour may be essential in the process of invasion or in the general spreading of heterocarpic species, as they either the maximize population growth (type C fruit) or enhance the chance of survival of new populations (type A fruit). Congeners offer the best available methodical framework for comparing traits among phylogenetically closely related invasive and non-invasive species. However, as indicated by our results, this approach is unlikely to reveal invasive traits because of the complexity underlying invasiveness.

Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Department of Genetic Ecology Institute of Botany Průhonice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Rejmánek M, Richardson DM. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology. 1996; 77: 1655–1661.

Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, et al. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett. 2005; 8: 1066–1074.

Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand? In: Nentwig W, editor. Biological invasions, Ecological Studies 193 Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. pp. 97–126.

van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13: 235–245. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x PubMed DOI

Groves RH, Panetta FD, Virtue JG. Weed risk assessment. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2001.

Dawson W, Burslem DFRP, Hulme PE. The comparative importance of species traits and introduction characteristics in tropical plant invasions. Divers Distrib. 2011; 17: 1111–1121.

Hawkes CV. Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. Am Nat. 2007; 170: 832–843. 10.1086/522842 PubMed DOI

Mason RAB, Cooke J, Moles AT, Leishman MR. Reproductive output of invasive versus native plants. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2008; 17: 633–640.

Ordonez A, Wright IJ, Olff H. Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison. Funct Ecol. 2010; 24: 1353–1361.

Daehler CC. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003; 34: 183–211.

Moles AT, Flores-Moreno H, Bonser SP, Warton DI, Helm A, Warman L, et al. Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea. J Ecol. 2012; 100: 116–127.

Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9: 981–993. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x PubMed DOI

Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2011; 14: 419–431. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01596.x PubMed DOI

Burns JH. A comparison of invasive and non‐invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib. 2004; 10: 387–397.

González AL, Kominoski JS, Danger M, Ishida S, Iwai N, Rubach A. Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions? Oikos. 2010; 119: 779–790.

Ordonez A, Olff H. Do alien plant species profit more from high resource supply than natives? A trait-based analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013; 22: 648–658.

Kueffer C, Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis and invasion syndromes. New Phytol. 2013; 200: 615–633. 10.1111/nph.12415 PubMed DOI

Leffler AJ, James JJ, Monaco TA, Sheley RL. A new perspective on trait differences between native and invasive exotic plants. Ecology. 2014; 95: 298–305. PubMed

Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol. 2000; 88: 528–534.

Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, et al. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology. 2008; 89: 1541–1553. PubMed

Mandák B. Seed heteromorphism and the life cycle of plants: a literature review. Preslia. 1997; 69: 129–159.

Baskin JM, Lu JJ, Baskin CC, Tan DY, Wang L. Diaspore dispersal ability and degree of dormancy in heteromorphic species of cold deserts of northwest China: A review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2014; 16: 93–99.

Imbert E. Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2002; 5: 13–36.

Cohen D. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol. 1966; 12: 119–129. PubMed

Venable DL, Lawlor L. Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia. 1980; 46: 272–282. 10.1007/BF00540137 PubMed DOI

Levin SA, Cohen D, Hastings A. Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theor Popul Biol. 1984; 26: 165–191.

Schoen DJ, Lloyd DG. The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diaspores. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 1984; 23: 303–322.

Venable DL, Brown JS. The population-dynamic functions of seed dispersal. Vegetatio. 1993; 108: 31–55.

Kistenmacher M, Gibson JP. Bet-hedging against larval herbivory and seed bank mortality in the evolution of heterocarpy. Am J Bot. 2016; 103: 1383–1395. 10.3732/ajb.1600078 PubMed DOI

Baker GA, O'Dowd DJ. Effect of parent plant density on the production of achene types in the annual Hypochoeris glabra. J Ecol. 1982; 70: 201–215.

Tanowitz BD, Salopek PF, Mahall BE. Differential germination of ray and disc achenes in Hemizonia increscens (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 1987; 74: 303–312.

Sorenson AE. Somatic polymorphism and seed dispersal. Nature. 1978; 276: 174–176.

Lu JJ, Tan DY, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Fruit and seed heteromorphism in the cold desert annual ephemeral Diptychocarpus strictus (Brassicaceae) and possible adaptive significance. Ann Bot 2010; 105: 999–1014. 10.1093/aob/mcq041 PubMed DOI PMC

Lu JJ, Tan DY, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Trade-offs between seed dispersal and dormancy in an amphi-basicarpic cold desert annual. Ann Bot. 2013; 112: 1815–1827. 10.1093/aob/mct240 PubMed DOI PMC

Wertis BA, Ungar IA. Seed demography and seedling survival in a population of Atriplex triangularis Willd. Am Midl Nat. 1986; 116: 152–162.

Brändel M. Dormancy and germination of heteromorphic achenes of Bidens frondosa. Flora. 2004; 199: 228–233.

Wang L, Huang ZY, Baskin CC, Baskin JM, Dong M. Germination of dimorphic seeds of the desert annual halophyte Suaeda aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae), a C4 plant without Kranz anatomy. Ann Bot. 2008; 102: 757–769. 10.1093/aob/mcn158 PubMed DOI PMC

Flint SD, Palmblad IG. Germination dimorphism and developmental flexibility in the ruderal weed Heterotheca grandiflora. Oecologia. 1978; 36: 33–43. 10.1007/BF00344569 PubMed DOI

Imbert E, Escarre J, Lepart J. Seed heteromorphism in Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): Performance of two morphs in different environments. Oikos. 1997; 79: 325–332.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. Effects of plant density and nutrient levels on fruit polymorphism in Atriplex sagittata. Oecologia. 1999; 119: 63–72. 10.1007/s004420050761 PubMed DOI

Mandák B, Pyšek P. How does density and nutrient stress affect allometry and fruit production in the heterocarpic species Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae)? Can J Bot. 1999; 77: 1106–1119.

Lu JJ, Tan DY, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Phenotypic plasticity and bet-hedging in a heterocarpic winter annual/spring ephemeral cold desert species of Brassicaceae. Oikos. 2012; 121: 357–366.

Mandák B. Germination requirements of invasive and non-invasive Atriplex species: a comparative study. Flora. 2003b; 198: 45–54.

Mandák B. Distribution of four Atriplex species with different degrees of invasiveness in the Czech Republic In: Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pyšek P, Wade PM, Williamson M, editors. Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. The Netherlands: Backhuys Publisher; 2003. pp. 313–328.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. Fruit dispersal and seed banks in Atriplex sagittata: the role of heterocarpy. J Ecol. 2001; 89: 159–165.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. The effects of light quality, nitrate concentration and presence of bracteoles on germination of different fruit types in the heterocarpous Atriplex sagittata. J Ecol. 2001; 89: 149–158.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. How does seed heteromorphism influence the life history stages of Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae)? Flora. 2005; 200: 516–526.

Muth NZ, Pigliucci M. Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. Am J Bot. 2006; 93: 188–196. 10.3732/ajb.93.2.188 PubMed DOI

Sukhorukov AP. Zur Systematik und Chorologie der in Russland und benachbarten Staaten (in den Grenzen der ehemaligen USSR) vorkommenden Atriplex-Arten (Chenopodiaceae). Ann Nat Hist Mus Wien Ser B Bot Zool. 2006; 108: 307–420.

Stutz HC, Chu GL, Sanderson SC. Evolutionary studies of Atriplex: phylogenetic relationships of Atriplex pleiantha. Am J Bot. 1990; 77: 364–369.

Kochánková J, Mandák B. Biological flora of Central Europe: Atriplex tatarica L. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2008; 10: 217–229.

Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib. 2000; 6: 93–107.

Aellen P. Atriplex In: Hegi G, editor. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 3/2 München: Carl Hanser Verlag; 1960. pp. 664–693.

Meusel H, Jäger EJ, Weinert E. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora Text u. Karten, Bd. 1 Jena: VEB Fischer; 1965.

Osmond CB, Björkman O, Anderson DJ. Physiological processes in Plant Ecology. Towards a synthesis with Atriplex Ecological Studies, vol. 36 Heidelberg: Springer; 1980.

Jalas J, Suominen J. Atlas Florae Europaeae Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. II Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

Májovský J, Murín A, Feráková V, Hindáková M, Schwarzová T, Uhríková A, et al. Karyotaxonomický prehľad flóry Slovenska. Bratislava: Veda; 1987.

Kirschner J, Tomšovic P. Atriplex In: Hejný S, Slavík B, editors. Flora of the Czech Republic, vol. 2 Praha: Academia; 1990. pp. 266–280.

Měsíček J, Jarolímová V. List of chromosome numbers of the Czech vascular plants. Praha: Academia; 1992.

Aellen P, Akeroyd JR. Atriplex L In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea, Psilotaceae to Platanaceae, vol. 1 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. pp. 135.

Hendry GAF, Grime JP. Methods in comparative plant ecology A laboratory manual. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993.

de Wit CT. On competition. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen. 1960; 66: 1–82.

Harper JL. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press; 1977.

Snyder KM, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Comparative ecology of the narrow endemic Echinacea tennesseensis and two geographically widespread congeners: relative competitive ability and growth characteristics. Int J Plant Sci. 1994; 155: 57–65.

Walck JL, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Relative competitive abilities and growth characteristics of a narrowly endemic and a geographically widespread Solidago species (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 1999; 86: 820–828. PubMed

R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: Vienna; 2015.

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004; 428: 821–827. 10.1038/nature02403 PubMed DOI

Mandák B, Pyšek P. History of the spread and habitat preferences of Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae) in the Czech Republic In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M, editors. Plant Invasions: Ecological mechanisms and human responses. The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, Leiden; 1998. pp. 209–224.

Khan MA, Gul B, Weber DJ. Temperature and high salinity effects in germinating dimorphic seeds of Atriplex rosea. West N Am Nat. 2004; 64: 193–201.

Zündorf HJ, Günther KF, Korsch H, Westhus W. Flora von Thüringen. Jena: Weissdorn-Verlag; 2006.

Jarzyna I, Malecka K, Panufnik-Medrzycka D, Medrzycki P. Dynamics and occurrence patterns of the tatarian orache Atriplex tatarica L. (Chenopodiaceae) at the roadsides in Warsaw, Poland. Acta Soc Bot Pol Pol Tow Bot. 2010; 79: 249–254.

Beadle NCW. Studies on halophytes. I. The germination of the seeds and establishment of the seedlings of five species of Atriplex in Australia. Ecology. 1952; 33: 49–62.

Koller D. Germination-regulating mechanisms in some desert seeds. IV. Atriplex dimorphostegia Kar. et Kir. Ecology. 1957; 38: 1–13.

Koller D. Analysis of the dual action of white light on germination of Atriplex dimorphostegia (Chenopodiaceae). Israel Journal of Botany. 1970; 19: 499–516.

Drake DR, Ungar IA. Effect of salinity, nitrogen and population density on the survival, growth and reproduction of Atriplex triangularis (Chenopodiaceae). Am J Bot. 1989; 76: 1125–1135.

Li W, An P, Liu X, Khan MA, Tsuji W, Tanaka K. The effect of light, temperature and bracteoles on germination of polymorphic seeds of Atriplex centralasiatica Iljin under saline conditions. Seed Sci Technol. 2008; 36: 325–338.

Kochánková J, Mandák B. How do population genetic parameters affect germination of the heterocarpic species Atriplex tatarica (Amaranthaceae)? Ann Bot. 2009; 103: 1303–1313. 10.1093/aob/mcp073 PubMed DOI PMC

Ellison AM. Effect of seed dimorphism on the density-dependent dynamics of experimental populations of Atriplex triangularis (Chenopodiaceae). Am J Bot. 1987; 74: 1280–1288.

The role of fruit heteromorphism in the naturalization of Asteraceae

Development, characterization, and cross-amplification of 16 microsatellite primers for Atriplex tatarica (Amaranthaceae)