How do population genetic parameters affect germination of the heterocarpic species Atriplex tatarica (Amaranthaceae)?

. 2009 Jun ; 103 (8) : 1303-13. [epub] 20090401

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid19339299

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The heterocarpic species Atriplex tatarica produces two types of seeds. In this study, how basic population genetic parameters correlate with seed germinability under various experimental conditions was tested. METHODS: Population genetic diversity was ascertained in eight populations of A. tatarica by assessing patterns of variation at nine allozyme loci. Germinability of both seed types from all sampled populations was determined by a common laboratory experiment under different salinity levels. Basic population genetic parameters, i.e. percentage of polymorphic loci, average number of alleles per locus and observed heterozygosity were correlated with observed population germination characteristics. KEY RESULTS: Atriplex tatarica possesses a remarkable heterocarpy, i.e. one type of seed is non-dormant and the other shows different dormancy levels in relation to experimental conditions. Significant negative correlations have been detected between germination of both seed types and the coefficient of inbreeding, and a significant negative correlation between germination of dormant seeds and other population genetic parameters, i.e. percentage of polymorphic loci and average number of alleles per polymorphic locus. Moreover, populations from the region characterized by a shorter growing season manifested higher germinability, i.e. had lower dormancy, than those from the lower-latitude one. CONCLUSIONS: In general, germination of non-dormant seeds is probably not under strong genetic control. Hence, they germinate as soon as conditions are favourable, thus ensuring survival in the short term, but populations risk local extinction if conditions become adverse (i.e. a high-risk strategy). In contrast, germination of the dormant type of seeds is under stronger genetic control and is significantly correlated with basic population genetic parameters. These seeds ensure long-term reproduction and survival in the field by protracted germination, albeit in low quantities (i.e. A. tatarica also adopts a low-risk strategy).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aellen P. In: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Hegi G, editor. 3/2. München; 1960. pp. 664–693. Atriplex [in German]

Ågren J, Schemske DW. Outcrossing rates and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution. 1993;47:125–135. PubMed

Armbruster P, Reed DH. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity. 2005;95:235–242. PubMed

Baker GA, O'Dowd DJ. Effects of parent plant-density on the production of achene types in the annual Hypochoeris glabra. Journal of Ecology. 1982;70:201–215.

Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature. 1991;352:522–524. PubMed

Baskin CC, Baskin JM. Seeds – ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998.

Baskin JM, Baskin CC. Plant population differences in dormancy and germination characteristics of seeds: heredity or environment? The American Midland Naturalist. 1973;90:493–498.

Brändel M. Dormancy and germination of heteromorphic achenes of Bidens frondosa. Flora. 2004;199:228–233.

Brändel M. Ecology of achene dimorphism in Leontodon saxatilis. Annals of Botany. 2007;100:1189–1197. PubMed PMC

Byers DL, Waller DM. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1999;30:479–513.

Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1987;18:237–268.

Cheptou P-O, Lepart J, Escarré J. Differential outcrossing rates in dispersing and non-dispersing achenes in the heterocarpic plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae) Evolutionary Ecology. 2001;15:1–13.

Cohen D. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1966;12:119–129. PubMed

Cook SA, Atsatt PR, Simon CA. Doves and dove weed: multiple defenses against avian predation. BioScience. 1971;21:277–281.

Crawley MJ. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2002.

Dittbrenner A, Hensen I, Wesche K. Genetic structure and random amplified polymorphic DNA diversity of the rapidly declining Angelica palustris (Apiaceae) in Eastern Germany in relation to population size and seed production. Plant Species Biology. 2005;20:191–200.

Dole J, Ritland K. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution. 1993;47:361–373. PubMed

Dudash MR. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-incompatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution. 1990;44:1129–1139. PubMed

Eckert CG, Barrett SCH. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Deconon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population-genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution. 1994;48:952–964. PubMed

Fischer M, Matthies D. RAPD-Variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianellaceae) American Journal of Botany. 1998;85:1685–1692. PubMed

Flint SD, Palmblad IG. Germination dimorphism and developmental flexibility in the ruderal weed Heterotheca grandiflora. Oecologia. 1978;36:33–43. PubMed

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

Gibson JP. Ecological and genetic comparison between ray and disc achene pools of the heteromorphic species Prionopsis ciliata (Asteraceae) International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2001;162:137–145.

Gibson JP, Tomlinson AD. Genetic diversity and mating system comparisons between ray and disc achene seed pools of the heterocarpic species Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae) International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2002;163:1025–1034.

Goodwillie C, Knight MC. Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: a comparison of three populations. Annals of Botany. 2006;98:351–360. PubMed PMC

Goudet J. Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity. 1995;86:485–486.

Hendry GAF, Grime JP. Methods in comparative plant ecology: a laboratory manual. London: Chapman and Hall; 1993.

Hensen I, Wesche K. Population size affects plant fitness in the rare Dictamnus albus in Central Germany. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2006;15:2249–2261.

Holtsford TP, Ellstrand NC. Inbreeding effects in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae) populations with different natural outcrossing rates. Evolution. 1990;44:2031–2046. PubMed

Husband BC, Schemske DW. Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae) Heredity. 1995;75:206–215.

Husband BC, Schemske DW. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution. 1996;50:54–70. PubMed

Imbert E. Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2002;5:13–36.

Imbert E, Escarré J, Lepart J. Seed heteromorphism in Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): performance of two morphs in different environments. Oikos. 1997;79:325–332.

Jain SK. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 1976;7:469–495.

Johnston MO, Schoen DJ. Mutation rates and dominance levels of genes affecting total fitness in two angiosperm species. Science. 1995;267:226–228. PubMed

Johnston MO, Schoen DJ. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: an experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae) Evolution. 1996;50:1478–1491. PubMed

Keller LF, Waller DM. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002;17:230–241.

Kochánková J, Mandák B. Biological flora of Central Europe: Atriplex tatarica L. Perspectives in Plant Ecology. Evolution and Systematics. 2008;10:217–229.

Koelewijn HP, Van Damme JMM. Effects of seed size, inbreeding and maternal sex on offspring fitness in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus. Journal of Ecology. 2005;93:373–383.

Lande R, Schemske DW. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic model. Evolution. 1985;39:24–40. PubMed

Levin SD, Cohen D, Hastings A. Dispersal strategies in patchy environment. Theoretical Population Biology. 1984;26:165–191.

Lynch M, Connery J, Bürger R. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist. 1995;146:489–518.

Mandák B. Seed heteromorphism and the life cycle of plants, a literature review. Preslia. 1997;69:129–159.

Mandák B. Distribution of four Atriplex species with different degrees of invasiveness in the Czech Republic. In: Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, et al., editors. Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. a. Leiden: Backhuys Publisher; 2003. pp. 313–328.

Mandák B. Germination requirements of invasive and non-invasive Atriplex species: a comparative study. Flora. 2003;b 198:45–54.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. Fruit dispersal and seed banks in Atriplex sagittata: the role of heterocarpy. Journal of Ecology. 2001;a 89:159–165.

Mandák B, Pyšek P. The effects of light quality, nitrate concentration and presence of bracteoles on germination of different fruit types in the heterocarpous Atriplex sagittata. Journal of Ecology. 2001;b 89:149–158.

Mandák B, Bímová K, Plačková I, Mahelka V, Chrtek J. Loss of genetic variation in geographically marginal populations of Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae) Annals of Botany. 2005;96:901–912. PubMed PMC

Mandák B, Bímová K, Mahelka V, Plačková I. How much genetic variation is stored in the seed bank? A study of Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae) Molecular Ecology. 2006;a 15:2653–2663. PubMed

Mandák B, Bímová K, Plačková I. Genetic structure of experimental populations and reproductive fitness in a heterocarpic plant Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae) American Journal of Botany. 2006;b 93:1640–1649. PubMed

Meusel H, Jäger E, Weinert E. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Jena: Gustaf Fischer Verlag; 1965.

Mustajärvi K, Siikamäki P, Åkerberg A. Inbreeding depression in perennial Lychnis viscaria (Caryophyllaceae): effects of population mating history and nutrient availability. American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1853–1861. PubMed

Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89:583–590. PubMed PMC

Osmond CB, Björkman O, Anderson DJ. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1980. Physiological processes in plant ecology – towards a synthesis with Atriplex.

Ouborg NJ, van Treuren R. Variation in fitness-related characters among small and large populations of Salvia pratensis. Journal of Ecology. 1995;83:369–380.

Payne AM, Maun MA. Dispersal and floating ability of dimorphic fruit segments of Cakile edentula var. Lacustris. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1981;59:2595–2602.

Picó FX, Koubek T. Inbreeding effects on fitness traits in the heterocarpic herb Leontodon autumnalis L. (Asteraceae) Acta Oecologica. 2003;24:289–294.

Quinn JA, Colosi JC. Separating genotype from environment in germination ecology studies. The American Midland Naturalist. 1977;97:484–489.

Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW. A test of sib-competition hypothesis for outcrossing advantage in Impatiens capensis. Evolution. 1987;41:579–590. PubMed

Schmitt J, Gamble SE. The effect of distance from the parental site in offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution. 1990;44:2002–2030. PubMed

Sorenson AE. Somatic polymorphism and seed dispersal. Nature. 1978;276:174–176.

S-PLUS. S-PLUS® for Windows 2000. Guide to Statistics. Seattle, WA: Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft; 1999.

StatSoft. Statistica for Windows. 2nd edn. USA: Tulsa, Oklahoma; 1998.

Tolasz R, et al. Climate atlas of Czechia. Praha: ČHMÚ; 2007.

Venable DL. The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. American Naturalist. 1985;126:577–595.

Venable DL. Modelling the evolutionary ecology of seed banks. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, editors. Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1989. pp. 67–87.

Venable DL, Brown JS. The population-dynamic functions of seed dispersal. Vegetatio. 1993;107/108:31–55.

Vergeer P, Rengelink R, Copal A, Ouborg NJ. The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. Journal of Ecology. 2003;91:18–26.

Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358–1370. PubMed

Yeh FC, Yang R-C, Boyle T. POPGENE version 1.32. Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. 1999 http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/index.htm . 25 March 2009.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...