Animal vocalizations contain information about individual identity that could potentially be used for the monitoring of individuals. However, the performance of individual discrimination is subjected to many biases depending on factors such as the amount of identity information, or methods used. These factors need to be taken into account when comparing results of different studies or selecting the most cost-effective solution for a particular species. In this study, we evaluate several biases associated with the discrimination of individuals. On a large sample of little owl male individuals, we assess how discrimination performance changes with methods of call description, an increasing number of individuals, and number of calls per male. Also, we test whether the discrimination performance within the whole population can be reliably estimated from a subsample of individuals in a pre-screening study. Assessment of discrimination performance at the level of the individual and at the level of call led to different conclusions. Hence, studies interested in individual discrimination should optimize methods at the level of individuals. The description of calls by their frequency modulation leads to the best discrimination performance. In agreement with our expectations, discrimination performance decreased with population size. Increasing the number of calls per individual linearly increased the discrimination of individuals (but not the discrimination of calls), likely because it allows distinction between individuals with very similar calls. The available pre-screening index does not allow precise estimation of the population size that could be reliably monitored. Overall, projects applying acoustic monitoring at the individual level in population need to consider limitations regarding the population size that can be reliably monitored and fine-tune their methods according to their needs and limitations.

Department of Behvioural Ecology Faculty of Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań Poland

Ethology Department Institute of Animal Science Praha Uhříněves Czech Republic

Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha Czech Republic

Institute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Brno Czech Republic

Erratum v

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203357. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48: 758–767.

Wilson DR, Battiston M, Brzustowski J, Mennill DJ. Sound Finder: a new software approach for localizing animals recorded with a microphone array. Bioacoustics. 2014;23: 99–112.

Merchant ND, Fristrup KM, Johnson MP, Tyack PL, Witt MJ, Blondel P, et al. Measuring acoustic habitats. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6: 257–265. 10.1111/2041-210X.12330 PubMed DOI PMC

Petrusková T, Pišvejcová I, Kinštová A, Brinke T, Petrusek A. Repertoire-based individual acoustic monitoring of a migratory passerine bird with complex song as an efficient tool for tracking territorial dynamics and annual return rates. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015; n/a–n/a.

Robertson BC. Vocal mate recognition in a monogamous, flock-forming bird, the silvereye, Zosterops lateralis. Anim Behav. 1996;51: 303–311.

Delport W, Kemp AC, Ferguson JWH. Vocal identification of individual African Wood Owls Strix woodfordii: a technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency. Ibis. 2002;144: 30–39.

Feng AS, Riede T, Arch VS, Yu Z, Xu Z-M, Yu X-J, et al. Diversity of the vocal signals of concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota): evidence for individual signatures. Ethology. 2009;115: 1015–1028.

Schneiderová I, Policht R. Alarm Calls of the European Ground Squirrel Spermophilus Citellus and the Taurus Ground Squirrel S. Taurensis Encode Information About Caller Identity. Bioacoustics- Int J Anim Sound Its Rec. 2010;20: 29–43.

Amorim MCP, Simoes JM, Almada VC, Fonseca PJ. Stereotypy and variation of the mating call in the Lusitanian toadfish, Halobatrachus didactylus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65: 707–716.

Antunes R, Schulz T, Gero S, Whitehead H, Gordon J, Rendell L. Individually distinctive acoustic features in sperm whale codas. Anim Behav. 2011;81: 723–730.

Cinková I, Policht R. Contact Calls of the Northern and Southern White Rhinoceros Allow for Individual and Species Identification. Plos One. 2014;9: e98475 10.1371/journal.pone.0098475 PubMed DOI PMC

Salmi R, Hammerschmidt K, Doran-Sheehy DM. Individual Distinctiveness in Call Types of Wild Western Female Gorillas. Plos One. 2014;9: e101940 10.1371/journal.pone.0101940 PubMed DOI PMC

Taylor AM, Reby D. The contribution of source—filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. J Zool. 2010;280: 221–236.

Janik VM, Sayigh LS. Communication in bottlenose dolphins: 50 years of signature whistle research. J Comp Physiol -Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2013;199: 479–489. PubMed

Tibbetts E, Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22: 529–537. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001 PubMed DOI

Feng J-J, Cui L-W, Ma C-Y, Fei H-L, Fan P-F. Individuality and Stability in Male Songs of Cao Vit Gibbons (Nomascus nasutus) with Potential to Monitor Population Dynamics. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e96317 10.1371/journal.pone.0096317 PubMed DOI PMC

Klenova AV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV. Examination of pair-duet stability to promote long-term monitoring of the endangered red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis). J Ethol. 2008;27: 401–406.

Peake TM, McGregor PK, Smith KW, Tyler G, Gilbert G, Green RE. Individuality in Corncrake Crex crex vocalizations. Ibis. 1998;140: 120–127.

Terry AM, Peake TM, McGregor PK. The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front Zool. 2005;2: 10 10.1186/1742-9994-2-10 PubMed DOI PMC

Adi K, Johnson MT, Osiejuk TS. Acoustic censusing using automatic vocalization classification and identity recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127: 874–883. 10.1121/1.3273887 PubMed DOI

Laiolo P, Vogeli M, Serrano D, Tella J. Testing acoustic versus physical marking: two complementary methods for individual-based monitoring of elusive species. J Avian Biol. 2007;38: 672–681.

Terry AMR, McGregor PK. Census and Monitoring Based on Individually Identifiable Vocalizations: The Role of Neural Networks. Anim Conserv. 2002;5: 103–111.

Janik VM. Pitfalls in the categorization of behaviour: a comparison of dolphin whistle classification methods. Anim Behav. 1999;57: 133–143. 10.1006/anbe.1998.0923 PubMed DOI

Arriaga JG, Sanchez H, Hedley R, Vallejo EE, Taylor CE. Using Song to Identify Cassin’s Vireo Individuals. A Comparative Study of Pattern Recognition Algorithms In: Martínez-Trinidad JF, Carrasco-Ochoa JA, Olvera-Lopez JA, Salas-Rodríguez J, Suen CY, editors. Pattern Recognition. Springer International Publishing; 2014. pp. 291–300.

Kirschel ANG, Earl DA, Yao Y, Escobar IA, Vilches E, Vallejo EE, et al. Using Songs to Identify Individual Mexican Antthrush Formicarius Moniliger: Comparison of Four Classification Methods. Bioacoustics. 2009;19: 1–20.

Xia C, Lin X, Liu W, Lloyd H, Zhang Y. Acoustic Identification of Individuals within Large Avian Populations: A Case Study of the Brownish-Flanked Bush Warbler, South-Central China. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e42528 10.1371/journal.pone.0042528 PubMed DOI PMC

Kennedy RAW, Evans CS, McDonald PG. Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala. J Avian Biol. 2009;40: 481–490.

Fox EJS. A new perspective on acoustic individual recognition in animals with limited call sharing or changing repertoires. Anim Behav. 2008;75: 1187–1194.

Budka M, Osiejuk TS. Formant frequencies are acoustic cues to caller discrimination and are a weak indicator of the body size of corncrake males. Ethology. 2013;119: 960–969.

Ptáček L, Machlica L, Linhart P, Jaška P, Müller L. Automatic recognition of bird individuals on an open set using as- is recordings. Bioacoustics- Int J Anim Sound Its Rec. 2016;25: 55–73.

Cheng J, Sun Y, Ji L. A call-independent and automatic acoustic system for the individual recognition of animals: A novel model using four passerines. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43: 3846–3852.

Budka M, Wojas L, Osiejuk TS. Is it possible to acoustically identify individuals within a population? J Ornithol. 2014;156: 481–488.

Beecher M. Signaling systems for individual recognition—an information-theory approach. Anim Behav. 1989;38: 248–261.

Pollard KA, Blumstein DT, Griffin SC. Pre-screening acoustic and other natural signatures for use in noninvasive individual identification. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47: 1103–1109.

Lengagne T, Lauga J, Jouventin P. A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins. Comptes Rendus Académie Sci Sér III Sci Vie. 1997;320: 885–891. PubMed

Lengagne T. Temporal Stability in the individual features in the calls of eagle owls (Bubo bubo). Behaviour. 2001;138: 1407–1419.

Odom KJ, Slaght JC, Gutiérrez R j. Distinctiveness in the Territorial Calls of Great Horned Owls within and among Years. J Raptor Res. 2013;47: 21–30.

Nieuwenhuyse DV, Génot J-C, Johnson DH. The Little Owl: Conservation, Ecology and Behavior of Athene noctua. Cambridge University Press; 2008.

Exo KM, Scherzinger W. Voice and inventory of call-notes of the little owl (Athene noctua): description, context andhabitat adaptation. Ecol Birds. 1989; 149–187.

Jacobsen LB, Sunde P, Carsten R, Dabelsteen T, Thorup K. Territorial calls in the Little Owl (Athene noctua): spatial dispersion and social interplay of mates and neighbours. Ornis Fenn. 2013; 41–49.

Hardouin LA, Tabel P, Bretagnolle V. Neighbour—stranger discrimination in the little owl, Athene noctua. Anim Behav. 2006;72: 105–112.

Zmihorski M, Altenburg-Bacia D, Romanowski J, Kowalski M, Osojca G. Long-term decline of the little owl (Athene noctua Scop., 1769) in Central Poland. Pol J Ecol. 2006;54: 321–324.

Šálek M, Schröpfer L. Population decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Czech Republic. Pol J Ecol. 2008;56: 527–534.

Šálek M. Dlouhodobý pokles početnosti sýčka obecného (Athene noctua) v jádrové oblasti jeho rozšíření v Čechách. Sylvia. 2014;50: 2–11.

Šálek M, Chrenková M, Kipson M. High Population Density of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Hortobagy National Park, Hungary, Central Europe. Pol J Ecol. 2013;61: 165–169.

Šálek M, Chrenková M, Dobrý M, Kipson M, Grill S, Václav R. Scale-dependent habitat associations of a rapidly declining farmland predator, the Little Owl Athene noctua, in contrasting agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;224: 56–66.

Exo KM. Tagesperiodische Aktivitätsmuster des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Vogelwarte. 1989;35: 99–114.

Weary D, Norris K, Falls J. Song Features Birds Use to Identify Individuals. Auk. 1990;107: 623–625.

Milligan JL, Davis AK, Altizer SM. Errors Associated with Using Colored Leg Bands to Identify Wild Birds (Errores asociados con el uso de bandas coloreadas para las patas para identificar aves silvestres). J Field Ornithol. 2003;74: 111–118.

Medvin MB, Stoddard PK, Beecher MD. Signals for parent-offspring recognition: a comparative analysis of the begging calls of cliff swallows and barn swallows. Anim Behav. 1993;45: 841–850.

Beecher M. Signature Systems and Kin Recognition. Am Zool. 1982;22: 477–490.

Fernandez-Juricic E, del Nevo AJ, Poston R. Identification of Individual and Population-Level Variation in Vocalizations of the Endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (empidonax Traillii Extimus). Auk. 2009;126: 89–99.

Lein MR. Song Variation in Buff-Breasted Flycatchers (Empidonax fulvifrons). Wilson J Ornithol. 2008;120: 256–267.

Xia C, Huang R, Wei C, Nie P, Zhang Y. Individual identification on the basis of the songs of the Asian Stubtail (Urosphena squameiceps). Chin BIRDS. 2011;2: 132–139.

Grava T, Mathevon N, Place E, Balluet P. Individual acoustic monitoring of the European Eagle Owl Bubo bubo. Ibis. 2008;150: 279–287.

Rognan CB, Szewczak JM, Morrison ML. Vocal Individuality of Great Gray Owls in the Sierra Nevada. J Wildl Manag. 2009;73: 755–760.

Wiley RH. Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: implications for the evolution of social behaviour. Biol Rev. 2013;88: 179–195. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00246.x PubMed DOI

Automatic acoustic identification of individuals in multiple species: improving identification across recording conditions