Biodiversity is known to increase ecosystem functioning. However, species vary in their contributions to ecosystem processes. Here, we investigated seven ecosystem functions based on the consumption of different resources in tropical ant communities. We analysed how different species influence site-level resource consumption, and determined how each species influenced performance and stability of these functions. Based on simulated extinctions, we identified 'key species' with significant functional contributions. We then investigated which traits, such as biomass, abundance, and specialisation, characterized them, and compared trait distributions across four sites to analyse differences in functional redundancy. Only few species significantly influenced ecosystem functions. Common generalist species tended to be the most important drivers of many ecosystem functions, though several specialist species also proved to be important in this study. Moreover, species-specific ecological impacts varied across sites. In addition, we found that functional redundancy varied across sites, and was highest in sites where the most common species did not simultaneously have the greatest functional impacts. Furthermore, redundancy was enhanced in sites where species were less specialised and had more even incidence distributions. Our study demonstrates that the ecological importance of a species depends on its functional traits, but also on the community context. It cannot be assessed without investigating its species-specific performance across multiple functions. Hence, to assess functional redundancy in a habitat and the potential for compensation of species loss, researchers need to study species-specific traits that concern functional performance as well as population dynamics and tolerance to environmental conditions.

Institute of Entomology Biology Centre of Academy of Sciences and Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branisovska Ceske Budjovice Czech Republic

Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolutionary Biology University of Mainz Mainz Germany

See more in PubMed

Ecology. 2016 Jan;97(1):225-35 PubMed

Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):188-90 PubMed

Nature. 2011 Aug 10;477(7363):199-202 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2010 Jan;13(1):76-86 PubMed

Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8 PubMed

Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1545-8 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2015 Mar;18(3):254-62 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):14-9 PubMed

Oecologia. 2011 Jul;166(3):761-8 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2006 Nov;75(6):1370-8 PubMed

Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):626-35 PubMed

BMC Ecol. 2006 Aug 14;6:9 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2011 May;80(3):548-57 PubMed

Oecologia. 2010 Dec;164(4):1061-73 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jan;79(1):71-81 PubMed

Ecol Appl. 2009 Oct;19(7):1858-67 PubMed

Nature. 2006 Oct 26;443(7114):989-92 PubMed

Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2427-39 PubMed

Niche differentiation in rainforest ant communities across three continents