The Present SP Tests for Determining the Transition Temperature TSP on "U" Notch Disc Specimens

. 2017 May 03 ; 10 (5) : . [epub] 20170503

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28772851

The principal difference between the small punch (SP) testing technique and standardized impact testing lies in the fact that the SP tests carried out in accordance with CWA 15627 Small Punch Test Method for Metallic Materials use disc-shaped test specimens without a notch. Especially in tough materials, the temperature dependence of SP fracture energy ESP in the transition area is very steep and lies close to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. In this case, the determination of SP transition temperature TSP can lead to significant errors in its determination. Efforts to move the transition area of penetration testing closer to the transition area of standardized impact tests led to the proposal of the notched disc specimen 8 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in thickness with a "U" shaped notch 0.2 mm deep in the axis plane of the disc. The paper summarizes the results obtained to date when determining the transition temperature of SP tests TSP, determined according to CWA 15627 for material of pipes made of P92, P22, and a heat treated 14MoV6-3 steel in the as delivered state. Although the results obtained confirmed the results of other works in that the presence of a notch in a SP disc is insufficient to increase the transition temperature significantly and certainly not to the values obtained by Charpy testing, comparison of the different behaviors of the alloys tested reveals some evidence that the notch reduces the energy for initiation. This implies that the test on a notched disc is more a test of crack growth and would be a useful instrument if included in the forthcoming EU standard for SP testing.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

CEN WORKSHOP AGREEMENT . Small Punch Test Method for Metallic Materials. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2007. CWA 15627:2007 D/E/F.

Hurst R., Matocha K. Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques Tensile and Fracture Behaviour; Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference SSTT; Castle Seggau near Graz, Austria. 23–25 September 2014; pp. 1–26.

Hurst R.C., Matocha K. Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques; Proceedings of the 1st International Conference SSTT; Ostrava, Czech Republic. 31 August–2 September 2010; pp. 5–11.

Hurst R., Matocha K. Determination of Mechanical properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques; Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference SSTT; Ostrava, Czech Republic. 2–4 October 2012; pp. 4–18.

Ha J.S., Fleury E. Small punch tests to estimate the mechanical properties of steels for steam power plant: II. Fracture toughness. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 1998;75:707–7013. doi: 10.1016/S0308-0161(98)00075-1. DOI

Foulds J.R., Viswanathan R. Small punch testing for determining the material toughness of low alloy components in service. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 1994;116:457–464. doi: 10.1115/1.2904313. DOI

Turba K., Hurst R., Hähner P. Determination of Mechanical Properties by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques; Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference SSTT; Ostrava, Czech Republic. 2–4 October 2012; pp. 196–202.

Matocha K. Determination of Actual Tensile and Fracture Characteristics of Critical Components of Industrial Plants under Long Term Operation by SPT; Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Pressure Vessels & Piping Division Conference; Toronto, ON, Canada. 2012; pp. 15–19.

Matocha K. Small Specimen Test Techniques: 6th Volume. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2015. Small Punch Testing for Tensile and Fracture Behaviour–Experiences and way forward; pp. 145–159. ASTM STP1576.

Ju J.-B., Jang J., Kwon D. Evaluation of fracture toughness by small-punch testing techniques using sharp notched specimens. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2003;80:221–228. doi: 10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00042-5. DOI

Cuesta I.I., Rodriguez C., Belzunce F.J., Alegr J.M. Analysis of different techniques for obtaining pro-cracked/notched small punch test specimens. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2011;18:2282–2287. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.08.004. DOI

Lacalle R., Álvarez J.A., Cicero S., Gutiérrez-Solana F. From Archaeology to Precious Metals: Four Applications of Small Punch test. Metall. J. 2010;63:59–68.

Turba K., Gůlcimen B., Li Y., Blagoeva D., Hähner P., Hurst R. Introduction of a new notched specimen geometry to determine fracture properties by small punch testing. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2011;78:2826–2833. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.014. DOI

Adams J., Bache M.R., Hurst R.C., Borradaile J.B. Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques; Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference SSTT; Castle Seggau near Graz, Austria. 23–25 September 2014; pp. 1–26.

Adams J. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Swansea; Swansea, UK: 2015. Development of Small Specimen Test Techniques for Toughness Measurement.

Blagoeva D., LI Y.Z., Hurst R.C. Qualification of P91 welds through small punch creep testing. J. Nucl. Mater. 2011;409:124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.015. DOI

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

Tensile and Creep Testing of Sanicro 25 Using Miniature Specimens

. 2018 Jan 16 ; 11 (1) : . [epub] 20180116

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...