Stomatal conductance directly modifies plant water relations and photosynthesis. Many environmental factors affecting the stomatal conductance have been intensively studied but temperature has been largely neglected, even though it is one of the fastest changing environmental variables and it is rising due to climate change. In this study, we describe how stomata open when the temperature increases. Stomatal conductance increased by ca 40% in a broadleaf and a coniferous species, poplar (Populus deltoides x nigra) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) when temperature was increased by 10 °C, from 30 °C to 40 °C at a constant vapor pressure deficit of 1 kPa. The mechanism of regulating stomatal conductance by temperature was, at least partly, independent of other known mechanisms linked to water status and carbon metabolism. Stomatal conductance increased with rising temperature despite the decrease in leaf water potential, increase in transpiration, increase in intercellular CO2 concentration and was decoupled from photosynthesis. Increase in xylem and mesophyll hydraulic conductance coming from lower water viscosity may to some degree explain temperature dependent opening of stomata. The direct stomatal response to temperature allows plants to benefit from increased evaporative cooling during the heat waves and from lower stomatal limitations to photosynthesis but they may be jeopardized by faster depletion of soil water.

b Siberian Federal University Krasnoyarsk Russia

c Institute of Plant Breeding Genetics and Genomics University of Georgia Athens GA USA

Daniel B Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

Department of Forest Botany Dendrology and Geobiocenology Mendel University in Brno Czech Republic

Addendum to: Urban J, Ingwers MW, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra. J Exp Bot. 2017;68:1757-67. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx052. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Meehl GA, Tebaldi C. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science. 2004;305:994-7. PubMed

Perkins SE, Alexander L V, Nairn JR. Increasing frequency, intensity and duration of observed global heatwaves and warm spells. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39:1-5.

Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R. Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2415-23. PubMed PMC

Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature. 1979;282:424-6.

Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R. A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1097-116.

Teskey R, Wertin T, Bauweraerts I, Ameye M, McGuire MA, Steppe K. Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:1699-712. PubMed

Peak D, Mott KA. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:162-78. PubMed

Mott KA, Peak D. Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36:936-44. PubMed

Lu Z, Quiñones M, Zeiger E. Temperature dependence of guard cell respiration and stomatal conductance co-segregate in an F2 population of Pima cotton. Funct Plant Biol. 2000;27:457-62.

Mott KA, Peak D. Stomatal responses to humidity and temperature in darkness. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:1084-90. PubMed

Schulze E, Lange OL, Evenari M, Kappen L, Buschbom U. The role of air humidity and leaf temperature incontrolling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions. I. A simulation of the daily course of stomatal resistance. Oecologia. 1974;17:159-70. PubMed

Freeden AL, Sage RF. Temperature and humidity effects on branchlet gas-exchange in white spruce: an explanation for the increase in transpiration with branchlet temperature. Trees. 1999;14:161-8.

Sage RF, Sharkey TD. The effect of temperature on the occurrence of O2 and CO2 Insensitive photosynthesis in field grown plants. Plant Physiol. 1987;84:658-64. PubMed PMC

Teskey R, Fites J, Samuelson L, Bongarten BC. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions. Tree Physiol. 1986;2:131-42. PubMed

Cerasoli S, Wertin T, McGuire MA, Rodrigues A, Aubrey DP, Pereira JS, Teskey RO. Poplar saplings exposed to recurring temperature shifts of different amplitude exhibit differences in leaf gas exchange and growth despite equal mean temperature. AoB Plants. 2014;6:1-9. PubMed PMC

von Caemmerer S, Evans JR. Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:629-37. PubMed

Weston DJ, Bauerle WL. Inhibition and acclimation of C3 photosynthesis to moderate heat: a perspective from thermally contrasting genotypes of Acer rubrum (red maple). Tree Physiol. 2007;27:1083-92. PubMed

Raven PH, Evert RF, Eichhorn SE. Biology of plants.. W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd; 2005.

Lahr EC, Schade GW, Crossett CC, Watson MR. Photosynthesis and isoprene emission from trees along an urban-rural gradient in Texas. Glob Chang Biol. 2015;21:4221-36. PubMed

Way DA, Oren R, Kim H-S, Katul GG. How well do stomatal conductance models perform on closing plant carbon budgets? A test using seedlings grown under current and elevated air temperatures. J Geophys Res. 2011;116:G04031.

Slot M, Garcia MN, Winter K. Temperature response of CO2 exchange in three tropical tree species. Funct Plant Biol. 2016;43:468-78. PubMed

Urban J, Ingwers MW, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra. J Exp Bot. 2017;68:1757-67. PubMed PMC

Mott K, Parkhust D. Stomatal response to humidity in air and in helox. Plant Cell Environ. 1991;14:509-15.

Klein T. The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct Ecol. 2014;28:1313-20.

Liu S, Teskey RO. Responses of foliar gas exchange to long-term elevated CO2 concentrations in mature loblolly pine trees. Tree Physiol. 1995;15:351-9. PubMed

Leuning R. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal - photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18:339-55.

Xu X, Medvigy D, Powers JS, Becknell JM, Guan K. Diversity in plant hydraulic traits explains seasonal and inter-annual variations of vegetation dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests. New Phytol. 2016;212:80-95. PubMed

Mirfenderesgi G, Bohrer G, Matheny AM, Fatichi S, de Moraes Frasson RP, Schäfer KVR. Tree-level hydrodynamic approach for modeling aboveground water storage and stomatal conductance illuminates the effects of tree hydraulic strategy. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2016;121:1792-813.

Verhoef A, Egea G. Modeling plant transpiration under limited soil water: Comparison of different plant and soil hydraulic parameterizations and preliminary implications for their use in land surface models. Agric For Meteorol. 2014;191:22-32.

Ameye M, Wertin TM, Bauweraerts I, McGuire MA, Teskey RO, Steppe K. The effect of induced heat waves on Pinus taeda and Quercus rubra seedlings in ambient and elevated CO2 atmospheres. New Phytol. 2012;196:448-61. PubMed

Brodribb TJ, McAdam SA, Carins Murphy MR. Xylem and stomata, coordinated through time and space. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:872-80. PubMed

Cochard H, Martin R, Gross P, Bogeat-Triboulot MB. Temperature effects on hydraulic conductance and water relations of Quercus robur L. J Exp Bot. 2000;51:1255-9. PubMed

Vapor-pressure-deficit-controlled temperature response of photosynthesis in tropical trees