Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry: The EFFORTLESS Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie
PubMed
28797351
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.040
PII: S0735-1097(17)37928-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- appropriate therapy, inappropriate therapy, leadless, primary prevention, secondary prevention, ventricular arrhythmias,
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- defibrilátory implantabilní * MeSH
- komorová tachykardie terapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to defibrillate ventricular arrhythmias, avoiding drawbacks of transvenous leads. The global EFFORTLESS S-ICD (Evaluation oF FactORs ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD) registry is collecting outcomes in 985 patients during a 5-year follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of the EFFORTLESS registry is to determine the safety of the S-ICD by evaluating complications and inappropriate shock rate. METHODS: This is the first report on the full patient cohort and study endpoints with follow-up ≥1 year. The predefined endpoints are 30- and 360-day complications, and shocks for atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 3.1 ± 1.5 years and 82 completed the study protocol 5-year visit. Average age was 48 years, 28% were women, ejection fraction was 43 ± 18%, and 65% had a primary prevention indication. The S-ICD system and procedure complication rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 8.4% at 360 days. The 1-year complication rate trended toward improvement from the first to last quartile of enrollment (11.3% [quartile 1]) to 7.8% [quartile 2], 6.6% [quartile 3], and 7.4% [quartile 4]; quartile 1 vs. quartiles 2 to 4; p = 0.06). Few device extractions occurred due to need for antitachycardia (n = 5), or biventricular (n = 4) or bradycardia pacing (n = 1). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 8.1% at 1 year and 11.7% after 3.1 years. At implant, 99.5% of patients had a successful conversion of induced ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The 1- and 5-year rates of appropriate shock were 5.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Conversion success for discrete spontaneous episodes was 97.4% overall. CONCLUSIONS: This registry demonstrates that the S-ICD fulfills predefined endpoints for safety and efficacy. Midterm performance rates on complications, inappropriate shocks, and conversion efficacy were comparable to rates observed in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator studies. (Evaluation oF Factors ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD [The EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry]; NCT01085435).
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand
Boston Scientific St Paul Minnesota
Division of Electrophysiology University Hospital Münster Germany
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
Heart Center Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Heart Hospital London United Kingdom
Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede the Netherlands
Russells Hall Hospital Dudley United Kingdom
St Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein the Netherlands; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: long-term results of the EFFORTLESS study
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01085435