• This record comes from PubMed

Different substrate regimes determine transcriptional profiles and gene co-expression in Methanosarcina barkeri (DSM 800)

. 2017 Oct ; 101 (19) : 7303-7316. [epub] 20170821

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
2013CB733502 973 project
2017JY0231 Sichuan Province Science and Technology Project
KLCAS-2016-03 Open Found of Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology CAS
Sino BON China Biodiversity Observation Networks

Links

PubMed 28828628
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8457-4
PII: 10.1007/s00253-017-8457-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Methanosarcina barkeri (DSM 800) is a metabolically versatile methanogen and shows distinct metabolic status under different substrate regimes. However, the mechanisms underlying distinct transcriptional profiles under different substrate regimes remain elusive. In this study, based on transcriptional analysis, the growth performances and gene expressions of M. barkeri fed on acetate, H2 + CO2, and methanol, respectively, were investigated. M. barkeri showed higher growth performances under methanol, followed by H2 + CO2 and acetate, which corresponded well with the variations of gene expressions. The α diversity (evenness) of gene expressions was highest under the acetate regime, followed by H2 + CO2 and methanol, and significantly and negatively correlated with growth performances. The gene co-expression analysis showed that "Energy production and conversion," "Coenzyme transport and metabolism," and "Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis" showed deterministic cooperation patterns of intra- and inter-functional classes. However, "Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones" showed exclusion with other functional classes. The gene expressions and especially the relationships among them potentially drove the shifts of metabolic status under different substrate regimes. Consequently, this study revealed the diversity-related ecological strategies that a high α diversity probably provided more fitness and tolerance under natural environments and oppositely a low α diversity strengthened some specific physiological functions, as well as the co-responses of gene expressions to different substrate regimes.

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...