Different substrate regimes determine transcriptional profiles and gene co-expression in Methanosarcina barkeri (DSM 800)
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
2013CB733502
973 project
2017JY0231
Sichuan Province Science and Technology Project
KLCAS-2016-03
Open Found of Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology CAS
Sino BON
China Biodiversity Observation Networks
PubMed
28828628
DOI
10.1007/s00253-017-8457-4
PII: 10.1007/s00253-017-8457-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Co-expression, Diversity, Ecological strategies, Methanosarcina barkeri, Substrate regimes,
- MeSH
- RNA, Archaeal genetics MeSH
- Euryarchaeota genetics metabolism MeSH
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration MeSH
- Culture Media chemistry MeSH
- Acetic Acid chemistry MeSH
- Methanol chemistry MeSH
- Methanosarcina barkeri genetics metabolism MeSH
- Carbon Dioxide chemistry MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Archaeal MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, RNA MeSH
- Substrate Specificity MeSH
- Transcriptome * MeSH
- Hydrogen chemistry MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- RNA, Archaeal MeSH
- Culture Media MeSH
- Acetic Acid MeSH
- Methanol MeSH
- Carbon Dioxide MeSH
- Hydrogen MeSH
Methanosarcina barkeri (DSM 800) is a metabolically versatile methanogen and shows distinct metabolic status under different substrate regimes. However, the mechanisms underlying distinct transcriptional profiles under different substrate regimes remain elusive. In this study, based on transcriptional analysis, the growth performances and gene expressions of M. barkeri fed on acetate, H2 + CO2, and methanol, respectively, were investigated. M. barkeri showed higher growth performances under methanol, followed by H2 + CO2 and acetate, which corresponded well with the variations of gene expressions. The α diversity (evenness) of gene expressions was highest under the acetate regime, followed by H2 + CO2 and methanol, and significantly and negatively correlated with growth performances. The gene co-expression analysis showed that "Energy production and conversion," "Coenzyme transport and metabolism," and "Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis" showed deterministic cooperation patterns of intra- and inter-functional classes. However, "Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones" showed exclusion with other functional classes. The gene expressions and especially the relationships among them potentially drove the shifts of metabolic status under different substrate regimes. Consequently, this study revealed the diversity-related ecological strategies that a high α diversity probably provided more fitness and tolerance under natural environments and oppositely a low α diversity strengthened some specific physiological functions, as well as the co-responses of gene expressions to different substrate regimes.
References provided by Crossref.org