Prognostic discrimination based on the EUTOS long-term survival score within the International Registry for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in children and adolescents
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28838993
PubMed Central
PMC5622854
DOI
10.3324/haematol.2017.170035
PII: haematol.2017.170035
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chronická myeloidní leukemie diagnóza farmakoterapie epidemiologie mortalita MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The EUTOS Long-Term Survival score was tested in 350 children with chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase treated with imatinib and registered in the International Registry for Childhood Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. With a median follow up of 3 years (range, 1 month to 6 years) progression and/or death (whichever came first) occurred in 23 patients. For the entire cohort of patients the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 92% (95% CI: 87%-94%) and the 5-year survival accounting for chronic myeloid leukemia deaths was 97% (95% CI: 94%-99%). Of the 309 patients allocated to low (n=199), intermediate (n=68) and high (n=42) risk groups by the EUTOS Long-Term Survival score, events (progression and/or death) occurred in 6.0%, 8.8% and 26.2%, respectively. Estimates of the 5-year progression-free survival rates according to these three risk groups were 96% (95% CI: 92%-98%), 88% (95% CI: 76%-95%) and 67% (95% CI: 48%-81%), respectively. Differences in progression-free survival according to these risk groups were highly significant (P<0.0001, overall). The EUTOS Long-Term Survival score showed better differentiation of progression-free survival than the Sokal (<45 years), Euro and EUTOS scores in children and adolescents with chronic myeloid leukemia and should be considered in therapeutic algorithms. (Trial registered at: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01281735).
Children's Cancer Research Institute and St Anna Children's Hospital Vienna Austria
Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Transplantation Wroclaw Medical University Poland
Department of Pediatric Hematology Robert Debré Hospital Paris France
Department of Pediatric Hematology Uludağ University Hospital Görükle Bursa Turkey
Department of Pediatric Oncology of University Children's Hospital Bratislava Slovakia
Department of Pediatrics Ghent University Hospital Belgium
Department of Pediatrics Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong China
Department of Pediatrics Rigshospitalet University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Pediatrics Saint George Hospital University Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
Department of Pediatrics University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, et al. Prognostic discrimination in good-risk chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood. 1984;63(4):789–799. PubMed
Hasford J, Pfirmann M, Hehlman R, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alpha. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(11):850–858. PubMed
Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffman V, et al. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood. 2011;118(3):686–692. PubMed
Sokal JE, Baccarani M, Tura S, et al. Prognostic discrimination among younger patients with chronic granulocytic leukemia: relevance to bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1985;66(6):1352–1357. PubMed
Gurrea Salas D, Glauche I, Tauer JT, et al. Can prognostic scoring systems for chronic myeloid leukemia as established in adults be applied to pediatric patients? Ann Hematol. 2015;9(8):1363–1371. PubMed
Pfirrmann M, Baccarani M, Saussele S, et al. Prognosis of long-term survival considering disease-specific death in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30(1):48–56. PubMed
Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;122(6):872–884. PubMed PMC
Guilhot J, Baccarani M, Clark RE, et al. Definitions, methodological and statistical issues for phase 3 clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia: a proposal by the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2012;119(25):5963–5971. PubMed
Gray RJ. A class of k-samples tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16(3):1141–1154.
Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Baccarani M, et al. Differences among young adults, adults and elderly chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):185–192. PubMed
Kalmanti L, Saussele S, Lauseker M, et al. Younger patients with chronic myeloid leukemia do well in spite of poor prognostic indicators: results from the randomized CML study IV. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(1):71–80. PubMed PMC
Hoffmann VS, Baccarani M, Hasford J, et al. The EUTOS population-based registry: incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 European countries. Leukemia. 2015;29(6):1336–1343. PubMed
Oyekunle AA, Osho PO, Aneke JC, et al. The predictive value of the Sokal and Hasford scoring systems in chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era. J Hemat Malign. 2012;2(2):25–32.
Bower H, Björkholm M, Dickman PW, Höglund M, Lambert PC, Andersson TM. Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(24):2851–2857. PubMed
Hehlmann R, Müller MC, Lauseker M, et al. Deep molecular response is reached by the majority of patients treated with imatinib, predicts survival, and is achieved more quickly by optimized high-dose imatinib: results from the randomized CML-Study IV. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):415–423. PubMed
Millot F, Baruchel A, Guilhot J, et al. Imatinib is effective in children with previously untreated chronic myelogenous leukemia in early chronic phase: results of the French national phase IV trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(20):2827–2832. PubMed
Millot F, Guilhot J, Baruchel A, et al. Impact of early molecular response in children with chronic myeloid leukemia treated in the French Glivec phase 4 study. Blood. 2014;124(15):2408–2410. PubMed
Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S, et al. Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-α in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(12):1634–1642. PubMed
Hoffmann VS, Baccarani M, Hasford J, et al. Treatment and outcome of 2904 CML patients from the EUTOS population-based registry. Leukemia. 2017;31(3):593–601. PubMed
De la Fuente J, Baruchel A, Biondi A, et al. How I manage CML in children - guidelines for the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia in children and young people up to the age of 18 years. Br J Haematol. 2014;167(1):33–47. PubMed
Cortes JE, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, et al. Final 5-year study results of DASISION: the dasatinib versus imatinib study in treatment-naïve chronic myeloid leukemia patients trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(20):2333–2340. PubMed PMC
Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Hughes TP, et al. Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial Leukemia. 2016;30(5):1044–1054. PubMed PMC
Pemmaraju N, Kantarjian H, Shan J, et al. Analysis of outcomes in adolescents and young adults with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Haematologica. 2012;97(7):1029–1035. PubMed PMC
Sasaki K, Strom S, O’Brien S, et al. Relative survival in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor era: analysis of patient data from six prospective clinical trials. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(5):e186–e193. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01281735