Assessment of rosehips based on the content of their biologically active compounds
Language English Country China (Republic : 1949- ) Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
28911653
PubMed Central
PMC9328834
DOI
10.1016/j.jfda.2016.12.019
PII: j.jfda.2016.12.019
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- antioxidant activity, carotenoids, flavonoids, tocopherols, triterpenoic acids,
- MeSH
- Antioxidants MeSH
- Biphenyl Compounds MeSH
- Flavonoids MeSH
- Picrates MeSH
- Rosa * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl MeSH Browser
- Antioxidants MeSH
- Biphenyl Compounds MeSH
- Flavonoids MeSH
- Picrates MeSH
In this study, an in-depth analysis of the unique set of rosehip samples from 71 Rosa genotypes was conducted with the aim to identify the most suitable ones for applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries based on the content of biologically active compounds. In the first part of our experiments, the antioxidant activity was determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay and the genotypes with the highest values were selected for the follow-up analysis. In the second part of experiments, the major classes of biologically active compounds in rosehips such as carotenoids, tocopherols, flavonoids, and triterpenoic acids were further quantified using liquid chromatography-based techniques. Large variation was observed among all the analyzed compounds with intraspecific variation often hiding interspecific or intersectional differences. The compounds studied herein thus do not provide a sharp tool for chemotaxonomic resolution of the genus Rosa. High intraspecific variation indicates the necessity to screen and utilize individual rose genotypes rather than representatives of the species when searching for sources of biologically active compounds. In the final stage of the study, 10 genotypes were selected for further cultivation and use, based on the highest concentrations of the analyzed biologically active compounds.
See more in PubMed
Bruneau A, Starr JR, Joly S. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Rosa: new evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences and an appraisal of current knowledge. Syst Bot. 2007;32:366–78.
Wissemann V, Ritz CM. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Bot J Linn Soc. 2005;147:275–90.
Chrubasik C, Roufogalis B, Muller-Ladner U, Chrubasik S. A systematic review on the Rosa canina effect and efficacy profiles. Phytother Res. 2008;22:725–33. PubMed
Ghazghazi H, Miguel MG, Hasnaoui B, Sebei H, Ksontini M, Figueiredo AC, Pedro LG, Barroso JG. Phenols, essential oils, and carotenoids of Rosa canina from Tunisia and their antioxidant activities. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:2709–16.
Ercisli S. Chemical composition of fruits in some rose (Rosa spp.) species. Food Chem. 2007;104:1379–84.
Angelov G, Boyadzhieva S, Georgieva S. Rosehip extraction; process optimization and antioxidant capacity of extracts. Central Eur J Chem. 2014;12:502–8.
Andersson SC, Olsson ME, Johansson E, Rumpunen K. Carotenoid in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries during ripening and use of pheophytin as a maturity marker. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;57:250–8. PubMed
Barros L, Carvalho AM, Morais J, Ferreira I. Strawberry-tree, blackthorn and rose fruits: detailed characterization in nutrients and phytochemicals with antioxidant properties. Food Chem. 2010;120:247–54.
Andersson SC, Olsson ME, Gustavsson KE, Johansson E, Rumpunen K. Tocopherols in rosehips (Rosa spp.) during ripening. J Sci Food Agric. 2012;92:2116–21. PubMed
Hvattum E. Determination of phenolic compounds in rosehip (Rosa canina) using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and diode-array detection. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002;16:655–62. PubMed
Salminen J, Karonen M, Lempa K, Liimatainen J, Sinkkonen J, Lukkarinen M, Pihlaja K. Characterisation of proanthocyanidin aglycones and glycosides from rosehips by high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and their rapid quantification together with vitamin C. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1077:170–80. PubMed
Adamczak A, Buchwald W, Zieliński J, Mielcarek S. Flavonoid and organic acid content in rosehips (Rosa L., Sect. Caninae DC. E.M. Christ.) Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot. 2012;54:105–12.
Gao X, Bjork L, Trajkovski V, Uggla M. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of rosehip ethanol extracts in different test systems. J Sci Food Agric. 2000;80:2021–7.
Nowak R, Polok K. The evaluation of the genetic similarity of roses (Rosa L.) in Caninae section. Poznań: Seria Biologia. In: Prus-Głowacki W, Pawlaczyk EM, editors. Variability and evolution—new perspectives. Adam Mickiewicz University; 2005. pp. 175–85.
Wenzig EM, Widowitz U, Kunert O, Chrubasik S, Bucar F, Knauder E, Bauer R. Phytochemical composition and in vitro pharmacological activity of two rosehip (Rosa canina L.) preparations. Phytomedicine. 2008;15:826–35. PubMed
Safayhi H, Sailer ER. Anti-inflammatory actions of pentacyclic triterpenes. Planta Med. 1997;63:487–93. PubMed
Liu J. Pharmacology of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid. J Ethnopharmacol. 1995;49:57–68. PubMed
Liu J. Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid: research perspectives. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100:92–4. PubMed
Yogeeswari P, Sriram D. Betulinic acid and its derivatives: a review on their biological properties. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:657–66. PubMed
Kharazmi A. Laboratory and preclinical studies on the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of rosehip powder—identification and characterization of the active component GOPO ®. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16:S5–7.
Christensen LP. Galactolipids as potential health promoting compounds in vegetable foods. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2009;1:50–8. PubMed
Jager AK, Petersen KN, Thomasen G, Christensen SB. Isolation of linoleic and α-linolenic acids as COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors in rosehip. Phytother Res. 2008;22:982–4. PubMed
Oprica L, Bucsa C, Zamfirache MM. Evaluation of some phytochemical constituents and the antioxidant activity in six rosehips species collected from different altitude of Suceava District. Ann Alexandru loan Cuza Univ Sect II a Genet Mol Biol. 2016;27:1–10.
Demir F, Őzcan M. Chemical and technological properties of rose (Rosa canina L.) fruits grown wild in Turkey. J Food Eng. 2001;47:333–6.
Kazankya A, Turkoglu N, Yilmaz M, Balta MF. Pomological description of Rosa canina selections from Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Int J Bot. 2005;1:100–2.
Ouerghemmi S, Sebei H, Siracusa L, Ruberto G, Saija A, Cimino F, Cristani M. Comparative study of phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of leaf extracts from three wild Rosa species grown in different Tunisia regions: Rosa canina L., Rosa moschata Herrm. and Rosa sempervirens L. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;94:167–77.
Andersson SC, Rumpunen K, Johansson E, Olsson ME. Carotenoid content and composition in rosehips (Rosa spp.) during ripening, determination of suitable maturity marker and implications for health promoting food products. Food Chem. 2011;128:689–96.
Novruzov E. Pigments of species in the genus Rosa and their chemotaxonomic value. In: International RoseHip Conference. ISHS Acta Horticulturae. 2005;690:225–30.
Sarangowa O, Kanazawa T, Nishizawa M, Myoda T, Bai C, Yamagishi T. Flavonol glycosides in the petal of Rosa species as chemotaxonomic markers. Phytochemistry. 2014;104:61–8. PubMed
Grossi C, Raymond O, Jay M. Flavonoid and enzyme polymorphisms and taxonomic organization of Rosa sections: Carolinae, Cinnamomeae, Pimpinellifoliae and Synstylae. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1998;26:857–71.
Zhu ZM, Gao XF, Fougere-Danezan M. Phylogeny of Rosa sections Chinenses and Synstylae (Rosaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;87:50–64. PubMed