PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Institute of Scientific Instruments Brno Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Department of Medicine Haukeland Universitetssjukehus Bergen Norway

Dept of Biomedical Engineering Brno Univ of Technology Brno Czech Republic

National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dietrich C F, Averkiou M A, Correas J M, Lassau N, Leen E, Piscaglia F. An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2012;33:344–351. PubMed

Frohlich E, Muller R, Cui X W, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Dietrich C F. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: Official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2015;34:179–196. PubMed

Claudon M, Dietrich C F, Choi B I, Cosgrove D O, Kudo M, Nolsoe C P et al.Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2013;39:187–210. PubMed

Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich C F, Cosgrove D O, Gilja O H, Bachmann Nielsen M et al.The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2012;33:33–59. PubMed

Hudson J M, Williams R, Tremblay-Darveau C, Sheeran P S, Milot L, Bjarnason G A et al.Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound for therapy monitoring. European journal of radiology. 2015;84:1650–1657. PubMed

Tang M X, Mulvana H, Gauthier T, Lim A K, Cosgrove D O, Eckersley R J et al.Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: A review of sources of variability. Interface focus. 2011;1:520–539. PubMed PMC

Gauthier T P, Averkiou M A, Leen E L. Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics. 2011;51:102–106. PubMed

Gauthier T P, Chebil M, Peronneau P, Lassau N. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics. 2012;52:12–19. PubMed

Lassau N, Bonastre J, Kind M, Vilgrain V, Lacroix J, Cuinet M et al.Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting outcomes of antiangiogenic therapy for solid tumors: The French multicenter support for innovative and expensive techniques study. Investigative radiology. 2014;49:794–800. PubMed PMC

Zink F, Kratzer W, Schmidt S, Oeztuerk S, Mason R A, Porzner M et al.Comparison of two high-end ultrasound systems for contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantification of mural microvascularity in crohn’s disease. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2016;37:74–81. PubMed

Hudson J M, Leung K, Burns P N. The lognormal perfusion model for disruption replenishment measurements of blood flow: In vivo validation. Ultrasound in medicine & biology. 2011;37:1571–1578. PubMed

Gauthier M, Tabarout F, Leguerney I, Polrot M, Pitre S, Peronneau P et al.Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: An in vitro and in vivo study. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012;31:595–608. PubMed

Jirik R, Nylund K, Gilja O H, Mezl M, Harabis V, Kolar R et al.Ultrasound perfusion analysis combining bolus-tracking and burst-replenishment. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control. 2013;60:310–319. PubMed

Nylund K, Jirik R, Mezl M, Leh S, Hausken T, Pfeffer F et al.Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound comparison between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2013;39:1197–1206. PubMed

Jirik RNK, Taxt T, Mezl Martin, Hausken T, Harabis V, Kolar R, Standara M, Gilja OH. Parametric ultrasound perfusion analysis combining bolus tracking and replenishment 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium: IEEE. 2012; 1323–1326

Jirik R, Soucek K, Mezl M, Bartos M, Drazanova E, Drafi F et al.Blind deconvolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ultrasound. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference. 2014;2014:4276–4279. PubMed

Engjom TLB, Nylund K, Erchinger F, Gilja OH, Dimcevski G. 229 Pancreatic genotype–phenotype co-variations in cystic fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2015

Schafer S, Nylund K, Saevik F, Engjom T, Mezl M, Jirik R et al.Semi-automatic motion compensation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from abdominal organs for perfusion analysis. Computers in biology and medicine. 2015;63:229–237. PubMed

Lewis M P, Lo S K, Reber P U, Patel A, Gloor B, Todd K E et al.Endoscopic measurement of pancreatic tissue perfusion in patients with chronic pancreatitis and control patients. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2000;51:195–199. PubMed

Atri M, Hudson J M, Sinaei M, Williams R, Milot L, Moshonov H et al.Impact of acquisition method and region of interest placement on inter-observer agreement and measurement of tumor response to targeted therapy using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2016;42:763–768. PubMed

Gauthier M, Leguerney I, Thalmensi J, Chebil M, Parisot S, Peronneau P et al.Estimation of intra-operator variability in perfusion parameter measurements using DCE-US. World Journal of Radiology. 2011;3:70–81. PubMed PMC

Rognin NG, Frinking P, Costa M, Arditi M.editors. In-vivo perfusion quantification by contrast ultrasound: Validation of the use of linearized video data vs. raw RF data. 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; 2008 2-5 Nov. 2008;

Erchinger F, Dimcevski G, Engjom T, Gilja O H. Transabdominal ultrasonography of the pancreas: basic and new aspects. Imaging in Medicine. 2011;3:11.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas shows impaired perfusion in pancreas insufficient cystic fibrosis patients