Neurons and a sensory organ in the pedipalps of male spiders reveal that it is not a numb structure
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28939892
PubMed Central
PMC5610179
DOI
10.1038/s41598-017-12555-5
PII: 10.1038/s41598-017-12555-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- čití, cítění fyziologie MeSH
- mužské pohlavní orgány inervace ultrastruktura MeSH
- neurony fyziologie ultrastruktura MeSH
- pavouci fyziologie MeSH
- sensilla fyziologie ultrastruktura MeSH
- sexuální chování zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- transmisní elektronová mikroskopie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The primary function of male copulatory organs is depositing spermatozoa directly into the female reproductive tract. Typical male copulatory organs are sensorily active. This is in contrast to the copulatory organs of male spiders (i.e. palpal bulbi), which have been assumed to lack nerves and muscles until recently. Neurons have been found within the bulbus of the spider Hickmania troglodytes, a taxon basal to all Neocribellata. We provide the first evidence for neurons and an internalized multi-sensillar sensory organ in the bulbus of an entelegyne spider (Philodromus cespitum). The sensory organ likely provides mechanical or chemical feedback from the intromitting structure, the embolus. We found further neurons associated with two glands within the bulbus, one of which is likely responsible for sperm extrusion during mating. These findings provide a new framework for studies on reproductive behaviour and sexual selection in spiders.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Eberhard, W. G. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. (Harvard University Press, 1985).
Harm MB. zur Kenntnis des Baues, der Funktion und der Entwicklung des akzessorischen Kopulationsorgans von Segestria bavarica C. L. Koch. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere. 1937;22:629–670. doi: 10.1007/BF00446571. DOI
Cooke JAL. Spider genitalia and phylogeny. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. (2e serie) 1970;41:142–146.
Eberhard WG, Huber BA. Possible links between embryology, lack of innervation, and the evolution of male genitalia in spiders. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 1998;11:73–80.
Comstock JH. The palpi of male spiders. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1910;3:161–185. doi: 10.1093/aesa/3.3.161. DOI
Gering RL. Structure and function of the genitalia in some American agelenid spiders. Smithson. Misc. Collect. 1953;121:1–84.
Levi HW. Evolutionary trends in the development of the palpal sclerites in the spider family Theridiidae. J. Morphol. 1961;108:1–9. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051080102. DOI
Coddington JA, Levi HW. Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae) Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1991;22:565–592. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.003025. DOI
Huber BA. The evolutionary transformation from muscular to hydraulic movements in spider genitalia: a study based on histological serial sections. J. Morphol. 2004;261:364–376. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10255. PubMed DOI
Kraus O. Liphistius and the evolution of spider genitalia. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1978;42:235–254.
Eberhard, W. G. & Huber, B. A. Spider genitalia in The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. (eds. Leonard, J. & Cordoba-Aguilar, A.) 249–284 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Osterloh AB. zur Kenntnis des Kopulationsapparates einiger Spinnen. Z. Wiss. Zool. 1922;119:326–421.
Lamoral BH. On the morphology, anatomy, histology and function of the tarsal organ on the pedipalpi of Palystes castaneus (Sparassidae, Araneida) Ann. Natal. Mus. 1973;21:609–648.
Suhm M, Thaler K, Alberti G. Glands in the male palpal organ and the origin of the mating plug in Amaurobius species (Araneae: Amaurobiidae) Zool. Anz. 1995;234:191–199.
Huber BA. Genital mechanics and sexual selection in the spider Nesticus cellulanus (Araneae: Nesticidae) Can. J. Zool. 1993;71:2437–2447. doi: 10.1139/z93-340. DOI
Uhl G, Huber BA, Rose W. Male pedipalp morphology and copulatory mechanism in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Araneae, Pholcidae) Bull. Br. Arachnol.l Soc. 1995;10:1–9.
Mouginot P, et al. Securing paternity by mutilating female genitalia. Curr. Biol. 2015;25:2980–2984. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.074. PubMed DOI
Eberhard WG. Why study spider sex: Special traits of spiders facilitate studies of sperm competition and cryptic female choice. J. Arachnol. 2004;32:545–556. doi: 10.1636/0161-8202(2004)032[0545:WSSSST]2.0.CO;2. DOI
Eberhard WG, Huber BA. Courtship, copulation, and sperm transfer in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) with implications for higher classification. J. Arachnol. 1998;26:342–368.
Watson PJ. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae) Anim. Behav. 1991;41:343–360. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80486-5. DOI
Huber BA. Spider reproductive behaviour: a review of Gerhardt’s work from 1911–1933, with implications for sexual selection. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 1998;11:81–91.
Stratton GE, Hebets EA, Miller PR, Miller GL. Pattern and duration of copulation in wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) J Arachnol. 1996;24:186–200.
Eberhard WG. Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution. 1994;48:711–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01356.x. PubMed DOI
Eberhard, W. G. Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. (NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).
Bukowski TC, Linn CD, Christenson TE. Copulation and sperm release in Gasteracantha cancriformis (Araneae: Araneidae): differential male behaviour based on female mating history. Anim. Behav. 2001;62:887–895. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1834. DOI
Jones TM, Elgar MA. Male insemination decisions and sperm quality influence paternity in the golden orb-weaving spider. Behav. Ecol. 2008;19:285–291. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm126. DOI
Lipke E, Hammel JU, Michalik P. First evidence of neurons in the male copulatory organ of a spider (Arachnida, Araneae) Biol. Lett. 2015;11:20150465. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0465. PubMed DOI PMC
Forster RR, Platnick NI, Gray MR. A review of spider superfamilies Hypochiloidea and Austrochiloidea (Araneae, Araneomorphae) Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1987;185:1–116.
Coddington, J. A. Phylogeny and classification of spiders in Spiders of North America: an identification manual (eds Ubick, D., Paquin, P., Cushing, P. E. & Roth, V.) 18–24 (American Arachnological Society, 2005).
Garrison NL, et al. Spider phylogenomics: untangling the Spider Tree of Life. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1719. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1719. PubMed DOI PMC
Foelix, R. F. Sensory nerves and peripheral synapses in Neurobiology of Arachnids (ed. Barth, F. N.) 189–200 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985).
Altner H, Prillinger L. Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance. Int. Rev. Cyt. 1980;67:69–139. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62427-4. DOI
Keil, T. A. & Steinbrecht, R. A. Mechanosensitive and olfactory sensilla in insects in Insect Ultrastructure. Volume 2. (eds. King, R. C. & Akai, H.) 477–516 (Plenum Press, 1984).
Blumenthal H. Untersuchungen über das „Tarsalorgan“ der Spinnen. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere. 1935;29:667–719.
Foelix RF, Chu-Wang IW. The morphology of spider sensilla. II. Chemoreceptors. Tissue. Cell. 1973;5:461–478. doi: 10.1016/S0040-8166(73)80038-2. PubMed DOI
Anton S, Tichy H. Hygro- and thermoreceptors in tip-pore sensilla of the tarsal organ of the spider Cupiennius salei: innervation and central projection. Cell. Tissue. Res. 1994;278:399–407.
Dumpert K. Spider odor receptor: electrophysiological proof. Experientia. 1978;34:754–756. doi: 10.1007/BF01947305. DOI
Ehn R, Tichy H. Hygro- and thermoreceptive tarsal organ in the spider Cupiennius salei. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 1994;174:345–350. doi: 10.1007/BF00240216. DOI
Smith, D. S. Insect cells: their structure and function. 67–74 (Oliver and Boyd, 1968).
Kraus O. Male spider genitalia: evolutionary changes in structure and function. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg (NF) 1984;27:373–382.
Cooke JAL. Synopsis of the structure and function of the genitalia of Dysdera crocata (Araneae, Dysderidae) Senckenb. Biol. 1966;47:35–43.
Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider JM. Mating plugs and genital mutilation in spiders (Araneae) Genetica. 2010;138:75–104. doi: 10.1007/s10709-009-9388-5. PubMed DOI
Uhl G, Kunz K, Vöcking O, Lipke E. A spider mating plug: origin and constraints of production. Biol. J. Linnean. Soc. 2014;113:345–354. doi: 10.1111/bij.12359. DOI
Sentenská L, Pekár S, Lipke E, Michalik P, Uhl G. Female control of mate plugging in a female-cannibalistic spider (Micaria sociabilis) BMC Evol. Biol. 2015;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0278-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Coddington JA. Ontogeny and homology in the male palpus of orb-weaving spiders and their relatives, with comments on phylogeny (Araneoclada: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea) Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 1990;496:1–52. doi: 10.5479/si.00810282.496. DOI
Karnovsky MJ. A formaldehyde glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 1965;27:137.
Richardson KC, Jarett L, Finke EH. Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain. Techn. 1960;35:313–323. doi: 10.3109/10520296009114754. PubMed DOI
Richter S, et al. Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary. Front. Zool. 2010;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-29. PubMed DOI PMC