AIM: To create a predictive score for the discrimination between benign and malignant parotid tumors using elastographic parameters and to compare its sensitivity and specificity with standard ultrasound. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with parotid gland lesions for whom surgery was planned were examined using conventional ultrasound, Doppler examination, and shear wave elastography. Results of the examinations were compared with those ones of histology. RESULTS: There were 96 benign and 28 malignant lesions in our cohort. Blurred tumor margin alone proved to be an excellent predictor of malignancy with the sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 97%. Enlarged cervical lymph nodes, tumor vascularisation, microcalcifications presence, homogeneous echogenicity, and bilateral occurrence also discriminated between benign and malignant tumors. However, their inclusion in a predictive model did not improve its performance. Elastographic parameters (the stiffness maxima and minima ratio being the best) also exhibited significant differences between benign and malignant tumors, but again, their inclusion did not significantly improve the predictive power of the blurred margin classifier. CONCLUSION: Even though elastography satisfactorily distinguishes benign from malignant lesions on its own, it hardly provides any additional value in evaluation of biological character of parotid gland tumors when used as an adjunct to regular ultrasound examination.

Department of Medical Biophysics Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc IP Pavlova 6 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc IP Pavlova 6 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Radiology Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc IP Pavlova 6 Olomouc Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Mansour N., Hofauer B., Knopf A. Ultrasound elastography in diffuse and focal parotid gland lesions. ORL. 2017;79(1-2):54–64. doi: 10.1159/000455727. PubMed DOI

Badea A. F., Bran S., Tamas-Szora A., Floareş A., Badea R., Baciut G. Solid parotid tumors: An individual and integrative analysis of various ultrasonographic criteria. A prospective and observational study. Medical Ultrasonography. 2013;15(4):289–298. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.154.afb2. PubMed DOI

Bhatia K. S. S., Rasalkar D. D., Lee Y.-P., et al. Evaluation of real-time qualitative sonoelastography of focal lesions in the parotid and submandibular glands: Applications and limitations. European Radiology. 2010;20(8):1958–1964. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1756-0. PubMed DOI

Celebi I., Mahmutoglu A. S. Early results of real-time qualitative sonoelastography in the evaluation of parotid gland masses: A study with histopathological correlation. Acta Radiologica. 2013;54(1):35–41. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120405. PubMed DOI

Dumitriu D., Dudea S. M., Botar-Jid C., Bǎciuţ G. Ultrasonographic and sonoelastographic features of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. Medical ultrasonography. 2010;12(3):175–183. PubMed

Olgun D. C., Kantarci F., Taskin U., et al. Relative proportions of stromal to cellular components of pleomorphic adenomas: Determination with shear wave elastography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014;33(3):503–508. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.3.503. PubMed DOI

Klintworth N., Mantsopoulos K., Zenk J., Psychogios G., Iro H., Bozzato A. Sonoelastography of parotid gland tumours: initial experience and identification of characteristic patterns. European Radiology. 2012;22(5):947–956. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2344-7. PubMed DOI

Wierzbicka M., Kałuzny J., Szczepanek-Parulska E., et al. Is sonoelastography a helpful method for evaluation of parotid tumors? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2013;270(7):2101–2107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2255-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Heřman J., Heřmanová Z., Salzman R., Vomáčka J., Stárek I. Ultrasound elastography and its use in the head and neck imaging. Casopis Lekaru Ceskych. 2015;154(5):222–226. PubMed

Heřman J., Sedlackova Z., Vachutka J., Furst T., Salzman R., Vomacka J. Shear wave elastography parameters of normal soft tissues of the neck. Biomedical Papers. doi: 10.5507/bp.2017.024. PubMed DOI

Cosgrove D. O., Berg W. A., Doré C. J., et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. European Radiology. 2012;22(5):1023–1032. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Cappelli C., Pirola I., Gandossi E., et al. Real-time elastography: a useful tool for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic cytologic findings. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012;31(11):1777–1782. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.11.1777. PubMed DOI

Bhatia K. S. S., Cho C. C. M., Tong C. S. L., Lee Y. Y. P., Yuen E. H. Y., Ahuja A. T. Shear wave elastography of focal salivary gland lesions: preliminary experience in a routine head and neck US clinic. European Radiology. 2012;22(5):957–965. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2364-3. PubMed DOI

Griffon-Etienne G., Boucher Y., Brekken C., Suit H. D., Jain R. K. Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: Clinical implications. Cancer Research. 1999;59(15):3776–3782. PubMed

Evans A., Whelehan P., Thomson K., et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. British Journal of Cancer. 2012;107(2):224–229. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.253. PubMed DOI PMC

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Solivary Gland Tumors, 2017, http://www.nccn.org.

The Role of Ultrasound and Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes