OBJECTIVE: Recently, a 24-h impedance was used to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, not every case of LPR is pathological. Thus, pathological pharyngeal impedance values need to be clearly established to diagnose pathological LPR. The aim of our study was to establish pathological 24-h pharyngoesophageal impedance/pH values for the diagnosis of LPR. METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary care setting. A total of 30 patients who were referred to microlaryngoscopy for a laryngeal pathology that might be caused by LPR were included in this prospective study. All patients were off proton-pump inhibitor therapy. The 24-h pharyngoesophageal impedance-pH monitoring was performed 1 day before surgery. A biopsy of laryngeal tissue was obtained during microlaryngoscopy and was analyzed by immunohistochemistry to detect pepsin. The patients were divided into two groups: pepsin negative and pepsin positive (which indicated pathological LPR). The results of 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-dual-channel pH monitoring were compared between the groups. The number of LPR episodes in the pepsin-positive group was analyzed to establish a cutoff value for pathological LPR. RESULTS: There were 18 participants in the pepsin-negative group and 12 in the pepsin-positive group. The median total pharyngeal refluxes detected were two (0-5) in the pepsin-negative group and 14 (6-39) in the pepsin-positive group (P<0.001), although the groups were otherwise homogeneous. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of all types of refluxes between groups. Six or more pharyngeal refluxes were the cutoff for the presence of pepsin in the laryngeal mucosa and, thereby, for the diagnosis of relevant/pathological LPR. CONCLUSION: Six or more pharyngeal reflux episodes registered during the 24-h impedance/pH monitoring seem to be the cutoff for diagnosing pathological LPR. Therefore, it is possible to suggest establishing this value as the pathological impedance value indicating pathological LPR. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Pathology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Jiang A, Liang M, Su Z et al. Immunohistochemical detection of pepsin in laryngeal mucosa for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 1426–1430. PubMed

Formanek M, Kominek P, Matousek P et al. Comparison of three methods used in the diagnosis of extraesophageal reflux in children with chronic otitis media with effusion. Gastroenterol Res Prac 2015; 2015: 547959. PubMed PMC

Crapko M, Kerschner JE, Syring M et al. Role of extra-esophageal reflux in chronic otitismedia with effusion. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1419–1423. PubMed

Zelenik K, Matousek P, Formanek M et al. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and simultaneous bronchial asthma suffer from significant extraesophageal reflux. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015; 5: 944–949. PubMed

Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 53: 1024–1031. PubMed PMC

Gooi Z, Ishman SL, Bock JM et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: paradigms for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014; 123: 677–685. PubMed

Oelschlager BK, Quiroga E, Isch JA et al. Gastroesophageal and pharyngeal reflux detection using impedance and 24-hour pH monitoring in asymptomatic subjects: defining the normal environment. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 54–62. PubMed

Hoppo T, Sanz AF, Nason KS et al. How much pharyngeal exposure is “normal”? Normative data for laryngopharyngeal reflux events using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII). J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 16–25. PubMed PMC

Zerbib F, Roman S, Bruley Des Varannes S et al. Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24-hour pH impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 366–372. PubMed

Hayat JO, Gabieta-Somnez S, Yazaki E et al. Pepsin in saliva for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 2014; 64: 361–362. PubMed

Yadlapati R, Adkins C, Jaiyeola DM et al. Abilities of oropharyngeal pH tests and salivary pepsin analysis to discriminate between asymptomatic volunteers and subjects with symptoms of laryngeal irritation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 535–542. PubMed PMC

Johnston N, Dettmar PW, Bishwokarma B et al. Activity/stability of human pepsin: implications for reflux attributed laryngeal disease. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1036–1039. PubMed

Diagnostic Value of the PeptestTM in Detecting Laryngopharyngeal Reflux